International legal and theoretical perspectives on general secondary education
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56294/sctconf20251573Keywords:
education, legislative educational framework, general secondary education, educational programme, scientific community, educational-social inclusionAbstract
Introduction: The article addresses the problem of defining the conceptual and categorical framework and systematic features of the definition of the term "general secondary education".
Objective: The article examines the level of informational-psychological safety and psychological safety indicators and their relationship with resilience indicators have been studied.
Methods: General scientific methods were employed, such as analysing scientific sources, systematisation, generalisation method, survey.
Results: It has been determined that interpreting the aspects of achieving educational outcomes in the general secondary education system through the prism of the legislative framework has a conceptual appropriation. However, it requires expansion in matters of subject-practical regulation at the level of the corresponding educational environment, such as general secondary education and other previously mentioned educational clusters. The necessity of introducing an integration approach to intra-educational equality by each educational institution has been established. This may cause inconsistencies in implementing national legislative provisions at the local level.
Conclusions: Thus, a set of proposals by the educational sector's legislator aimed at improving the gender-social components of acquiring professional knowledge in general educational institutions could serve as a mechanism for resolving such situational conflicts. These proposals could subsequently be incorporated by general secondary education institutions into their statutory and regulatory programmatic documentation, proportionally reflecting the peculiarities of their functioning.
References
1. Jedličková T, Svobodová A, Kachlík V. Geology at the Lower Secondary Educational Level (ISCED 2): Comparison of the Czech Republic, Estonia, Slovenia and Poland: Comparison of the Czech Republic, Estonia, Slovenia and Poland. Scientia in educatione. [Internet] 2019 [cited: 06 December 2024];10(3):72-93. Available in: https://doi.org/10.14712/18047106.1265 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14712/18047106.1265
2. Brown EE. The Making of Our Middle Schools. An Account of the Development of Secondary Education in the United States. Creative Media Partners, LLC; 2023. 568 p.
3. Middeldorp MM, Edzes AJ, Van Dijk J. Smoothness of the school-to-work transition: general versus vocational upper-secondary education. European Sociological Review. [Internet] 2019 [cited: 06 December 2024];35(1):81-97. Available in: https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcy043 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcy043
4. Steele KP. New Perspectives on the History of the Twentieth-Century American High School. Springer International Publishing; [Internet] 2021 [cited: 06 December 2024]. 364 p. Available in: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-79922-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-79922-9
5. Casanova D, Di Napoli R, Leijon M. Which space? Whose space? An experience in involving students and teachers in space design. Teaching in Higher Education. [Internet] 2018 [cited: 06 December 2024];23(4):488-503. Available in: https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2017.1414785 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2017.1414785
6. Kariippanon KE, Cliff DP, Lancaster SL, Okely AD, Parrish AM. Perceived interplay between flexible learning spaces and teaching, learning and student wellbeing. Learning Environments Research. [Internet] 2018 [cited: 06 December 2024];21:301-320. Available in: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-017-9254-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-017-9254-9
7. Chipamaunga S, Prozesky D. How students experience integration and perceive development of the ability to integrate learning. Advances in Health Sciences Education. [Internet] 2019 [cited: 06 December 2024];24:65-84. Available in: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-018-9850-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-018-9850-1
8. Cerna L, Mezzanotte C, Rutigliano A, Brussino O, Santiago P, Borogrove F, Guthrie C. Promoting inclusive education for diverse societies: A conceptual framework. OECD Education Working Papers. [Internet] 2021 [cited: 06 December 2024];260. OECD Publishing, Paris. Available in: https://doi.org/10.1787/94ab68c6-en DOI: https://doi.org/10.1787/94ab68c6-en
9. Dello-Iacovo B. Curriculum reform and ‘quality education’in China: An overview. International journal of educational development. [Internet] 2009 [cited: 06 December 2024];29(3):241-249. Available in: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2008.02.008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2008.02.008
10. Garrouste C. 100 Years of Educational Reforms in Europe: a contextual database. Doctoral dissertation. European Commission's Joint Research Centre (JRC); [Internet] 2010 [cited: 06 December 2024]. Available in: https://hal.science/hal-03245325/document
11. Jónasdóttir M, Ragnarsdóttir G, Eiríksdóttir E. Cascading effect of upper secondary education policy reform: the experiences and perspectives of university teachers. Education Inquiry. [Internet] 2023 [cited: 06 December 2024]:1-21. Available in: https://doi.org/10.1080/20004508.2023.2207297 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/20004508.2023.2207297
12. Steiner-Khamsi G, Jóhannesdóttir K, Magnúsdóttir BR. The school-autonomy-with-accountability reform in Iceland: looking back and making sense. Nordic Journal of Studies in Educational Policy. [Internet] 2024 [cited: 06 December 2024];10(3):180-198. Available in: https://doi.org/10.1080/20020317.2024.2375087 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/20020317.2024.2375087
13. Madalińska-Michalak J. School Policy and Reforms in Poland in the Light of Decentralisation: Between Democratisation and Centralisation. In: School Policy Reform in Europe: Exploring Transnational Alignments, National Particularities and Contestations (pp. 187-211). Cham: Springer International Publishing; [Internet] 2023 [cited: 06 December 2024]. Available in: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-35434-2_9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-35434-2_9
14. Dvořák D, Simonová J, Vyhnálek J, Gal P. Days After a Choice Is Made: Transitions to Professional and Vocational Upper Secondary Schools in Czechia. Studia paedagogica. [Internet] 2023 [cited: 06 December 2024];27(4). Available in: https://doi.org/10.5817/SP2022-4-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5817/SP2022-4-1
15. Mirazchiyski EK, Štremfel U, Alfirević N, Čačija LN. Education Policies and Reforms in Slovenia and Croatia: Shared History, Diverging Paths. In: School Policy Reform in Europe: Exploring Transnational Alignments, National Particularities and Contestations. (pp. 237-259). Cham: Springer International Publishing; [Internet] 2023 [cited: 06 December 2024]. Available in: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-35434-2_11 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-35434-2_11
16. Stronati C. The design of upper secondary education across OECD countries: Managing choice, coherence and specialisation. OECD Education Working Papers. [Internet] 2023 [cited: 06 December 2024];288. OECD Publishing, Paris. Available in: https://doi.org/10.1787/158101f0-en DOI: https://doi.org/10.1787/158101f0-en
17. Kushnir I. The Role of the European Education Area in European Union Integration in Times of Crises. European Review. [Internet] 2022 [cited: 06 December 2024];30(3):301–321. Available in: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1062798721000016 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1062798721000016
18. Viarengo M. European Commission and European Expert Network on Economics of Education EENEE. Gender Gaps in Education: Evidence and Policy Implications. EENEE Analytical Report No. 46. Prepared for the European Commission; 2021. 53 p.
19. Shcherbinina SA, Mykhailenko AS, Svyrydenko VO. Study of the level of development of the economic potential of the enterprise. Efficient economy. [Internet] 2020 [cited: 06 December 2024];1:1-12. Available in: https://doi.org/10.32702/2307-2105-2020.1.85 DOI: https://doi.org/10.32702/2307-2105-2020.1.85
20. Day WH, McMorris FR. A formalisation of consensus index methods. Bulletin of Mathematical Biology. [Internet] 1985 [cited: 06 December 2024];47(2):215-229. Available in: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0092-8240(85)90049-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0092-8240(85)90049-7
21. Nazari-Shirkouhi S, Mousakhani S, Tavakoli M, Dalvand MR, Šaparauskas J, Antuchevičienė J. Importance-performance analysis based balanced scorecard for performance evaluation in higher education institutions: an integrated fuzzy approach. Journal of Business Economics and Management. [Internet] 2020 [cited: 06 December 2024];21(3):647-678. Available in: https://doi.org/10.3846/jbem.2020.11940. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3846/jbem.2020.11940
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Iryna Zhukova , Oksana Strelchenko , Olga Sharahina (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The article is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Unless otherwise stated, associated published material is distributed under the same licence.
