The Effectiveness Of The Distance Learning Policy In The Riau Islands Province-Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56294/sctconf20251526Keywords:
CIPP Model, Effectiveness of Distance Learning Policies, Distance Learning in Accounting CoursesAbstract
Introduction: This study investigated the effectiveness of distance learning in the Riau Islands, employing a mixed-methods approach with a sequential exploratory design.
Methods: The study was conducted in two phases: the first utilized a quantitative approach, and the second applied a qualitative method. The population consisted of tutors and students from the Open University of Batam (Indonesian: Universitas Terbuka Batam). Data collection methods included observations, surveys, interviews, and document analysis.
Results: The findings indicated that, based on the student survey, the effectiveness of distance learning was 74.68%, categorized as effective. While the effectiveness indicators generally fell within the “effective” range, the implementation of distance learning in the Riau Islands had not yet reached the optimal percentage for the “effective” category. Several challenges impacted its effectiveness, including a low culture of independent learning among students, limited responsiveness of tutors outside class hours, and technical issues such as poor network connectivity and digital literacy barriers. Nonetheless, several supporting factors contributed to the effectiveness of distance learning, such as the innovative nature of the learning system, cost efficiency, and the flexibility that enabled students to engage in learning anytime and anywhere. Using the Context, Input, Process, and Product (CIPP) Model, the study framework focused on designing tutorial activities, tutorial activity units, the question bank, and assessment rubrics.
Conclusions: The variable indicators fall within the “effective” category, the implementation of distance learning for students in the Riau Islands has not yet reached the maximum percentage range for the practical category.
References
1. Belawati, Tian.EBOOK Pembelajaran Online.Banten.Universitas Terbuka. 2019
2. Abad-Segura E, González-Zamar MD, Infante-Moro JC, García GR. Sustainable Management of Digital Transformation in Higher Education: Global Research Trends. Sustainability 2020, Vol 12, Page 2107 [Internet]. 2020 Mar 9 [cited 2025 Feb 8];12(5):2107. Available from: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/5/2107/htm DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su12052107
3. Sugiyono. Metode Penelitian Kebijakan . Ratri SY, editor. Bandung: Alfabeta; 2017.
4. Farajollahi M, Zarifsanaee N. Distance Teaching and Learning in Higher Education: A Conceptual Model. In: International Perspectives of Distance Learning in Higher Education. InTech; 2012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5772/35321
5. Abumandour EST. Applying e-learning system for engineering education – challenges and obstacles. Journal of Research in Innovative Teaching and Learning. 2022 Oct 20;15(2):150–69. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JRIT-06-2021-0048
6. Cameron, E., & Green, M. (2019). Making Sense of Change Management A Complete Guide to the Models, Tools and Techniques of Organizational Change. Kogan Page Publishers. - References - Scientific Research Publishing [Internet]. [cited 2025 Feb 8]. Available from: https://www.scirp.org/reference/referencespapers?referenceid=3562662
7. Zaheer M, Munir S. Research supervision in distance learning: issues and challenges. Asian Association of Open Universities Journal. 2020 Jul 3;15(1):131–43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/AAOUJ-01-2020-0003
8. Kundu A. Toward a framework for strengthening participants’ self-efficacy in online education. Asian Association of Open Universities Journal. 2020 Dec 1;15(3):351–70. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/AAOUJ-06-2020-0039
9. Dash BM. Perception towards quality and effectiveness of social work education through open and distance learning: A study in Delhi. Asian Association of Open Universities Journal. 2019 Nov 14;14(1):64–83. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/AAOUJ-06-2019-0023
10. Kamal T, Illiyan A. School teachers’ perception and challenges towards online teaching during COVID-19 pandemic in India: an econometric analysis. [cited 2025 Feb 8]; Available from: http://creativecommons.
11. Bozkurt A, Sharma RC. Emergency remote teaching in a time of global crisis due to CoronaVirus pandemic. Asian Journal of Distance Education [Internet]. 15(1):2020. Available from: http://www.asianjde.org
12. Zuhairi A, Hsueh ACT, Chiang ICN. Empowering lifelong learning through open universities in Taiwan and Indonesia. Asian Association of Open Universities Journal. 2020 Oct 19;15(2):167–88. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/AAOUJ-12-2019-0059
13. Aladwan F, Al-Shboul M, Awamrah A Al. Distance Education, Blended Learning and E-Learning Predictions and Possibilities. Mod Appl Sci. 2018 Oct 14;13(2):192. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5539/mas.v13n2p192
14. Ilyas A, Zaman MK. An evaluation of online students’ persistence intentions. Asian Association of Open Universities Journal. 2020 Oct 19;15(2):207–22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/AAOUJ-11-2019-0053
15. Zuhairi A, Karthikeyan N, Priyadarshana ST. Supporting students to succeed in open and distance learning in the Open University of Sri Lanka and Universitas Terbuka Indonesia. Asian Association of Open Universities Journal. 2020 Jul 3;15(1):13–35. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/AAOUJ-09-2019-0038
16. Attiogbe EJK, Oheneba-Sakyi Y, Kwapong OATF, Boateng J. Assessing the relationship between feedback strategies and learning improvement from a distance learning perspective. Journal of Research in Innovative Teaching and Learning. 2023; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JRIT-10-2022-0061
17. Laosum T. Development of indicators of happiness in learning of Thai open university students. Asian Association of Open Universities Journal [Internet]. 2023 May 31;18(1):61–77. Available from: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/AAOUJ-10-2022-0144/full/html DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/AAOUJ-10-2022-0144
18. Aisha N, Ratra A. Online education amid COVID-19 pandemic and its opportunities, challenges and psychological impacts among students and teachers: a systematic review. Vol. 17, Asian Association of Open Universities Journal. Emerald Publishing; 2022. p. 242–60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/AAOUJ-03-2022-0028
19. MacQueen H, Aiken FJ. Supporting distance-taught students in the workplace. Higher Education, Skills and Work-based Learning. 2020 Jan 20;10(1):49–60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/HESWBL-04-2019-0048
20. Walberg, H.J. “A psychological theory of educational productivity”, in Farley, F.H. and Gordon, N. (Eds), Psychological and Education, National Society for the Study of Education, Chicago, 1981. pp. 81-110.
21. Serdyukov P. Formalism in online education. Journal of Research in Innovative Teaching & Learning. 2021 Jul 12;14(2):118–32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JRIT-02-2021-0010
22. Aryal A, Balan S. Evaluation of a technical information systems module for distance learning during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Research in Innovative Teaching and Learning. 2023 Mar 30;16(1):53–66. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JRIT-11-2021-0078
23. Saumya, Singh T. Open and distance learning in social work programme: a study of MSW learners of India. Asian Association of Open Universities Journal. 2020 Dec 1;15(3):371–93. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/AAOUJ-07-2020-0050
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Diah Amalia, Febrina Wulandari, Alfonsa Dian Sumarna, Arif Darmawan (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The article is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Unless otherwise stated, associated published material is distributed under the same licence.
