Integrating Mediation into Public Administration: Lessons from European Practices
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56294/sctconf20251504Keywords:
mediation, public administration, conflict resolution, institutionalisation, European experienceAbstract
Introduction: Mediation is now essential for resolving public administration disputes, which reduces social tensions and promotes trust in public institutions. The present study attempts to answer questions on the effectiveness of mediation in public administration, particularly on the institutionalisation of this institution in the EU countries and on the feasibility of mediation application in Ukraine. The research aims to evaluate the European experience of institutionalising mediation, to uncover the possibilities for applying mediation procedures in the Ukraine, and the general research objectives are to study the operational efficiency of mediation in public administration. This study is to analyze extant mediation models, compare their effectiveness in other countries and address success factors of different factors and suggesting European experience adaptation to Ukrainian context.
Methods: The research methodology includes quantitative and qualitative methods: The research methods employed were questionnaires, semi-structured interviews, case studies and comparative analysis.
Results: The study revealed that mediation is an effective conflict resolution mechanism that facilitates the decrease in the number of bilateral court disputes, reduces the duration of conflict resolution, and increases confidence in government institutions.
Conclusions: The practical significance of the findings lies in developing recommendations to improve the legislative framework, creating regional mediation centres, and supporting this tool among the citizens. These measures will help decrease social conflicts and improve efficiency in the administrative processes in Ukraine. The institutionalisation of mediation procedures has been found, based on European experience, to enhance the democratisation of governance and to increase the transparency and efficiency of administrative processes.
References
1. Hermakivska I. Mediation: European experience, Ukrainian realities and prospects. Ûridična Ukraïna. 2019;1:6-9. https://doi.org/10.37749/2308-9636-2020-1(205)-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.37749/2308-9636-2020-1(205)-1
2. Fellegi B. Building and toning: An analysis of the institutionalisation of mediation in penal matters in Hungary. Temida. 2011;14(1):21-36. https://doi.org/10.2298/tem1101021f DOI: https://doi.org/10.2298/TEM1101021F
3. Carey H, Mitchell SM. European regional effects on legalisation." In Legalisation of International Law and Politics; 2023. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-17169-7_7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-17169-7_7
4. González-Medina M, Hurtado SDG. Metropolitan governance in Madrid: Institutionalisation and models from a policy perspective. In J. M. Feria-Toribio, R. Iglesias-Pascual and F. Benassi (Eds.). Socio-Spatial Dynamics in Mediterranean Europe (Vol. 3); 2024. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-55436-0_17 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-55436-0_17
5. Nykolaieva V. Modern models of public administration in EU countries: Implementation experience. Universytetsʹkì Naukovì Zapiski. 2019:38 47. https://doi.org/10.37491/unz.72.4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.37491/UNZ.72.4
6. Nedilko AI. Improvement of regulatory support for public administration based on the experience of European countries. Publichne Upravlinnia i Administruvannia v Ukraini. 2019;13:65 68. https://doi.org/10.32843/2663-5240-2019-13-12 DOI: https://doi.org/10.32843/2663-5240-2019-13-12
7. Csilla M. Benefits with mediation? Conflict management in Hungarian public administration. Technology, Engineering, Management, Entrepreneurship, Learning - International Journal. 2022;6(1):21-29. https://doi.org/10.52576/temel226.1021c DOI: https://doi.org/10.52576/TEMEL226.1021c
8. Defraigne JC. A Marxian analysis of the European construction I: Origins. In M. De Nanteuil and A. Fjeld (Eds.). Marx and Europe; 2024. Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-53736-3_3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-53736-3_3
9. Omobowale AO, Akanle O, Busari D. Social science foundations of public policy. In ER Aiyede and B Muganda (Eds.). Public Policy and Research in Africa; 2023, p. 29–61. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-99724-3_3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-99724-3_3
10. Van Dijk F. Perceptions of judicial independence in European countries. In Perceptions of the Independence of Judges in Europe. Springer International Publishing; 2020, p. 29–51. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-63143-7_3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-63143-7_3
11. de Pinho HDB. Side-effects of the growing trend towards the institutionalisation of mediation. Panorama of Brazilian Law. 2018;1(1):187 221. https://doi.org/10.17768/pbl.v1i1.34367 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17768/pbl.v1i1.p187-221
12. ParkhomenkoO, Neskorodeva I, Kvitka Y, Babenko K. Mediation as a component of conflict management: Experience of European Union countries and its implementation in Ukraine. Adaptivne Upravlìnnâ: Theory and Practice. Ekonomìka. 2019;7(14). https://doi.org/10.33296/2707-0654-7(14)-10 DOI: https://doi.org/10.33296/2707-0654-7(14)-10
13. de Oliveira FS, Bonacelli MBM. Institutionalisation of research administration in Brazil: Some evidence. Journal of Technology Management and Innovation. 2019;14(2):69-80. https://doi.org/10.4067/s0718-27242019000200069 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-27242019000200069
14. European Mediation Network Initiative. Annual report on mediation in the European Union; 2023. [cited: 13 January 2025] Available in https://emni.org/reports/2023.
15. Rahman SMS, Hossain MI. Institutionalisation of technological innovations in the public sector of Bangladesh. Bangladesh Journal of Public Administration. 2021;29(2):102-115. https://doi.org/10.36609/bjpa.v29i2.221 DOI: https://doi.org/10.36609/bjpa.v29i2.221
16. Melenko O, Stratiy O, Hrindei L. Administrative mediation in the light of institutional transformations in Ukraine. Scientific Vìsnik Užgorodsʹkogo Nationalʹnogo Unìversitetu. Serìâ Pravo. 2022;68:180-185. https://doi.org/10.24144/2307-3322.2021.68.30 DOI: https://doi.org/10.24144/2307-3322.2021.68.30
17. Michałski T, Kopeć K. Implementation of monitoring of the quality of public services at the local level as a tool for reforming public administration – The Polish experience. Questions of Public and Municipal Administration. 2021;6:128-145. https://doi.org/10.17323/1999-5431-2021-0-6-128-145 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17323/1999-5431-2021-0-6-128-145
18. Katkova S. The institutionalisation of the national public relations industry in Italy. Computational Geophysics. 2021;5:27-32. https://doi.org/10.31618/essa.2782-1994.2021.5.68.32 DOI: https://doi.org/10.31618/ESSA.2782-1994.2021.5.68.32
19. Goulet V. The Ombudsman of the France 2 television newsroom: Institutionalisation of an ideal public. Questions de Communication. 2004;5:281 299. https://doi.org/10.4000/questionsdecommunication.7117 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4000/questionsdecommunication.7117
20. Council of Europe. 2022. Promoting mediation in public administration. Strasbourg: Council of Europe. Available at https://rm.coe.int/cepej-2022-11-promoting-administrative-mediation-en-adopted/1680a95692 (last accessed 21 December 2022).
21. Huang H. Integration of law and diplomacy. In Modern China and International Economic Law. Singapore: Springer Nature; 2024, p. 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-1968-6_1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-1968-6_1
22. Halásková M, Halásková R, Prokop V. Evaluation of efficiency in selected areas of public services in European Union countries. Sustainability. 2018;10(12):4592. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10124592 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su10124592
23. Mavhungu D, Bussin M. The mediating role of motivation between leadership and public sector performance. SA Journal of Human Resource Management. 2017;1(2):11. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajhrm.v15i0.840 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/sajhrm.v15i0.840
24. Lombardinilo A. The lure of rhetoric: Jürgen Habermas and the faltering European project. In The Lure of Communication. London: Palgrave Macmillan; 2024. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-96084-2_10 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-96084-2_10
25. Zaharia-Rădulescu A-M, Radu I. Cloud computing and public administration: Approaches in several European countries. Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence. 2017;11(1):739-749. https://doi.org/10.1515/picbe-2017-0078 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/picbe-2017-0078
26. Liebert S, Condrey SE, Goncharov D. Public administration in post-communist countries. In Public Administration and Public Policy. Florida: CRC Press; 2013. https://doi.org/10.1201/b14237 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1201/b14237
27. National Mediation Statistics Reports. Mediation usage statistics for Germany, France, Sweden, Poland, Italy, and Spain. National Institutes of Public Administration; 2023.
28. Melnychenko AA, Radchenko YuV. Implementation of mediation tools in public administration practice. Vìsnik Akademìi Mitnoï Službi Ukraïni. Ser: Deržavne Upravlìnnâ. 2020;2(25):104-110. https://doi.org/10.32836/2310-9653-2020-2.19 DOI: https://doi.org/10.32836/2310-9653-2020-2.19
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Viktor Shcherbak, Nataliia Donii, Svitlana Nishchymna, Liubov Plotka, Galina Tregubenko (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The article is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Unless otherwise stated, associated published material is distributed under the same licence.
