Digital Governance and Personal Data Protection: Proposals for an Ethical Public Transformation through the Privacy-by-Design Approach

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56294/sctconf20251782

Keywords:

Privacy by Design, Smart Governance, Public Sector Innovation, Open Government Data, Personal Data Protection

Abstract

Introduction: this research examined the relationship between digital innovation in public administration and personal data protection, employing a Privacy-by-Design (PbD) approach. It assessed the extent to which government platforms incorporate ethical and legal aspects that guarantee data privacy and security.
Methods: a qualitative study of Argentine public initiatives was conducted, combining three strategies: (i) visual exploration of the platforms from the user experience; (ii) manual and automated analysis of metadata on published datasets; and (iii) development of a prototype in Python to validate technical aspects linked to PbD principles, such as security settings, transparency, and basic privacy control mechanisms.
Results: progress was observed in access to open public data and tools aimed at citizen transparency. However, the full incorporation of data protection principles remains a challenge, as evidenced by both manual analysis and automated testing of the prototype. Metadata analysis and technical evaluation revealed weaknesses in the design, particularly in privacy and the implementation of user-accessible control mechanisms.
Conclusions: the results underscore the importance of integrating Privacy-by-Design into smart governance, thereby strengthening citizen trust in digital services and promoting more responsible and sustainable forms of governance. Design recommendations are presented that foster a paradigm shift in application development and regulatory standards for digital public innovation.

 

References

1. Valdiviezo GT, Alegre LR, Ayala DM, Padilla RD. Digital transformation in Latin America: a systematic review. Rev Venez Gerenc. 2022;27(100):1519–36. DOI: https://doi.org/10.52080/rvgluz.27.100.15

2. Aucancela AM. The era of big data and open data in public administration. Rev Eurolatinoam Derecho Adm. 2021;8(1):61–76. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14409/redoeda.v8i1.9520

3. De Los Ríos Rueda MA, Galvis-Tovar JE. Colombia: Integration of Health Data Protection Regulations and the Case for International Health Data Transfers. In: International Transfers of Health Data: A Global Perspective. Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore; 2025. p. 239–59. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-9983-1_12

4. Argentina.gob.ar. Datos abiertos [Internet]. [cited 2025 Jul 6]. Available from: https://www.argentina.gob.ar/datos-abiertos

5. Buenos Aires Data. BA Data [Internet]. [cited 2025 Jul 6]. Available from: https://data.buenosaires.gob.ar/

6. Hossain MA, Dwivedi YK, Rana NP. State-of-the-art in open data research: Insights from existing literature and a research agenda. J Organ Comput Electron Commer. 2016;26(1–2):14–40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10919392.2015.1124007

7. Hondares YP, Almora RM, Véliz AP. La protección de datos personales. Rev Científica Ecociencia. 2021;8:126–61. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21855/ecociencia.80.644

8. León-Arroba RC, López-Sevilla GM. A Security-by-Design Architecture Proposal for the Protection of Personal Data in Public Entities. MQRInvestigar. 2024;8(4):4192–218. DOI: https://doi.org/10.56048/MQR20225.8.4.2024.4192-4218

9. Meyers G, Van Oirsouw CC, Keymolen EL, Goossens J. After the announcement: an interdisciplinary analysis of blockchain development in governments. Policy Des Pract. 2023;6(4):505–19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/25741292.2023.2272332

10. Wang X. The Problems and Optimization Paths of Digital Government Governance in Shandong Province. In: Proc 2nd Int Conf Digit Econ Manag Sci (CDEMS). Atlantis Press; 2024. p. 504–10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2991/978-94-6463-488-4_57

11. Shafik W. Shaping the Next Generation Smart City Ecosystem. In: Smart Cities: Innovations, Challenges and Future Perspectives. Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland; 2024. p. 3–52. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-59846-3_1

12. Andrade VC, Gomes RD, Reinehr S, Freitas CO, Malucelli A. Privacy by design and software engineering: a systematic literature review. In: Proc XXI Braz Symp Softw Qual. 2022. p. 1–10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3571473.3571480

13. Cavoukian A. Privacy by design: The seven foundational principles. IAPP Resour Cent. 2021.

14. Porcelli AM. La protección de los datos personales en el entorno digital. Quaestio Iuris. 2019;12(2). DOI: https://doi.org/10.12957/rqi.2019.40175

15. European Union. Regulation (EU) 2016/679 (General Data Protection Regulation – GDPR).

16. Yanamala AK, Suryadevara S. Navigating data protection challenges in the era of AI: A comprehensive review. Rev Int Artif Med. 2024;15(1):113–46.

17. Matheus R, Janssen M, Janowski T. Design principles for creating digital transparency in government. Gov Inf Q. 2021;38(1):101550. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2020.101550

18. Del-Real C, De Busser E, van den Berg B. A systematic literature review of security and privacy by design. Int Rev Law Comput Technol. 2025:1–32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13600869.2025.2457227

19. Jowarder RA, Jahan S. Quantum computing in cyber security. World J Adv Eng Technol Sci. 2024;13(1):330–9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30574/wjaets.2024.13.1.0421

20. Quach S, Thaichon P, Martin KD, Weaven S, Palmatier RW. Digital technologies: tensions in privacy and data. J Acad Mark Sci. 2022;50(6):1299–323. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-022-00845-y

21. Eom SJ, Lee J. Digital government transformation in turbulent times. Gov Inf Q. 2022;39(2):101690. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2022.101690

22. George G, Merrill RK, Schillebeeckx SJ. Digital sustainability and entrepreneurship. Entrep Theory Pract. 2021;45(5):999–1027. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1042258719899425

23. Feng S, Zhang R, Li G. Environmental decentralization, digital finance and green technology innovation. Struct Change Econ Dyn. 2022;61:70–83. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strueco.2022.02.008

24. Castro C, Lopes C. Digital government and sustainable development. J Knowl Econ. 2022;13(2):880–903. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-021-00749-2

25. Yee CK, Zolkipli MF. Review on confidentiality, integrity and availability in information security. J ICT Educ. 2021;8(2):34–42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37134/jictie.vol8.2.4.2021

26. Kim L. Cybersecurity. In: Nursing Informatics. Cham: Springer; 2022. p. 391–410. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-91237-6_26

27. Jha RK. Cybersecurity and confidentiality in smart grid. Recent Res Rev J. 2023;2(2):215–41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36548/rrrj.2023.2.001

28. Nouwens M, Liccardi I, Veale M, Karger D, Kagal L. Dark patterns after the GDPR. In: Proc CHI Conf Hum Factors Comput Syst. 2020. p. 1–13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376321

29. Borberg I, Hougaard R, Rafnsson W, Kulyk O. So I sold my soul: Effects of dark patterns. In: USEC Symp. 2022.

30. Georgiadis G, Poels G. Towards a privacy impact assessment methodology. Comput Law Secur Rev. 2022;44:105640. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2021.105640

31. Aljeraisy A, Barati M, Rana O, Perera C. Exploring relationships between privacy by design and privacy laws. arXiv [Preprint]. 2022 Oct 6. Available from: https://arxiv.org/abs/2210.03520

32. Zaeem RN, Barber KS. Economics of Privacy: Privacy, a Machine Learning Perspective. In: Encyclopedia of Cryptography, Security and Privacy. Cham: Springer; 2025. p. 745–7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-71522-9_1612

33. Mohan N, KA Z. Assessing the impact of privacy policy motivations. Int J Hum Comput Interact. 2025;1–4.

34. Reeck C, Guo X, Dimoka A, Pavlou PA. Uncovering the neural processes of privacy. Inf Syst Res. 2024;35(2):727–46. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2021.0550

35. Adam S, Makhortykh M, Maier M, et al. Improving quality of web tracking: challenges and new solutions. Soc Sci Comput Rev. 2024 Oct 16.

36. Choi JR, Kim S. Predicting privacy protection and self-tracking behaviors in smart health. Telemat Inform. 2024;86:102069. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2023.102069

37. Andraško J, Mesarčík M. Data protection in EU electronic identification. TalTech J Eur Stud. 2021;11(2). DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/bjes-2021-0012

38. Politou E, Alepis E, Virvou M, Patsakis C. Privacy and data protection challenges in the distributed era. Cham: Springer; 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-85443-0

39. Alic D. Data protection and cybersecurity regulations in AI governance. CEU Thesis Repos. 2021 Jun.

Downloads

Published

2025-07-09

How to Cite

1.
Martínez R. Digital Governance and Personal Data Protection: Proposals for an Ethical Public Transformation through the Privacy-by-Design Approach. Salud, Ciencia y Tecnología - Serie de Conferencias [Internet]. 2025 Jul. 9 [cited 2025 Aug. 15];4:1782. Available from: https://conferencias.ageditor.ar/index.php/sctconf/article/view/1782