CRITIC method: legal, psychological, and social analysis of the process of power detention
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56294/sctconf2025621Keywords:
Law, Institutions, Transparency, Participation, Distrust, CohesionAbstract
The study focused on the legal, psychological, and social analysis of the power detention process. The research aimed to identify the most relevant factors and their interrelations in the consolidation of this phenomenon, considering institutional dynamics, psychological perceptions, and social implications. The method of Criteria Importance through Correlation was used, employing a thorough theoretical review and case analysis of relevant examples that demonstrated different scenarios of power detention in diverse political and social contexts. The results highlighted that institutional weakness, normative gaps, and social crises favor the detention of power, while its psychological and social effects include distrust towards institutions, citizen discontent, and the erosion of social cohesion. Additionally, common patterns were identified in the analyzed processes, such as the strategic use of legitimizing discourses and the instrumentalization of state resources. It was concluded that strengthening democratic structures, promoting a culture of transparency, and designing policies that foster citizen participation is essential to mitigate these impacts and prevent their recurrence. This work offered a novel approach by applying a quantitative method to evaluate a complex phenomenon from an interdisciplinary perspective, combining mathematical tools with the analysis of qualitative and contextual variables.
References
1. Zinni M. Contra Morcillo: Peralta Barnuevo y la defensa del virrey. Mem Am [Internet]. 2021;29(2):171–85. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.34096/mace.v29i2.9979 DOI: https://doi.org/10.34096/mace.v29i2.9979
2. Llahí S. La eterna vigencia de Shakespeare, en La Pampa también. Teatro XXI [Internet]. 2024;(40). Available from: http://revistascientificas2.filo.uba.ar/index.php/teatroxxi/article/view/14879
3. Lesgart C. Autoritarismo. Historia y problemas de un concepto contemporáneo fundamental. Perf Latinoam [Internet]. 2020;28(55). Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.18504/pl2855-014-2020 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18504/pl2855-014-2020
4. Maldonado Valera, C., Marinho, M. L., Robles, C., & Tromben, V. 2022). Cohesión social y desarrollo social inclusivo en América Latina. Una propuesta para una era de incertidumbres. CEPAL [Internet]. Naciones Unidas. 2022. Available from: https://repositorio.cepal.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/22807d55-48c6-4e4a-a4c1-4e4fb27374d4/content
5. González JH, Barba IO. La patología del poder en el político mexicano. Un acercamiento transdisciplinario de una enfermedad mental. Acta Republicana [Internet]. 2024;(1):23–36. Available from: https://actarepublicana.cucsh.udg.mx/index.php/AR/article/view/215
6. Mangat G, Sharma S. MSR36 how does the use of different targeted literature review (TLR) methodologies impact the research output? A case study of structured vs. Focused vs. Pearl growing approach. Value Health [Internet]. 2023;26(6):S284. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2023.03.1572 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2023.03.1572
7. Bilişik ÖN, Duman NH, Taş E. A novel interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy CRITIC-TOPSIS methodology: An application for transportation mode selection problem for a glass production company. Expert Syst Appl [Internet]. 2024;235(121134):121134. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2023.121134 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2023.121134
8. Faizi N, Alvi Y. Data management and SPSS environment. In: Biostatistics Manual for Health Research. Elsevier. [Internet] 2023. p. 17–43. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-443-18550-2.00008-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-443-18550-2.00008-6
9. ASAMBLEA NACIONAL, R. D. E. (2021). CÓDIGO ORGÁNICO INTEGRAL PENAL, COIP. Ley 0. Registro Oficial Suplemento 180 [Internet]. 2021. Available from: https://www.gob.ec/regulaciones/180-codigo-organico-integral-penal
10. Méndez AR. Tiempo de preguntas. Retos de la democracia latinamericana en la década en curso. LOGOS Rev Filos [Internet]. 2022;50(139). Available from: https://repositorio.lasalle.mx/handle/lasalle/2374 DOI: https://doi.org/10.26457/lrf.v139i139.3345
11. Colalongo RE, Rayran-Cortés MA. La metamorfosis de la política exterior de Recep Tayyip Erdoğan: de un populismo internacional a uno transnacional-limitado. Foro Int [Internet]. 2023;413–48. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.24201/fi.v63i3.2990 DOI: https://doi.org/10.24201/fi.v63i3.2990
12. Villagómez Samaniego EP, Trujillo Polo EM, Ávila Rosalino MP, Landázuri Usiña JP. Crisis de Gobernabilidad en el Ecuador en el Siglo XXI y sus Impactos en la Balanza Comercial. Ciencia Latina [Internet]. 2024;8(1):8146–60. Available from: https://ciencialatina.org/index.php/cienciala/article/view/10133 DOI: https://doi.org/10.37811/cl_rcm.v8i1.10133
13. Nash Rojas C. Nuevos desarrollos sobre corrupción como violación de Derechos Humanos. El Informe “Derechos Humanos y Corrupción” de la Comisión Interamericana de Derechos Humanos. Cuest Const Rev Mex Derecho Const [Internet]. 2021;(45):205–35. Available from: https://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?pid=S1405-91932021000200205&script=sci_arttext DOI: https://doi.org/10.22201/iij.24484881e.2021.45.16662
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Sherly Nicole Laica De Faz, Stefania Raimondi Romero, Fernando de Jesús Castro Sánchez (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The article is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Unless otherwise stated, associated published material is distributed under the same licence.
