Cultivating humanistic values in aspiring foreign language teachers: the influence of the university setting
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56294/sctconf20251575Keywords:
higher education, philological speciality, axiological system, humanities, didactic model, activity approachAbstract
Introduction: The relevance of this topic since the teaching profession is impossible without a system of values that the teacher will then form among the generation of his/her students.
Objective: The article examines the role of the university environment in forming humanistic values in students, particularly philology students and future foreign language teachers.
Methods: The study is based on the empirical experience of teaching humanities at the Ivan Franko National University of Lviv in the training of future foreign language teachers. The level of humanistic values formation was assessed based on the methodology for diagnosing value orientations (according to Rokeach).
Results: The article describes the main ways of integrating an interdisciplinary approach into the educational process for the formation of humanistic values in the university environment; reveals the role and potential of the university as an educational environment and develops a theoretical model of the process of forming humanistic values of university students; defines the criteria and levels of formation of humanistic values of students, experimentally tests the effectiveness of the model of the process of forming humanistic values of students.
Conclusions: Thus, the authors have proved the effectiveness of the introduced didactic model of gradual and integrated formation of humanistic values. During the formative stage of the experiment, it was possible to modify and organise the system of humanistic values, in particular, the values of freedom (+3.1%), the happiness of others (+3%), tolerance (+2%), and reducing the dominance of material values (-6%).
References
1. Marginson S, Marijk van der Wende. To Rank or to Be Ranked: The Impact of Global Rankings in Higher Education. Journal of Studies in International Education. [Internet] 2007 [cited: 05 December 2024];11:306–329. Available in: https://doi.org/10.1177/1028315307303544 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1028315307303544
2. Marginson S. Dynamics of National and Global Competition in Higher Education. Higher Education. [Internet] 2006 [cited: 05 December 2024];52:1–39. Available in: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-004-7649-x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-004-7649-x
3. Barry A, Born G. Interdisciplinarity: reconfigurations of the social and natural sciences. In Interdisciplinarity. (pp. 1–56). Routledge; 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203584279
4. Corbacho A. M. et al. Interdisciplinary higher education with a focus on academic motivation and teamwork diversity. International Journal of Educational Research Open. [Internet] 2021 [cited: 05 December 2024];2:100062. Available in: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2021.100062 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2021.100062
5. Stokols D., et al. Evaluating transdisciplinary science. Nicotine & Tobacco Research. [Internet] 2023 [cited: 05 December 2024];5:21–39. Available in: https://doi.org/10.1080/14622200310001625555 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14622200310001625555
6. Nicolescu B. Methodology of Transdisciplinarity – Levels of Reality, Logic of the Included Middle and Complexity. Transdisciplinary Journal of Engineering & Science. [Internet] 2010 [cited: 05 December 2024];1(1):19–38. Available in: https://doi.org/10.22545/2010/0009 DOI: https://doi.org/10.22545/2010/0009
7. Birsel Z, Marques L, Loots E. Daring to disentangle: towards a framework for art-science-technology collaborations. Interdisciplinary Science Reviews. [Internet] 2023 [cited: 05 December 2024];48(1):109–128. Available in: https://doi.org/10.1080/03080188.2022.2134539 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03080188.2022.2134539
8. Bakhov I, Rudenko Yu, Dudnik A, Dehtiarova N, Petrenko S. Problems of Teaching Future Teachers of Humanities the Basics of Fuzzy Logic and Ways to Overcome Them. International Journal of Early Childhood Special Education. [Internet] 2021 [cited: 05 December 2024];13(2):844–854. Available in: http://doi.org/10.9756/INT-JECSE/V13I2.211127 DOI: https://doi.org/10.9756/INT-JECSE/V13I2.211127
9. Zhang J, Yang Yu, Ge J, Liang X, An Zh. Stimulating creativity in the classroom: examining the impact of sense of place on students' creativity and the mediating effect of classmate relationships. BMC Psychology. [Internet] 2023 [cited: 05 December 2024];11:432. Available in: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-023-01479-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-023-01479-7
10. Arjanto P, Telussa RP. Educational management strategies: linking infrastructure, student activities, and academic performance. JPPI (Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Indonesia). [Internet] 2024 [cited: 05 December 2024];10(3):163. Available in: http://doi.org/10.29210/020244097 DOI: https://doi.org/10.29210/020244097
11. Gualano RJ, Campbell SW. Classrooms in the metaverse: Educational applications and levels of learner interaction in virtual reality. Communication Education. [Internet] 2024 [cited: 05 December 2024];73(2):212–225. Available in: https://doi.org/10.1080/03634523.2024.2312873 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03634523.2024.2312873
12. Rokeach M. The Nature of Human Values. NY "Free Press"; 1973. 438 p.
13. Quinn J. A humanist university in a posthuman world: relations, responsibilities, and rights. British Journal of Sociology of Education. [Internet] 2021 [cited: 05 December 2024];42(5-6):686–700. Available in: https://doi.org/10.1080/01425692.2021.1922268 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01425692.2021.1922268
14. Kripal J. Humanism and Higher Education. In Anthony B. Pinn (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Humanism. Online edn, Oxford Academic, 4 Oct. 2019; [Internet] 2021 [cited: 05 December 2024]. Available in: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190921538.013.22
15. Braidotti R. Posthuman Humanities. European Educational Research. [Internet] 2013 [cited: 05 December 2024];12(1):1–15. Available in: https://doi.org/10.2304/eerj.2013.12.1.1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2304/eerj.2013.12.1.1
16. Davies B. Ethics and the new materialism. A brief genealogy of the “post” philosophies in the social sciences. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education. [Internet] 2016 [cited: 05 December 2024];39(1):113–127. Available in: https://doi.org/10.1080/01596306.2016.1234682 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01596306.2016.1234682
17. Evans M. Navigating the Neoliberal University: Reflecting on Teaching Practice as a Teacher-Researcher-Trade Unionist. British Journal of Sociology of Education. [Internet] 2020 [cited: 05 December 2024];41(4):574–590. Available in: https://doi.org/10.1080/01425692.2020.1748572 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01425692.2020.1748572
18. Hassan R. The Worldly Space: The Digital University in Network Time. British Journal of Sociology of Education. [Internet] 2017 [cited: 05 December 2024];38:72–82. Available in: https://doi.org/10.1080/01425692.2016.1234364 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01425692.2016.1234364
19. Mateos-González JL, Boliver V. Performance-based university funding and the drive towards 'institutional meritocracy' in Italy. British Journal of Sociology of Education. [Internet] 2018 [cited: 05 December 2024];40(2):145–158. Available in: https://doi.org/10.1080/01425692.2018.1497947 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01425692.2018.1497947
20. Holdsworth C, & Quinn J. The Epistemological Challenge of Higher Education Student Volunteering: "Reproductive" or "Deconstructive" Volunteering?" Antipode. [Internet] 2012 [cited: 05 December 2024];44:386–405. Available in: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8330.2011.00844.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8330.2011.00844.x
21. Snaza N, Weaver J. (Eds.). Posthumanism and Educational Research. 1st ed. Routledge; [Internet] 2014 [cited: 05 December 2024]. Available in: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315769165 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315769165
22. Siddiqui JR. Restyling the humanities curriculum of higher education for posthuman times. Curriculum Inquiry. [Internet] 2016 [cited: 05 December 2024];46(1):62–78. Available in: https://doi.org/10.1080/03626784.2015.1133220 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03626784.2015.1133220
23. Taylor CA, Gannon S. Doing time and motion diffractively: academic life everywhere and all the time. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education. [Internet] 2018 [cited: 05 December 2024];31(6):465–486. Available in: https://doi.org/10.1080/09518398.2017.1422286 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09518398.2017.1422286
24. Farmer R, Farmer S. The Noble Role of Teachers in Values-Based Education. In: Lovat, T., Toomey, R., Clement, N., Dally, K. (Eds.), Second International Research Handbook on Values Education and Student Well-being. Springer International Handbooks of Education. Springer, Cham; [Internet] 2023 [cited: 05 December 2024]. Available in: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-24420-9_31 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-24420-9_31
25. Pedersen D. Integrating social sciences and humanities in interdisciplinary research. Palgrave Communications. [Internet] 2016 [cited: 05 December 2024];2:16036. Available in: https://doi.org/10.1057/palcomms.2016.36 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/palcomms.2016.36
26. Bezliudna et.al. Formation of Humanistic Values of Future Foreign Language Teachers in the Process of Studying Social and Humanitarian Disciplines: Empirical Findings. (2020). Journal of Educational and Social Research, 10(1), 173. https://doi.org/10.36941/jesr-2020-0016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36941/jesr-2020-0016
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Iryna Ladanivska , Olga Zadorozhna , Olena Garmash , Oleksii Bashmanivskyi , Olha Zadoienko (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The article is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Unless otherwise stated, associated published material is distributed under the same licence.
