The impact of product innovation and service quality on survival recovery of msmes: the mediating role of financial performance
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56294/sctconf20251314Keywords:
Innovation Business Model, Service Quality, Product Innovation, MSME PerformanceAbstract
Introduction: The innovation business model explores the development of micro, small, and medium enterprises (MSMEs) in Indonesia between two time periods. In describing the condition of MSMEs, those who regulate MSMEs and policymakers in general are expected to help small and medium-sized enterprises improve service quality and product innovation for performance during the pandemic.
Methods: This study employs a quantitative and purposive sampling approach based on a questionnaire disseminated to MSMEs in Indonesia as the research object. Data analysis was conducted using Stata version 17 for multiple linear regression analysis and the classic assumption test with 218 respondents. There are two time periods, namely before 2019–2020 and during the COVID-19 pandemic in 2021–2022. Before and during the pandemic, the innovation business model of service quality and product innovation had a positive influence on MSMEs' performance in Indonesia.
Results: This became clear when we compared the quality of service, product innovation, and customer loyalty separately, contrasting the regression results of the circumstances before and during the pandemic and their impact on Indonesian MSMEs. A service quality approach (SERVQUAL) was adopted to measure service quality, which discusses five quality aspects: tangibility, reliability, responsiveness, assurance, and empathy.
Conclusions: This approach bears similarities to product innovation and performance variables, whose analyses parallel those of the quality-of-service variable.
References
1. Gonzalez-Reiche AS, Hernandez MM, Sullivan MJ, Ciferri B, Alshammary H, Obla A, Et Al. Introductions And Early Spread Of SARS-Cov-2 In The New York City Area. Science (1979). 2020;369(6501):297–301.
2. OECD. One Year Of SME And Entrepreneurship Policy Responses To COVID-19 : Lessons Learned To “ Build Back Better.” 2021;(April):1–36.
3. International Labour Organization. The Clock Is Ticking For Survival Of Indonesian Enterprises, Jobs At Risk: Key Findings Of The ILO SCORE Indonesia COVID-19 Enterprise Survey. ILO Brief. 2020;1–6.
4. Dading Gunadi A, Lesmana H, Fachrizah H, Revindo MD, Rama &, Daniswara V. Dealing With The COVID-19 Pandemic In Indonesia: Msmes’ Coping Strategy, Recovery Path, And Business Transformation. Jurnal Ekonomi Indonesia •. 2022;11:25–62.
5. Salim MN, Susilastuti D, Astuty P. Determinants Of Indonesian MSME Exports And Their Performance During The Covid-19 Pandemic. J Econ Bus. 2021;4(3).
6. Sugeng IS, Komunikasi A, Sarana B, Jakarta I, Rafik A. Pengaruh Kualitas Pelayanan Terhadap Kepuasan Masyarakat Pada Bagian Pelayanan Pembuatan Kartu Tanda Penduduk Elektronik (E-Ktp) Pada Kantor Kelurahan Duren Sawit Jakarta Timur. Vol. 1, Penelitian Ilmu Manajemen. 2018.
7. Pagaddut JG. The Financial Factors Affecting The Financial Performance Of Philippine Msmes. Universal Journal Of Accounting And Finance. 2021;9(6):1524–32.
8. Gomwe G, Potgieter M, Litheko AM. Proposed Framework For Innovative Business Intelligence For Competitive Advantage In Small, Medium And Micro-Organisations In The North West Province Of South Africa. Southern African Journal Of Entrepreneurship And Small Business Management. 2022;14(1):1–10.
9. Mkhonza VM, Sifolo PP. Investigating Small, Medium And Micro-Scale Enterprises Strategic Planning Techniques In Johannesburg Central Business District Post-COVID-19 Lockdown. Southern African Journal Of Entrepreneurship And Small Business Management. 2022;14(1):1–13.
10. Danneels E, Kleinschmidt EJ. Danneels 2001 Product Innovativeness From Firm Perspective.Pdf. Vol. 18, The Journal Of Product Innovation Management. 2001. P. 357–73.
11. Kannan VSKB, N.G. Kannan. Improving The Service Quality Of Ocean Container Carriers: An Indian Case Study. The Eletronic Library. 2012;19(6):709–29.
12. Cooper RG. New Product Strategies: What Distinguishes The Top Performers? Journal Of Product Innovation Management. 1984;1(3):151–64.
13. Crawford CM. Defining The Charter For Product Innovation. 1980;
14. Booz A And HC. New Product Management For The 1980s. 1982;11–8.
15. Syapsan. The Effect Of Service Quality, Innovation Towards Competitive Advantages And Sustainable Economic Growth: Marketing Mix Strategy As Mediating Variable. Benchmarking. 2019;26(4):1336–56.
16. Yoo DK, Park JA. Perceived Service Quality: Analyzing Relationships Among Employees, Customers, And Financial Performance. International Journal Of Quality And Reliability Management. 2007;24(9):908–26.
17. Edvardsson B. Research And Concepts Service Quality Improvement. Managing Service Quality. 1998;8(2):142–9.
18. M.Husnunnida, Alfiana F. Improvement Of Msme Performance Through Behavior Analysis Of Financial Statements Using Accounting Information Technology. Eurasia: Economics & Business. 2019;10(28):42–50.
19. Ombongi PN, Long W. Factors Affecting Financial Performance Of Small And Medium Enterprises (Smes): A Case Of Manufacturing Smes In Kenya. Online) International Journal Of Research In Business Studies And Management. 2018;5(1):37–45.
20. Shuttleworth CC. T He M Anagement A Ccounting. 2014;17(3):336–48.
21. Prawirodipoero GM, Rahadi RA, Hidayat A. The Influence Of Financial Ratios Analysis On The Financial Performance Of Micro Small Medium Enterprises In Indonesia. Review Of Integrative Business And Economics Research. 2019;8(4):393–400.
22. Choi TM, Sethi SP. Innovative Service Operations For Survivals Of Smes Under COVID-19: Two Cases In Hong Kong. IEEE Engineering Management Review. 2021;49(1):50–4.
23. Anning-Dorson T, Odoom RK, Acheampong G, Tweneboah-Koduah E. Innovation And Organizational Development: The Role Of Organizational Leadership. African Journal Of Economic And Management Studies. 2017;8(3):338–51.
24. Hong A, Li X, Wang Y, Shi M. Can Customization Promote Product Innovation In The Global B2B Market? Evidence From Export Manufacturing Firms From Emerging Markets. International Marketing Review. 2023;(72032004).
25. Pan H, Ha HY. Service Quality And Satisfaction In The Context Of Varying Levels Of Restaurant Image And Customer Orientation During The Covid-19 Pandemic. Sustainability (Switzerland). 2021;13(17).
26. Chuenyindee T, Ong AKS, Ramos JP, Prasetyo YT, Nadlifatin R, Kurata YB, Et Al. Public Utility Vehicle Service Quality And Customer Satisfaction In The Philippines During The COVID-19 Pandemic. Util Policy. 2022;75(July 2021):101336.
27. Su Z, Guo H, Sun W. Exploration And Firm Performance: The Moderating Impact Of Competitive Strategy. British Journal Of Management. 2017;28(3):357–71.
28. Kurniawan, Maulana A, Iskandar Y. The Effect Of Technology Adaptation And Government Financial Support On Sustainable Performance Of Msmes During The COVID-19 Pandemic. Cogent Business And Management. 2023;10(1).
29. Kurniawan, Maulana A, Iskandar Y. The Effect Of Technology Adaptation And Government Financial Support On Sustainable Performance Of Msmes During The COVID-19 Pandemic. Cogent Business And Management. 2023;10(1).
30. Henseler J, Hubona G, Ray PA. Using PLS Path Modeling In New Technology Research: Updated Guidelines. Industrial Management And Data Systems. 2016;116(1):2–20.
31. Hair JF, Hult GT, Ringle C, Sarstedt M. A Primer On Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). Sage. 2017. 374 P.
32. Manley SC, Hair JF, Williams RI, Mcdowell WC. Essential New PLS-SEM Analysis Methods For Your Entrepreneurship Analytical Toolbox. International Entrepreneurship And Management Journal. 2021;17(4):1805–25.
33. Hair JF, Hult GT, Ringle C, Sarstedt M. A Primer On Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). Sage. 2017. 374 P.
34. Manley SC, Hair JF, Williams RI, Mcdowell WC. Essential New PLS-SEM Analysis Methods For Your Entrepreneurship Analytical Toolbox. International Entrepreneurship And Management Journal. 2021;17(4):1805–25.
35. Fornell C, Larcker DF. Evaluating Structural Equation Models With Unobservable Variables And Measurement Error. Journal Of Marketing Research. 1981;18(1):39–56.
36. Henseler J, Hubona G, Ray PA. Using PLS Path Modeling In New Technology Research: Updated Guidelines. Industrial Management And Data Systems. 2016;116(1):2–20.
37. Manley SC, Hair JF, Williams RI, Mcdowell WC. Essential New PLS-SEM Analysis Methods For Your Entrepreneurship Analytical Toolbox. International Entrepreneurship And Management Journal. 2021;17(4):1805–25.
38. Anning-Dorson T, Odoom RK, Acheampong G, Tweneboah-Koduah E. Innovation And Organizational Development: The Role Of Organizational Leadership. African Journal Of Economic And Management Studies. 2017;8(3):338–51.
39. Hong A, Li X, Wang Y, Shi M. Can Customization Promote Product Innovation In The Global B2B Market? Evidence From Export Manufacturing Firms From Emerging Markets. International Marketing Review. 2023;(72032004).
40. Pan H, Ha HY. Service Quality And Satisfaction In The Context Of Varying Levels Of Restaurant Image And Customer Orientation During The Covid-19 Pandemic. Sustainability (Switzerland). 2021;13(17).
41. Su Z, Guo H, Sun W. Exploration And Firm Performance: The Moderating Impact Of Competitive Strategy. British Journal Of Management. 2017;28(3):357–71.
42. Cohen J. Statistical Power Analysis For The Behavioral Sciences Second Edition. The SAGE Encyclopedia Of Research Design. 1988.
43. Saeidi SP, Othman MSH. The Mediating Role Of Process And Product Innovation In The Relationship Between Environmental Management Accounting And Firm ’ S Financial Performance Sayedeh Parastoo Saeidi And Mohd Shahwahid Haji Othman *. Int J Business Innovation And Research. 2017;14(4):421–38.
44. Lai-Yin Cheah S, Ho YP, Li S. Search Strategy, Innovation And Financial Performance Of Firms In Process Industries. Technovation. 2021;105(January 2020):102257
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Sunarta, Ash Shoffi Hana Fadhilah, Bagus Pamungkas Wibowo (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The article is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Unless otherwise stated, associated published material is distributed under the same licence.