Unlocking Accurate Data Categorization: The Range Gem+ Approach To Meaningful Intervals For Global Development Perspectives

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56294/sctconf20251434

Keywords:

Class Intervals, Range-Gem+ Method, Data Analysis, Physical Education, Statistical Reporting

Abstract

The old range-based method, which identifies class intervals based on highest and lowest values, struggles to maintain equal class widths, hindering effective data organization and interpretation in fields like social sciences.This study aims to enhance statistical practices in organizing and analyzing data by introducing a novel method to address these shortcomings.To overcome the limitations of the traditional range-based method, this study introduces the Range Gem+ (Plus) Method. By incorporating a new factor, "Gem+," this innovative approach enhances the range-based method, ensuring equal class widths and non-overlapping intervals. The method involves adding the Gem+ factor to the calculation of class intervals. This makes a framework for organizing data that is fair and correct. We evaluated the effectiveness of this method through detailed investigations and practical applications in the context of physical education research.The application of the Range Gem+ Method demonstrated significant improvements in data organization and interpretation. By ensuring equal class widths and eliminating overlapping intervals, the method provided enhanced clarity and reliability in data analysis. The results highlighted the method’s ability to facilitate comparative analysis and support decision-making, particularly in studies involving diverse data sets in physical education research.The Range Gem+ Method offers a novel solution to the limitations of the traditional range-based method. By ensuring equal class widths and non-overlapping intervals, this approach improves data interpretation, enhances comparative analysis, and supports effective decision-making. This method holds promise for broader applications in fields like social sciences, education, and organizational studies, contributing to improved statistical practices and data-driven insights.

References

Hahn GJ, Meeker WQ. Statistical intervals: a guide for practitioners. John Wiley & Sons; 2011 Sep 28.https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470316771

Freedman DA. Statistical models: theory and practice. cambridge university press; 2009 Apr 27.

Molnár P. Properties of range-based volatility estimators. International Review of Financial Analysis. 2012 Jun 1;23:20-9.

Stuart A, Ord K. Kendall's advanced theory of statistics, distribution theory. John Wiley & Sons; 2010 Feb 22.

Doane DP, Seward LE. Measuring skewness: a forgotten statistic?. Journal of statistics education. 2011 Jul 1;19(2).

Limbong A. Peer Review Buku Statistika Bidang Teknologi Informasi. Statistika Bidang Teknologi Informasi. 2021 Apr 10(1).

Grancharova G, Aleksandrova S. MEASURES OF CENTRAL TENDENCY AND DISPERSION. Health Investigation: Analysis-Planning-Evaluation.:73.

Singh P, Mittal N, Salgotra R. Comparison of range-based versus range-free WSNs localization using adaptive SSA algorithm. Wireless Networks. 2022 May;28(4):1625-47.

Yang W, Han A. A new approach for forecasting the price range with financial interval-valued time series data. ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems Part B: Mechanical Engineering. 2015 Jun 1;1(2):021004.https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4030341

Hill TL. Statistical mechanics: principles and selected applications. Courier Corporation; 2013 Apr 26.

Siegel S. Nonparametric statisticsfor the behavioral sciences. Verlag nicht ermittelbar; 1956.

Chrisman NR. Rethinking levels of measurement for cartography. Cartography and Geographic Information Systems. 1998 Jan 1;25(4):231-42.https://doi.org/10.1080/10106049809354657

Johnson RA, Bhattacharyya GK. Statistics: principles and methods. John Wiley & Sons; 2019 Jan 30.

Aarons GA, Reeder K, Miller CJ, Stadnick NA. Identifying strategies to promote team science in dissemination and implementation research. Journal of clinical and translational science. 2020 Jun;4(3):180-7.https://doi.org/10.1017/cts.2020.12

Allen IE, Seaman CA. Likert scales and data analyses. Quality progress. 2007 Jul 1;40(7):64-5.

Spector PE. Job satisfaction: Application, assessment, causes, and consequences. Sage; 1997 Mar 26.

Aytug ZG, Kern MC, Dilchert S. Multicultural experience: Development and validation of a multidimensional scale. International Journal of Intercultural Relations. 2018 Jun 1;65:1-6.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2018.04.002

Hyndman RJ. Computing and graphing highest density regions. The American Statistician. 1996 May 1;50(2):120-6.https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.1996.10473533

Downloads

Published

2025-01-24

How to Cite

1.
Ebardo G, Ayoade Fadare S, Ramos Alcopra A, Ayangco-Derramas C, Kamlian C, Aksan JA, et al. Unlocking Accurate Data Categorization: The Range Gem+ Approach To Meaningful Intervals For Global Development Perspectives. Salud, Ciencia y Tecnología - Serie de Conferencias [Internet]. 2025 Jan. 24 [cited 2025 Apr. 4];4:1434. Available from: https://conferencias.ageditor.ar/index.php/sctconf/article/view/1434