Competitiveness in the classification of port systems
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56294/sctconf2022255Keywords:
Classification of Port Systems, Port Competitiveness, Automation, Digitization, TechnologyAbstract
The overall objective of the research was to classify port systems for competitiveness by implementation criteria, continents and indicators of port functional competitiveness. It used a qualitative approach and was applied. The research design was thematic narrative due to the variety of information used in reference documents based on the theme of classification of port systems for competitiveness. A classification with 18 criteria was designed by assessing their fulfilment in the different port systems based on the literature reviewed. They were also classified by level of implementation, by countries in which they have been implemented and by port competitiveness indicators. The port community and the automatic identification system are focused on improving the flow of information, while the terminal operation system, the automated gate system and the truck appointment system are focused on optimising the operations carried out in the ports, four levels were detailed, from the first level, where there is only an individual digital transformation and where the systems improve internal processes, to the last level where absolutely everything is integrated and there is a complete replacement of paper-based processes by electronic processes through systems and technologies.
References
1. Agatić, A. & Kolanović, I. (2020). Improving the seaport service quality by implementing digital technologies. Pomorstvo, 34(1), 93-101. https://doi.org/10.31217/p.34.1.11 DOI: https://doi.org/10.31217/p.34.1.11
2. Andreani, J. C. (2021a). Neurotomía Periférica Selectiva del Nervio mediano a nivel del brazo. Indicaciones y técnica quirúrgica. NeuroTarget, 15(3), Article 3. https://doi.org/10.47924/neurotarget20214 DOI: https://doi.org/10.47924/neurotarget20214
3. Andreani, J. C. (2021b). Relevancia anátomo–funcional del núcleo amigdalino. Su fisiología, fisiopatología y orientaciones terapéuticas. NeuroTarget, 15(3), Article 3. https://doi.org/10.47924/neurotarget20213 DOI: https://doi.org/10.47924/neurotarget20213
4. Asborno, M., Hernandez, S., & Yves, M. (2021). GIS-based identification and visualization of multimodal freight transportation catchment areas. Transportation. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-020-10155-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-020-10155-3
5. Auliaamafaza, A. I., Wahyuni, I. S., Erlangga, E. A., & Amirudin, A. (2022). Ethnography of Thruthuk as Identity of Cultural Arts in Semarang City – Indonesia. Espergesia, 9(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.18050/rev.espergesia.v9i2.2058 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18050/rev.espergesia.v9i2.2058
6. Autoridad Portuaria Nacional [National Port Authority]. (2019). Actualización del Plan Nacional de Desarrollo Portuario [Update of the National Port Development Plan]. https://cdn.www.gob.pe/uploads/document/file/471643/Plan_Nacional_de_Desarrollo_Portuario_Nacional__PNDP_.pdf
7. Barrios, V., Cesan, M., Cieplicki, N., & Rosales, M. G. (2021). Una revisión sobre la eficacia del tratamiento cognitivo conductual para el abordaje de la comorbilidad de dolor crónico y el consumo problemático de sustancias. NeuroTarget, 15(3), Article 3. https://doi.org/10.47924/neurotarget20217 DOI: https://doi.org/10.47924/neurotarget20217
8. Bisogno, M., Nota, G., Saccomanno, A., & Tommasetti, A. (2015). Improving the efficiency of Port Community Systems through integrated information flows of logistic processes. International Journal of Digital Accounting Research, 15, 1-31. https://doi.org/10.4192/1577-8517-v15_1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4192/1577-8517-v15_1
9. Brachuk, A. (2018). The International Standards of Single Window System for the Foreign Trade. Lex Portus, 1, 93-104. https://doi.org/10.26886/2524-101X.1.2018.7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.26886/2524-101X.1.2018.7
10. Caldeirinha, V., Felício, J., Salvador, A., Nabais, J., & Pinho, T. (2020). Sistema comunitário portuário (SCP) e desempenho do porto [Port Community System (PCS) and port performance]. Revista Eletrônica de Estratégia & Negócios, 13(1), 159-195. https://doi.org/10.19177/reen.v13e0I2020159-195 DOI: https://doi.org/10.19177/reen.v13e0I2020159-195
11. Carlan, V., Sys, C. & Vanelslander, T. (2016). How port community systems can contribute to port competitiveness: Developing a cost–benefit framework. Research in Transportation Business & Management, 19, 51-64. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rtbm.2016.03.009 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rtbm.2016.03.009
12. Carpio, J. A. C. D. (2022). Actitudes sociales de limeños ante el confinamiento por la pandemia de COVID-19 en 2020. UCV Hacer, 11(3), Article 3. https://doi.org/10.18050/RevUCVHACER.v11n3a3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18050/RevUCVHACER.v11n3a3
13. Chavez, E. del M. P. (2022). Técnicas gráfico-plásticas en la primera infancia para estimular la coordinación óculo manual: Una alternativa pedagógica. UCV Hacer, 11(3), Article 3. https://doi.org/10.18050/RevUCVHACER.v11n3a5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18050/RevUCVHACER.v11n3a5
14. Chero, J. C. B., & Ugaz, W. A. C. (2022). Valoración Económica de los servicios Ecosistémicos Área de Conservación Regional Moyán Palacio, región Lambayeque. UCV Hacer, 11(3), Article 3. https://doi.org/10.18050/RevUCVHACER.v11n3a4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18050/RevUCVHACER.v11n3a4
15. Collori, M. A. G., Vera, O. J. S., Periche, J. T. R., Gonzáles, J. del R. G., & Garcia, A. C. V. (2022). Sistema de osmosis inversa en remoción de arsénico de agua subterránea en Pacora. UCV Hacer, 11(4), Article 4. https://revistas.ucv.edu.pe/index.php/ucv-hacer/article/view/2331 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18050/RevUCVHACER.v11n4a1
16. Constante, J., Lucenti, K., & Deambrosi, S. (2019). International case studies and good practices for implementing Port Community Systems. Inter-American Development Bank. https://publications.iadb.org/en/international-case-studies-and-good-practices-implementing-port-community-systems
17. Derito, M. N. C. (2021). Homenaje al DR. Juan Carlos Goldar, Gran Neuropsiquiatra Argentino. NeuroTarget, 15(3), Article 3. https://doi.org/10.47924/neurotarget20212 DOI: https://doi.org/10.47924/neurotarget20212
18. Durán, C., Palominos, F., & Córdova, F. (2017). Applying multi-criteria analysis in a port system. Procedia Computer Science, 122, 478-485. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2017.11.396 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2017.11.396
19. Dursun, E. & Güngör, Ş. (2020). Değişim yönetimi yöntemlerinin karşilaştirilmasi: konteyner terminal işletim sistemi (TOS) üzerine bir uygulama [Comparison of change management methods: an application in the thermal container operating system (TOS)]. Journal of International Management Educational and Economics Perspectives, 8(1), 82-95. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/jimeep/issue/55110/754811
20. Fournier, M., Hilliard, R., Rezaee, S., & Pelot, R. (2018). Past, present, and future of the satellite-based automatic identification system: areas of applications (2004–2016). WMU Journal of Maritime Affairs, 17(3), 311-345. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13437-018-0151-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13437-018-0151-6
21. Fri, M., Douaioui, K., Mabrouki, C. & Semma, E. (2020). Efficiency Analysis of Performance in Container Terminals, Case Study of Moroccan Ports. CPI 2019: Advances in Integrated Design and Production, 365-371. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-62199-5_32 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-62199-5_32
22. Fundación Valenciaport [Valenciaport Foundation]. (2020). Smart Ports Manual: Strategy and Roadmap. https://publications.iadb.org/en/smart-ports-manual-strategy-and-roadmap
23. Garcés-Ginarte, M. J., Pérez-Ortiz, L., & Vitón-Castillo, A. A. (2023). Scientific production on crania-encephalic trauma in Cuban student journals. January 2015-June 2021. Revista Medica Electronica, 45(1). Scopus.
24. Gardeitchik, J. & Buck, W. (2019). Move Rorward: Go next level with your Port Community System. Port Fordward Digital solutions by Port of Rotterdam. https://www.apn.gob.pe/site/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/pdf/DQSU5BEET0TOM6DPYVBRL32O81NAHFXQJUW9.pdf
25. Gekara, V. & Nguyen, X. (2020). Challenges of Implementing Container Terminal Operating System: The Case of the Port of Mombasa from the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) Perspective. Journal of International Logistics and Trade, 18(1), 49-60. http://dx.doi.org/10.24006/JILT.2020.18.1.049 DOI: https://doi.org/10.24006/jilt.2020.18.1.049
26. Hales, D., Chang, Y., Lee, J., Desplebin, O, Dholakia, N., & Al-Wugayan, A. (2017). An empirical test of the balanced theory of port competitiveness. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 28(2), 363-378. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/IJLM-06-2015-0101 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLM-06-2015-0101
27. Heilig, L. & Voß, S. (2017). Information systems in seaports: a categorization and overview. Information Technology and Management, 18(3), 179-201. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10799-016-0269-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10799-016-0269-1
28. Heilig, L., Schwarze, S., & Voß, S. (2017). An Analysis of Digital Transformation in the History and Future of Modern Ports. Proceedings of the 50th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (2017). Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. https://dx.doi.org/10.24251/hicss.2017.160 DOI: https://doi.org/10.24251/HICSS.2017.160
29. Heilig, L., Stahlbock, R., & Voß, S. (2019). From Digitalization to Data-Driven Decision Making in Container Terminals. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-39990-0_6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-39990-0_6
30. Hernández, R., Fernández, C., & Baptista, P. (2014). Metodología de la investigación [Research methodology] (6ª ed.). México D. F.: McGraw Hill.
31. Hervás-Peralta, M., Poveda-Reyes, S., Molero, G., Santarremigia, F., & Pastor-Ferrando, J. (2019). Improving the performance of dry and maritime ports by increasing knowledge about the most relevant functionalities of the terminal operating system (TOS). Sustainability (Switzerland), 11(6), 1648. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su11061648 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su11061648
32. Indriastiwi, F. & Hadiwardoyo, S. (2021). Port Connectivity Model in The Perspective of Multimodal Transport: A Conceptual Framework. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 1052(1), 012008. https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/1052/1/012008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/1052/1/012008
33. Institute for Management Development. (2020). IMD WORLD COMPETITIVENESS RANKING 2020. https://www.imd.org/centers/world-competitiveness-center/rankings/world-competitiveness/
34. Instituto mexicano del transporte [Mexican Institute of Transportation]. (2016). Sistema de indicadores portuarios: Metodología [Port Indicator System: Methodology]. https://portalcip.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/Metodologia-Sistema-de-Indicadores-Portuarios-Dic2016VF.pdf
35. International Port Community Systems Association. (2015). How to develop a Port Community System. https://www.ipcsa.international/armoury/resources/ipcsa-guide-english-2015.pdf
36. Ivanova, S. & Latyshov, A. (2018). New Globalization as an Exogenous Factor in the Formation of the Foreign Trade Policy of the Republic of Korea. Vestnik of the Plekhanov Russian University of Economics, (6), 214–223. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.21686/2413-2829-2018-6-214-223 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21686/2413-2829-2018-6-214-223
37. Joshi, M. (2017). Prospects and Problems of Single Window System implementation in India. https://ijemr.in/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/Prospects-and-Problems-of-Single-Window-System-implementation-in-India.pdf
38. Jovanovic, R. (2018). Optimizing Truck Visits to Container Terminals with Consideration of Multiple Drays of Individual Drivers. Journal of Optimization. https://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/5165124 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/5165124
39. Kartyshev, D. (2018). Implementation of Ukraine’s world experience institutional support for carriage transportation. Economic Innovations, 20(1(66)), 87–95. https://dx.doi.org/10.31520/ei.2018.20.1(66).87-95 DOI: https://doi.org/10.31520/ei.2018.20.1(66).87-95
40. Khalid, A. & Al-Mamery, M. (2019). Competitiveness of Arabian Gulf Ports from Shipping Lines’ Perspectives: Case of Sohar Port in Oman. Journal of Industrial Engineering & Management, 12(3), 458–471. https://doi.org/10.3926/jiem.2982 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3926/jiem.2982
41. Koroleva, E., Sokolov, S., Makashina, I., & Filatova, E. (2019). Information technologies as a way of port activity optimization in conditions of digital economy. E3S Web of Conferences, 138, 02002. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/201913802002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/201913802002
42. Kotowska, I., Mańkowska, M., & Pluciński, M. (2018). Inland shipping to serve the hinterland: The challenge for seaport authorities. Sustainability (Switzerland), 10(10), 3468. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su10103468 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su10103468
43. Kubowicz, D. (2019). Management of cargo flow processes at a maritime terminal container with the use of information systems of the TOS type. AUTOBUSY–Technika, Eksploatacja, Systemy Transportowe, 20(1-2), 487-492. https://dx.doi.org/10.24136/atest.2019.092 DOI: https://doi.org/10.24136/atest.2019.092
44. Lange, A., Kühl, K., Schwientek, A., & Jahn, C. (2018). Influence of drayage patterns on truck appointment systems. Logistics 4.0 and Sustainable Supply Chain Management: Innovative Solutions for Logistics and Sustainable Supply Chain Management in the Context of Industry 4.0, 26, 41-59. https://tubdokservice.tub.tuhh.de/bitstream/11420/1821/1/Lange_K%C3%BChl_Schwientek_Jahn-Influende_of_Drayage_Patterns_hicl_2018.pdf
45. Lange, A., Kühl, K., Schwientek, A., y Jahn, C. (2018). Influence of drayage patterns on truck appointment systems. Logistics 4.0 and Sustainable 88 Supply Chain Management: Innovative Solutions for Logistics and Sustainable Supply Chain Management in the Context of Industry 4.0, 26, 41-59. https://dx.doi.org/10.15480/882.1818
46. Long, A. (2009). Port community systems. World Customs Journal, 3(1), 63–67. https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/1c43c500-9c96-358a-a984-82d2d9c599ea/
47. Marek, R. (2018). Rozwój Krajowego Port Community System. Research Papers of the Wroclaw University of Economics / Prace Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego We Wroclawiu, 505, 371–382. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bth&AN=131076988&lang=es&site=ehost-live DOI: https://doi.org/10.15611/pn.2018.505.28
48. Mendoza, G. R. G., Reyes, V. M., Morales, A. G. S., Casana, P. F. D., & Bustillos, J. K. L. (2022). Factores condicionantes y efectividad del servicio público de agua potable en el Cantón Santa Lucía, Guayas-Ecuador. UCV Hacer, 11(3), Article 3. https://doi.org/10.18050/RevUCVHACER.v11n3a2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18050/RevUCVHACER.v11n3a2
49. Min, H., Ahn, S., Lee, H., & Park, H. (2017). An integrated terminal operating system for enhancing the efficiency of seaport terminal operators. Maritime Economics & Logistics, 19(3), 428-450. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41278-017-0069-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41278-017-0069-5
50. Muñoz, A. (2012). Tipos de investigación [Types of research]. Academia Edu, 6-10. https://www.academia.edu/33795555/TIPOS_DE_INVESTIGACION_Y_DISE%C3%91O_DE_INVESTIGACION
51. My-Hanh, M., Thien-Vu, G., Thanh-Huan, N., Van-Son, H., & Vinh-Khuong, N. (2022). The trauma of Vietnamese children living in the incomplete families. Espergesia, 9(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.18050/rev.espergesia.v9i1.2062 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18050/rev.espergesia.v9i1.2062
52. Nasution, A. & Arviansyah. (2019). Container terminal landside operation analysis and discrete event simulation in container terminal in port: A case study of Terminal 3 Ocean-going PT Pelabuhan Tanjung Priok. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 567 (1), 012033. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/567/1/012033 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/567/1/012033
53. Neagoe, M., Nguyen, H., Taskhiri, M., & Turner, P. (2017). Port terminal congestion management. An integrated information systems approach for improving supply chain value. In Proceedings from the Australasian Conference on Information Systems, 1-9. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85088912808&partnerID=40&md5=80faba8c85627323776ef35ece87a74e
54. NeagoeNota, G., Bisogno, M., & Saccomanno, A. (2018). A service-oriented approach to modeling and performance analysis of Port Community Systems. International Journal of Engineering Business Management, 10, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1177/1847979018767766 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1847979018767766
55. Netherlands Enterprise Agency. (2020). Study digitalization in ports in the Latin American region (Publication RVO-177-2020/RP-INT). Department of the Ministry of Economic Affairs and Climate Policy of the Netherlands. https://www.rvo.nl/sites/default/files/2020/12/Digitization_in_ports_in_the_Latin_American_Region%202020.pdf
56. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. (2014). The Competitiveness of Global Port-Cities. OECD Publishing. https://www.oecd.org/regional/the-competitiveness-of-global-port-cities-9789264205277-en.htm
57. Palacios, N. & González, F. (2018). Estudio de un Sistema Informático que realice Intercambios Electrónicos de Datos para compartir Información controlada entre Entidades del Sector Marítimo Panameño [Study of a Computer System that performs Electronic Data Interchange to share controlled Information between Entities of the Panamanian Maritime Sector]. KnE Engineering, 438-448. https://dx.doi.org/10.18502/keg.v3i1.1448 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18502/keg.v3i1.1448
58. Parola, F., Risitano, M., Ferretti, M., & Panetti E. (2017). The drivers of port competitiveness: A critical review. Transport Reviews, 37(1), 116-138. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2016.1231232 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2016.1231232
59. Peng, P., Yang, Y., Lu, F., Cheng, S., Mou, N., & Yang, R. (2018). Modelling the competitiveness of the ports along the Maritime Silk Road with big data. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 118, 852-867. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2018.10.041 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2018.10.041
60. Piedimonte, L. (2021). Relato de la V Jornada de Psicopatología y Neurociencias. NeuroTarget, 15(3), Article 3. https://doi.org/10.47924/neurotarget20218 DOI: https://doi.org/10.47924/neurotarget20218
61. Ramadhan, F. & Wasesa, M. (2020). Agent-based Truck Appointment System for Containers Pick-up Time Negotiation. IJCCS (Indonesian Journal of Computing and Cybernetics Systems), 14(1), 81. https://dx.doi.org/10.22146/ijccs.51274 DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/ijccs.51274
62. Ramos, R. P. B., & Manalo, J. J. P. (2022). The ASEAN Way: Challenges, Issues, and Opportunities during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Espergesia, 9(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.18050/rev.espergesia.v9i1.2061 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18050/rev.espergesia.v9i1.2061
63. Rodríguez, J. C. M., & Jiménez, D. V. (2022). Determinants of didactics in the virtual educational communication of Higher Education, COVID-19 context. Espergesia, 9(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.18050/rev.espergesia.v9i1.2074 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18050/rev.espergesia.v9i1.2074
64. Šakan, D., Rudan, I., Žuškin, S., & Brčić, D. (2018). Near real-time S-AIS: Recent developments and implementation possibilities for global maritime stakeholders. Pomorstvo, 32 (2), 211-218. https://doi.org/10.31217/p.32.2.6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.31217/p.32.2.6
65. Salgado, A. (2007). Quality investigation: designs, evaluation of the methodological strictness and challenges. Liberabit, 13(13), 71-78. http://www.scielo.org.pe/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1729-48272007000100009&lng=es&tlng=en.
66. Shamsuddin, W. N. F. W., Anuardi, M. N. A. M., & Rozee, I. S. M. (2022). A preliminary study on the potential of Virtual Reality Therapy in reducing public speaking anxiety. Espergesia, 9(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.18050/rev.espergesia.v9i1.2087 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18050/rev.espergesia.v9i1.2087
67. Sholihah, S., Bahagia, S., Cakravastia, A., & Samadhi, T. (2017). Benchmarking Inter-Organizational System Architecture of Trade Facilitation in Singapore, Hong Kong, Netherlands, and USA. International Journal of Trade, Economics and Finance, 8(6), 263–269. https://dx.doi.org/10.18178/ijtef.2017.8.6.576 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18178/ijtef.2017.8.6.576
68. Shook, P. (2017). The intermodal sector is on the Fast Track for Growth: The future is bright for shippers making the shift from road to rail or increasing intermodal shipping. Material Handling & Logistics, 72(7), 27–28. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=iih&AN=125498778&lang=es&site=ehost-live
69. Tang, S., Zhang, J., & Du, L. (2020). Research on Competitiveness Evaluation of Major Inland Ports in China. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 526(1), 012174. https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/526/1/012174 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/526/1/012174
70. Tapaninen, U. & Posti, A. (2011). Port community systems – the Finnish case Securing effective information exchange. Baltic transport Journal, 24-25. https://www.merikotka.fi/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/MOPO_Baltic_Transport_Journal_2_2011.pdf
71. Tijan, E., Agatić, A., & Hlača, B. (2012). The Necessity of Port Community System Implementation in the Croatian Seaports. PROMET - Traffic&Transportation, 24(4), 305–315. https://dx.doi.org/10.7307/ptt.v24i4.444. https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/9b4ba553-0f35-3e45-999a-d4c55d4e2397/
72. Tijan, E., Jardas, M., Aksentijević, S., & Hadžić, A. (2018). Integrating maritime national single window with port community system – Case study Croatia. 31st Bled eConference: Digital Transformation: Meeting the Challenges, BLED, 1-12. http://dx.doi.org/10.18690/978-961-286-170-4.1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18690/978-961-286-170-4.1
73. Tijan, E., Jovic, M., & Karanikic, P. (2019). Economic and ecological aspects of electronic Transportation Management Systems in seaports. Proceedings of the Maritime and Port Logistics Bar Conference, 132. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/339004465_Economic_and_ecological_aspects_of_electronic_Transportation_Management_Systems_in_seaports
74. Torbianelli, V. (2016). “Valore focale della legge” e “economia dell’identità” quali strumenti teorici per l’interpretazione del debole sviluppo dell’interoperabilità fra “Port Community Systems” (PCS) e “portali unici nazionali” nel contesto portuale italiano [Focal value of the law" and "economy of identity" as theoretical tools for interpreting the weak development of interoperability between "Port Community Systems" (PCS) and "single national portals" in the Italian port context]. Rivista di Economia e Politica dei Trasporti [Journal of Economics and Transport Policy]. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edsbas&AN=edsbas.EF418932&lang=es&site=eds-live
75. Torlak, I., Tijan, E., Aksentijević, S., & Oblak, R. (2020). Analysis of Port Community System Introduction in Croatian Seaports-Case Study Split. Transactions on Maritime Science, 9(2), 331-341. http://dx.doi.org/10.7225/toms.v09.n02.015 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7225/toms.v09.n02.015
76. Varbanova, A. (2017). Status and perspectives of port community systems development in the European union: the case of Bulgarian black seaports. Trans Motauto World, 2(4), 158-161. https://stumejournals.com/journals/tm/2017/4/158.full.pdf
77. Vitón-Castillo, A. A., & Lazo Herrera, L. A. (2021). ICT in Cuban medical education in times of COVID-19. Educacion Medica, 22, S27. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edumed.2020.07.013 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edumed.2020.07.013
78. World Economic Forum. (2019). The Global Competitiveness Report 2019. http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_TheGlobalCompetitivenessReport2019.pdf
79. Yaacob, A. & Koto, J. (2018). The Usage of Automatic Identification System (AIS) Data for Safety during Navigation. International Journal of Supply Chain Management; 7, 5: International Journal of Supply Chain Management (IJSCM), 233-244. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edsbas&AN=edsbas.4B8AFD13&lang=es&site=eds-live
80. Zanne, M., Twrdy, E., & Beškovnik, B. (2021). The Effect of Port Gate Location and Gate Procedures on the Port-City Relation. Sustainability, 13, 4884. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13094884 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su13094884
81. Zhou, Y., Daamen, W., Vellinga, T., & Hoogendoorn, S. (2020). Impacts of wind and current on ship behavior in ports and waterways: A quantitative analysis based on AIS data. Ocean Engineering, 213, 107774. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2020.107774 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2020.107774
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Fabiola Cruz Navarro Soto, Yadit Rocca Carvajal, Doris Rosario Yaya Castañeda, Alberto Miguel Vizcarra Quiñones, Roque Juan Espinoza Casco, Percy Junior Castro Mejía (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The article is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Unless otherwise stated, associated published material is distributed under the same licence.
