Modern Approaches to Educational Management: European Perspectives on Innovation

Authors

  • Liudmyla Mialkovska Lutsk National Technical University, Faculty of Digital Educational and Social Technologies, Foreign and Ukrainian Philology Department, Lutsk, Ukraine Author https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9044-1496
  • Oksana Maiboroda Lutsk National Technical University, Faculty of Digital Educational and Social Technologies, Department of Social and Humanitarian Technologies, Lutsk, Ukraine Author https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8134-1672
  • Nataliia Koretska Lutsk National Technical University, Faculty of Business and Law, Department of Management, Lutsk, Ukraine Author https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1820-5509
  • Yaroslava Martyniuk Lutsk National Technical University, Faculty of Digital Educational and Social Technologies, Department of Social and Humanitarian Technologies, Lutsk, Ukraine Author https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1982-5112
  • Olena Haponchuk Lutsk National Technical University, Faculty of Digital Educational and Social Technologies, Department of Social and Humanitarian Technologies, Lutsk, Ukraine Author https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8603-277X
  • Liudmyla Korobchuk Lutsk National Technical University, Faculty of Agricultural Technologies and Ecology, Department of Ecology, Lutsk, Ukraine Author https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8760-2992

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56294/sctconf20251479

Keywords:

education, training, digital communications, change management, management of educational institutions, environmental culture

Abstract

Introduction: The steady trend of upgrading approaches in educational management is currently being transformed into optimising the quality of education. This trend is significant against the backdrop of global digitalisation of the educational environment, the need to ensure an adequate level of competitiveness of educational institutions and improve the learning process. The study focuses on analysing the European practice of upgrading education management processes and the study of innovative management concepts for modelling the educational process. The article aims to analyse the concepts of collaboration, adaptability and personalisation in the educational sector against the background of intensive integration of digital technologies, which is typical of the European experience.
Methods: While working on the article, a number of general scientific research methods were used, including analysis of literature sources, comparison, systematisation and generalisation, and the method of expert assessments. The study found that for effective modelling of the educational process, it is necessary to provide a stage of detailed planning for integrating digital solutions. 
Results: The results of the study of the level of objectivity of expert assessments demonstrate that the proper development of management processes in the educational sphere guarantees the quality of the acquired skills of participants in the educational process. The functionality of the system of motivation and control in the context of the success of both general and personalised educational processes is outlined in the example of insights from Europe.
Conclusions: The imperfection of approaches to digital adaptation of the educational process and integration of online education systems is identified. The article proves that modern managerial innovations in the formation of the educational process are the driving force of adequate social progress.

References

1. Sinyaeva O, Krekot M, Zavhorodniy O, Sychova T, Sychov A. Features of the use of information technologies in education. Education. Innovation. Practice. 2023;11(7):98–104. https://doi.org/10.31110/2616-650X-vol11i7-013 DOI: https://doi.org/10.31110/2616-650X-vol11i7-013

2. Onah DFO, Sinclair JE. Assessing Self-Regulation of Learning Dimensions in a Stand-alone MOOC Platform. International Journal of Engineering Pedagogy (iJEP). 2017;7(2):4–21. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijep.v7i2.6511 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3991/ijep.v7i2.6511

3. Nikitenko OV, Oleksenko RI, Kivlyuk OP. Formation of values of digital education and digital man in a digitalised society. Humanities Studies. 2022;10(87):53–63. https://doi.org/10.26661/hst-2022-10-87-06 DOI: https://doi.org/10.26661/hst-2022-10-87-06

4. Statista. “Online Education – Europe”. Statista Market Insights. 2023. Available in: https://www.statista.com/outlook/emo/online-education/europe. Accessed on October 20, 2024.

5. Voichenko DV. Innovations in education management: transformation of the modern system. Innovations and scientific potential of the world: materials of the III International Scientific Conference, pp. 211–213. International Center for Scientific Research. UKRLOGOS Group LLC; 2023. Available in: http://surl.li/urfqh. Accessed on January 10, 2024.

6. Zhao Y, Llorente AMP, Gómez MCS. Digital competence in higher education research: A systematic literature review. Computers & Education. 2021:168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104212 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104212

7. Kuhail MA, ElSayary A, Farooq S, Alghamdi A. Exploring immersive learning experiences: A survey. Informatics. 2022;9(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/informatics9040075 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/informatics9040075

8. Eker B, Eker AA. Quality criteria in universities. Journal of Innovations in Business and Industry. 2023;1(02): 65-70. https://doi.org/10.61552/JIBI.2023.02.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.61552/JIBI.2023.02.002

9. Veber M, Pesek I, Aberšek B. Implementation of the Modern Immersive Learning Model CPLM. Applied Sciences (Switzerland). 2022;12(6):3090. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12063090 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/app12063090

10. Gallagher SE, Savage T. Challenge-based learning in higher education: an exploratory literature review. Teaching in Higher Education. 2023;28(6):1135-1157. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2020.1863354 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2020.1863354

11. Lee VW, Hodgson P, Chan CS, Fong A, Cheung SW. Optimising the learning process with immersive virtual reality and non-immersive virtual reality in an educational environment. International Journal of Mobile Learning and Organisation. 2020;14(1):21-35. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMLO.2020.103908 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMLO.2020.103908

12. Adiyono A, Fadhilatunnisa A, Rahmat NA, Munawarroh N. Skills of Islamic religious education teachers in class management. Al-Hayat: Journal of Islamic Education. 2022;6(1):104–115. https://doi.org/10.35723/ajie.v6i1.229 DOI: https://doi.org/10.35723/ajie.v6i1.229

13. European Commission Digital Education Action Plan. 2021–2027; 2021. Available in: https://ec.europa.eu/education/education-in-the-eu/digital-education-action-plan_en. Accessed on January 10, 2024.

14. Mialkovska L, Zhvaniia L, Voitenko I. Environmental culture of modern media in Ukraine. Frontiers of Printing: a Scientific Journal. 2023;2(14):140-153. https://doi.org/10.20535/2522-1078.2023.2(14).295278 DOI: https://doi.org/10.20535/2522-1078.2023.2(14).295278

15. Mialkovska L, Redchuk R, Sushyk I, Martyniuk Y, Maiboroda O, Savchuk N. Social Management and Digital Communications as Important Components of Modern Higher Education. Cadernos de educacao tecnologia e sociedade. 2023;16(1):143–152. https://doi.org/10.14571/brajets.v16.n1.143-152 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14571/brajets.v16.n1.143-152

16. Radkevych V, Kravets S, Herliand T, Radkevych O, Kozak A. Modern technologies in the development of professional competence in teachers from professional (vocational) education schools. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. 2021;1840. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1840/1/012041 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1840/1/012041

17. Naji KK, Ebead U, Al-Ali AK, Du X. Comparing models of problem and project-based learning (PBL) courses and student engagement in civil engineering in Qatar. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education. 2020;16(8):1–16. https://doi.org/10.29333/EJMSTE/8291 DOI: https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/8291

18. Terzi S, Zourou K, Stamelos I. Information and communication technologies supporting the standardisation of credentials among MOOC providers. In ICERI2022 Proceedings. IATED; 2022:6910–6919. https://doi.org/10.21125/iceri.2022.1753 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21125/iceri.2022.1753

19. Falcione S, Campbell E, McCollum B, Chamberlain J, Macias M, Morsch L, Pinder C. Emergence of Different Perspectives of Success in Collaborative Learning. The Canadian Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning. 2019;10(2):1–23. https://doi.org/10.5206/cjsotl-rcacea.2019.2.8227 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5206/cjsotl-rcacea.2019.2.8227

20. Gamage D, Perera I, Fernando S. MOOCs lack interactivity and collaborativeness: evaluating MOOC platforms. International Journal of Engineering Pedagogy (iJEP). 2020;10(2):94–111. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijep.v10i2.11886 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3991/ijep.v10i2.11886

21. Mialkovska L, Herasymchuk H, Sushyk I, Martyniuk Y, Haponchuk O, Melnychuk Y. Management models and methods in modern education: information technologies, sustainability and development. Cadernos de Educação Tecnologia e Sociedade. 2023;16(se2):94–108. Available in: https://doi.org/10.14571/brajets.v16.nse2.94-108 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14571/brajets.v16.nse2.94-108

22. Ramadhani VY, Khusniati M. Development of Interactive E-Books containing Virtual Laboratory to Improve Students’ Motivation Learning. Journal of Environmental and Science Education (JESE). 2022;2(1):49–57. https://doi.org/10.15294/jese.v2i1.53125 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15294/jese.v2i1.53125

23. Canaran Ö, Mirici İH. An Overview of the Recent Views and Practices in Teacher Professional Development. Eğitimde Kuram ve Uygulama. 2019;15(4):350–362. https://doi.org/10.17244/eku.559281 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17244/eku.559281

24. Adiyono A, Hayat EW, Oktavia ED, Prasetiyo NT. Learning interaction in the digital era: Technological innovations and education management strategies to enhance student engagement. Journal of Research in Instructional. 2024;4(1):205–221. https://doi.org/10.30862/jri.v4i1.333 DOI: https://doi.org/10.30862/jri.v4i1.333

25. van den Bergh D, van Doorn J, Marsman M, Draws T, van Kesteren E, Derks K, Wagenmakers EA. Tutorial on Conducting and Interpreting a Bayesian ANOVA in JASP. L’Année psychologique. 2020;120:73–96. https://doi.org/10.3917/anpsy1.201.0073 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3917/anpsy1.201.0073

26. van Doorn, J., Ly, A., Marsman, M., & Wagenmakerss, E.-J. (2020). Bayesian rank-based hypothesis testing for the rank sum test, the signed rank test, and Spearman's ρ. Journal of Applied Statistics, 47(16), 2984-3006. https://doi.org/10.1080/02664763.2019.1709053 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02664763.2019.1709053

27. Cleophas TJ, Zwinderman AH. Bayesian paired T-Test. Bayesian Paired T-Test. In Modern Bayesian Statistics in Clinical Research, pp. 49–58. Springer; 2018. Available in: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92747-3_5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92747-3_5

28. Gronau, Q. F., Ly, A., & Wagenmakers, E.-J. (2020). Informed Bayesian t-tests. American Statistician, 74(2), 137-143. https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.2018.1562983. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.2018.1562983

Downloads

Published

2025-02-13

Issue

Vol. 4 (2025): Salud, Ciencia y Tecnología - Serie de Conferencias

Section

Original

License

Copyright (c) 2025 Liudmyla Mialkovska, Oksana Maiboroda, Nataliia Koretska , Yaroslava Martyniuk , Olena Haponchuk , Liudmyla Korobchuk (Author)

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

The article is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Unless otherwise stated, associated published material is distributed under the same licence.

How to Cite

1.
Mialkovska L, Maiboroda O, Koretska N, Martyniuk Y, Haponchuk O, Korobchuk L. Modern Approaches to Educational Management: European Perspectives on Innovation. Salud, Ciencia y Tecnología - Serie de Conferencias [Internet]. 2025 Feb. 13 [cited 2025 Apr. 24];4:1479. Available from: https://conferencias.ageditor.ar/index.php/sctconf/article/view/1479