Research on the mechanism of fertility support measures to increase the fertility rate
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56294/sctconf20251523Keywords:
Fertility Support, Fertility Rate, Population, Financial Incentives, Childcare, Parental Leave PoliciesAbstract
Introduction:
Declining fertility rates present significant challenges to socioeconomic stability and population sustainability worldwide. Fertility support measures, including financial incentives, childcare, and parental leave policies, are crucial yet their effectiveness varies across different socioeconomic and cultural contexts. The aim is to examine the mechanisms of fertility support measures, such as economic, social, and health policies, and determine the effective strategies for increasing fertility rates and promoting family well-being.
Methods:
A mixed-methods approach was adopted, combining quantitative information from national fertility trends with qualitative insights collected from interviews and surveys conducted with a target population of 200 individuals. This methodology allows for a comprehensive understanding of the factors influencing fertility decisions.
Results:
The findings underscore the importance of aligning fertility policies with broader social and economic frameworks to enhance their effectiveness. Key themes identified include the necessity of integrating fertility support into wider family welfare initiatives, addressing gender equity concerns, and creating a supportive environment for parenting.
Conclusions:
This research contributes to understanding targeted interventions aimed at countering fertility decline and offers valuable insights for policymakers seeking sustainable solutions to this global issue. A holistic strategy that encompasses various aspects of family welfare is recommended to increase fertility rates effectively.
References
[1] Turrini M, Otín‐Gavín J. Let ‘Pregnant Women Choose the Destiny for Themselves and Their Child’. How Fertility Clinic Digital Platforms Frame Preimplantation Genetic Testing (PGT) in Spain. Sociology of Health & Illness. 2025 Jan;47(1):e13876. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9566.13876 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9566.13876
[2] Belachew KG, Minale WK. Socioeconomic and Environmental Impacts of Eucalyptus Plantations in Ethiopia: An Evaluation of Benefits, Challenges, and Sustainable Practices. The Scientific World Journal. 2025;2025(1):1780293. https://doi.org/10.1155/tswj/1780293 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/tswj/1780293
[3] Kumar A, Meena B. A comparative analysis of the Holt and ARIMA models for predicting the future total fertility rate in India. Life Cycle Reliability and Safety Engineering. 2025 Jan 3:1-0. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41872-024-00287-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41872-024-00287-1
[4] Chen Z, Tian X. The relaxation of birth control policies adversely affects women's income: Evidence from China's universal two-child policy. China Economic Review. 2025 Apr 1;90:102340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chieco.2024.102340 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chieco.2024.102340
[5] Garha NS, Azevedo AB. Demography and Housing: Challenges and opportunities for Lisbon’s housing prospects from 2022 to 2051. Cities. 2025 Mar 1;158:105665. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2024.105665 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2024.105665
[6] Kim M, Kim I. The second generation’s perceptions of South Korea’s public support programs for multicultural families. Ethnic and Racial Studies. 2025 Apr 26:1-9.https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870.2024.2436071 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870.2024.2436071
[7] Ibupoto MH, Shah AA, Loong A. Son Preference, Modern Contraception, and Fertility Intention in the Context of Polygyny in Pakistan: Evidence From Demographic and Health Survey 2017–2018. American Journal of Human Biology. 2025 Jan;37(1):e24205..https://doi.org/10.1002/ajhb.24205 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ajhb.24205
[8] Skirbekk V, Blekesaune M, Sunde HF. Personality and fertility dynamics in Norway across four decades–Findings from the HUNT survey. Personality and Individual Differences. 2025 Feb 1;233:112862. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2024.112862 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2024.112862
[9] Du J, King C. Heterogeneous fertility reponses to the two-child policy: growth-induced domestic migration and income effect. Applied Economics. 2025 Jan 11:1-7. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2025.2449619 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2025.2449619
[10] Fathi B, Kia S, Alinejad V, Rikhtegar E, Gebleh F, Zareipour M. Sexual self-care, quality of sexual life and fertility desire in women attending comprehensive health centers in Urmia, Iran. BMC Women's Health. 2025 Jan 10;25(1):16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-024-03532-y DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-024-03532-y
[11] Tippett A. Life on pause: An analysis of UK fertility patients’ coping mechanisms after the cancellation of fertility treatment due to COVID-19. Journal of Health Psychology. 2022 Jun;27(7):1583-600. https://doi.org/10.1177/1359105321999711 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1359105321999711
[12] Zhang L, Liu J, Lummaa V. Intention to have a second child, family support and actual fertility behavior in current China: an evolutionary perspective. American Journal of Human Biology. 2022 Apr;34(4):e23669. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajhb.23669 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ajhb.23669
[13] Chen T, Hou P, Wu T, Yang J. The impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on fertility intentions of women with childbearing age in China. Behavioral Sciences. 2022 Sep 15;12(9):335. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs12090335 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/bs12090335
[14] Buratini J, Dellaqua TT, Dal Canto M, La Marca A, Carone D, Mignini Renzini M, Webb R. The putative roles of FSH and AMH in the regulation of oocyte developmental competence: from fertility prognosis to mechanisms underlying age-related subfertility. Human Reproduction Update. 2022 Mar 1;28(2):232-54. https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmab044 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmab044
[15] Yan H, Freschet GT, Wang H, Hogan JA, Li S, Valverde‐Barrantes OJ, Fu X, Wang R, Dai X, Jiang L, Meng S. Mycorrhizal symbiosis pathway and edaphic fertility frame root economics space among tree species. New Phytologist. 2022 Jun;234(5):1639-53.https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.18066 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.18066
[16] Harknett K, Billari FC, Medalia C. Do family support environments influence fertility? Evidence from 20 European countries. European Journal of Population. 2014 Feb;30:1-33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10680-013-9308-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10680-013-9308-3
[17] Zhang TT, Cai XY, Shi XH, Zhu W, Shan SN. The effect of family fertility support policies on fertility, their contribution, and policy pathways to fertility improvement in OECD Countries. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2023 Mar 8;20(6):4790. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20064790 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20064790
[18] Nevarez PL, Álvarez-Tavares I, Simental JT, Leyva-Corona J, Medrano JF, Thomas MG, Zamorano-Algandar R, Nieblas-López MI. Polimorfismo del gen PAPPA2 asociado con la fertilidad postparto en vacas lecheras de raza Holstein manejadas bajo condiciones cálidas en el sur de Sonora México. Biotecnia. 2024 Dec 6;26:e2261.https://doi.org/10.18633/biotecnia.v26.2261 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18633/biotecnia.v26.2261
[19] Peña Díaz SI. Participación del factor inhibitorio de leucemia en los niveles de acetilcolina y en la foliculogénesis ovárica en rata.10.58011/ryyp-by07.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Jiatong Liu (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The article is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Unless otherwise stated, associated published material is distributed under the same licence.
