Gamification and Computational Thinking in Education: A systematic literature review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56294/sctconf2024659Keywords:
Computational Thinking, Gamification, (Primary And Secondary) EducationAbstract
The rapid development of gamification and computational thinking seems to open up new educational horizons by providing new opportunities for students to acquire the basic digital skills needed for their cognitive development. Gamification, on the side, flourishes because it brings about high degree of participants’ engagement in an activity. Accordingly, on the other side, the growing scientific interest in computational thinking centers on the fact that it provides a fruitful field of dialogue in the research community for the development of critical and analytical thinking of students. Hence, this paper aims to synthesize knowledge about gamification and computational thinking for improving education for the benefit of students. Specifically, this paper describes: (a) the theoretical background of gamification in learning and education, (b) relevant studies in literature and their findings, and (c) specific gamified applications of STEM [Science, Technology, Engineering, Mathematics] which have been developed to this subject area. Four databases were searched, and 37 papers were finally selected for this review. The findings from the presented learning theories set the foundation on how students obtain knowledge, and the relevant studies in the field of gamification and computational thinking showed some first positive outcomes stemming some first research attempts which need further examination. Furthermore, it seems that with the right use of game mechanics and elements, well-designed applications of STEM gain students’ interest to learn through gameplay and motivate them to cultivate computational thinking and problem-solving skills
References
1. Adams, N., Little, T. D., & Ryan, R. M. (2017). Self-determination theory. Development of Self-Determination Through the Life-Course, 47–54. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1042-6_4/COVER
2. After School Math & Reading Programs - Kumon. (n.d.). Retrieved April 16, 2023, from https://www.kumon.com/
3. Amado DPA, Diaz FAC, Pantoja R del PC, Sanchez LMB. Benefits of Artificial Intelligence and its Innovation in Organizations. AG Multidisciplinar 2023;1:15-15. https://doi.org/10.62486/agmu202315.
4. Andrade, P., & Law, E. L. C. (2018). User-based Evaluation of Gamification Elements in an Educational Application. Proceedings of the 32nd International BCS Human Computer Interaction Conference, HCI 2018. https://doi.org/10.14236/EWIC/HCI2018.27
5. Aroonsiwagool, A., & Tuntiwongwanich, S. (2021). Development of CT Using Need Assessment and Gamification: A Systematic Review. Proceedings - 2nd SEA-STEM International Conference, SEA-STEM 2021, 146–150. https://doi.org/10.1109/SEA-STEM53614.2021.9668107
6. Atmatzidou, S., & Demetriadis, S. (2016). Advancing students’ computational thinking skills through educational robotics: A study on age and gender relevant differences. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 75, 661–670. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ROBOT.2015.10.008
7. Auza-Santivañez, J. C., Lopez-Quispe, A. G., Carías, A., Huanca, B. A., Remón, A. S., Condo-Gutierrez, A. R., Manzaneda, L. P. M., Gómez, L. M. T., Santander, I. O., Condori-Villca, N., & Aguilar-Medrano, F. (2023). Improvements in functionality and quality of life after aquatic therapy in stroke survivors. AG Salud, 1, 15-15. https://salud.journalageditor.org/index.php/salud/article/view/15
8. Baldeón, J., Rodríguez, I., & Puig, A. (2016). LEGA: A LEarner-centered GAmification design framework. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series. https://doi.org/10.1145/2998626.2998673
9. Barbero, G., Gómez-Maureira, M. A., & Hermans, F. F. J. (2020). Computational Thinking through Design Patterns in Video Games. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series. https://doi.org/10.1145/3402942.3409622
10. Basawapatna, A., Koh, K. H., Repenning, A., Webb, D. C., & Marshall, K. S. (2011). Recognizing computational thinking patterns. Proceedings of the 42nd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education. https://doi.org/10.1145/1953163.1953241
11. Batista-Mariño Y, Gutiérrez-Cristo HG, Díaz-Vidal M, Peña-Marrero Y, Mulet-Labrada S, Díaz LE-R. Behavior of stomatological emergencies of dental origin. Mario Pozo Ochoa Stomatology Clinic. 2022-2023. AG Odontologia 2023;1:6-6. https://doi.org/10.62486/agodonto20236.
12. Beecher, K. (2017). Computational Thinking: A beginner’s guide to problem-solving and programming. Swindon, UK: BCS Learning & Development Limited.
13. Bell, T., & Lodi, M. (2019). Constructing Computational Thinking Without Using Computers. Constructivist Foundations 14(3): 342-351, 2019, 14(3), 342–351. https://doi.org/10.1145/1930000/1922682/110104_AHO-SYMPOSIUM.PDF
14. Belmar, H. (2022). Review on the teaching of programming and computational thinking in the world. Frontiers in Computer Science, 4, 128. https://doi.org/10.3389/FCOMP.2022.997222/BIBTEX
15. Boom, K. D., Bower, M., Siemon, J., & Arguel, A. (2022). Relationships between computational thinking and the quality of computer programs. Education and Information Technologies, 27(6), 8289–8310. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10639-022-10921-Z/TABLES/6
16. Boone, tim, reilly, anthony j., & Sashkin, M. (1977). SOCIAL LEARNING THEORY Albert Bandura Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1977. 247 pp., paperbound. Https://Doi.Org/10.1177/105960117700200317, 2(3), 384–385. https://doi.org/10.1177/105960117700200317
17. Brookhart, S. M. (2008). How to Give Effective Feedback to Your Students. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development, 47–57. http://www.ascd.org/publications/books/108019.aspx
18. Burgers, C., Eden, A., Van Engelenburg, M. D., & Buningh, S. (2015). How feedback boosts motivation and play in a brain-training game. Computers in Human Behavior, 48, 94–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CHB.2015.01.038
19. Caero, L., & Libertelli, J. (2023). Relationship between Vigorexia, steroid use, and recreational bodybuilding practice and the effects of the closure of training centers due to the Covid-19 pandemic in young people in Argentina. AG Salud, 1, 18-18. https://salud.journalageditor.org/index.php/salud/article/view/18
20. Castillo-González, W. (2023). Kinesthetic treatment on stiffness, quality of life and functional independence in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. AG Salud, 1, 20-20. https://salud.journalageditor.org/index.php/salud/article/view/20
21. Cavalcante L de FB. Feminicide from the perspective of the cultural mediation of information. Advanced Notes in Information Science 2023;5:24-48. https://doi.org/10.47909/978-9916-9906-9-8.72.
22. Chalan SAL, Hinojosa BLA, Claudio BAM, Mendoza OAV. Quality of service and customer satisfaction in the beauty industry in the district of Los Olivos. SCT Proceedings in Interdisciplinary Insights and Innovations 2023;1:5-5. https://doi.org/10.56294/piii20235.
23. Chávez JJB, Trujillo REO, Hinojosa BLA, Claudio BAM, Mendoza OAV. Influencer marketing and the buying decision of generation «Z» consumers in beauty and personal care companies. SCT Proceedings in Interdisciplinary Insights and Innovations 2023;1:7-7. https://doi.org/10.56294/piii20237.
24. Clark, D. B., Tanner-Smith, E., Hostetler, A., Fradkin, A., & Polikov, V. (2017). Substantial Integration of Typical Educational Games Into Extended Curricula. Https://Doi.Org/10.1080/10508406.2017.1333431, 27(2), 265–318. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2017.1333431
25. CodeCombat - Coding games to learn Python and JavaScript | CodeCombat. (n.d.). Retrieved April 16, 2023, from https://codecombat.com/
26. Coding for Kids | Game-Based Programming | CodeMonkey. (n.d.). Retrieved April 19, 2023, from https://www.codemonkey.com/
27. Condori, K. O. V. (2017). Teaching Formation to Develop Computational Thinking. 59–72. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-4944-4.CH004
28. Crossouard, B. M. (2013). Transforming formative assessment in lifelong learning. Http://Dx.Doi.Org/10.1080/0969594X.2012.682218, 20(2), 240–246. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2012.682218
29. Dagiene, V., Sentance, S., & Stupuriene, G. (2017). Developing a Two-Dimensional Categorization System for Educational Tasks in Informatics. Informatica, 28(1), 23–44. https://doi.org/10.15388/INFORMATICA.2017.119
30. Darnon, C., Butera, F., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2007). Achievement goals in social interactions: Learning with mastery vs. performance goals. Motivation and Emotion, 31, 61-70.
31. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “What” and “Why” of Goal Pursuits: Human Needs and the Self-Determination of Behavior. Https://Doi.Org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01, 11(4), 227–268. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01
32. Deterding, S., Khaled, R., Nacke, L. E., & Dixon, D. (2011). Deterding, S., Khaled, R., Nacke L.E. and Dixon, D. (2011) Gamification Toward a Definition. CHI 2011 Gamification Workshop Proceedings, Vancouver, 2011, 12-15. - References - Scientific Research Publishing. https://www.scirp.org/(S(lz5mqp453edsnp55rrgjct55))/reference/ReferencesPapers.aspx?ReferenceID=1607385
33. Diaz DPM. Staff turnover in companies. AG Managment 2023;1:16-16. https://doi.org/10.62486/agma202316.
34. Ding, L., Kim, C. M., & Orey, M. (2017). Studies of student engagement in gamified online discussions. Computers & Education, 115, 126–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COMPEDU.2017.06.016
35. Dolch, C., & Zawacki-Richter, O. (2018). Are students getting used to Learning Technology? Changing media usage patterns of traditional and non-traditional students in higher education. Research in Learning Technology, 26. https://doi.org/10.25304/RLT.V26.2038
36. Duncan, C. (2018). Reported Development of Computational Thinking, Through Computer Science and Programming, and its Benefits for Primary School Students. 275–275. https://doi.org/10.1145/3159450.3162325
37. Eguiluz, A., Guenaga, M., Garaizar, P., & Olivares-Rodriguez, C. (2017). Exploring the progression of early programmers in a set of computational thinking challenges via clickstream analysis. IEEE Transactions on Emerging Topics in Computing, 8(1), 256-261.
38. Ehsan, H., Rehmat, A. P., & Cardella, M. E. (2021). Computational thinking embedded in engineering design: capturing computational thinking of children in an informal engineering design activity. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 31(3), 441–464. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10798-020-09562-5/METRICS
39. Espinosa JCG, Sánchez LML, Pereira MAF. Benefits of Artificial Intelligence in human talent management. AG Multidisciplinar 2023;1:14-14. https://doi.org/10.62486/agmu202314.
40. Figueredo-Rigores A, Blanco-Romero L, Llevat-Romero D. Systemic view of periodontal diseases. AG Odontologia 2023;1:14-14. https://doi.org/10.62486/agodonto202314.
41. Finkel, K. (2017). Investigating the lived experience of writing and technology. Oxford Review of Education, 43(3), 348-364.
42. Gonzalez-Argote J, Castillo-González W. Productivity and Impact of the Scientific Production on Human-Computer Interaction in Scopus from 2018 to 2022. AG Multidisciplinar 2023;1:10-10. https://doi.org/10.62486/agmu202310.
43. Gonzalez-Argote, J., & Castillo-González, W. (2024). Update on the use of gamified educational resources in the development of cognitive skills. AG Salud, 2, 41-41. https://salud.journalageditor.org/index.php/salud/article/view/41
44. Good, J., Good, J., Yadav, A., & Mishra, P. (2017). Computational Thinking in Computer Science Classrooms: Viewpoints from CS... Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, 2017(1), 51–59. http://www.editlib.org.cupdx.idm.oclc.org/p/177476
45. Govender, Irene & Grayson, Diane. (2006). Learning to program, learning to teach programming: A closer look.
46. Grover, S., Pea, R., & Cooper, S. (2016). Factors influencing computer science learning in Middle School. Proceedings of the 47th ACM Technical Symposium on Computing Science Education. https://doi.org/10.1145/2839509.2844564
47. Hansen, N. K., & Hadjerrouit, S. (2023). Analyzing Students’ Computational Thinking and Programming Skills for Mathematical Problem Solving. 155–173. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-18512-0_10
48. Hernández-Flórez, N. (2023). Breaking stereotypes: “a philosophical reflection on women criminals from a gender perspective". AG Salud, 1, 17-17. https://salud.journalageditor.org/index.php/salud/article/view/17
49. Hinojosa BLA, Mendoza OAV. Perceptions on the use of Digital Marketing of the micro-entrepreneurs of the textile sector of the Blue Gallery in the emporium of Gamarra. SCT Proceedings in Interdisciplinary Insights and Innovations 2023;1:9-9. https://doi.org/10.56294/piii20239.
50. Hoppe, H. U., Werneburg, S., & Werneburg, · S. (2019). Computational Thinking—More Than a Variant of Scientific Inquiry! Computational Thinking Education, 13–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-6528-7_2
51. Hsu, T. C., Chang, S. C., & Hung, Y. T. (2018). How to learn and how to teach computational thinking: Suggestions based on a review of the literature. Computers and Education, 126, 296–310. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COMPEDU.2018.07.004
52. Hung, A. C. Y. (2017). A Critique and Defense of Gamification. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 15(1), 57–72.
53. Ioannidou, A., Bennett, V., Repenning, A., Koh, K. H., & Basawapatna, A. (2011). Computational Thinking Patterns. Online Submission.
54. Jácome-Amores, L., Rivera Freire, W., & Sánchez Sánchez, R. (2021). Gamification as an Educational Strategy to Strengthen Cognitive Abilities of Mathematics in School Children. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, 1277, 142–150. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-60467-7_12/COVER
55. Kalelioğlu, F., Gülbahar, Y., & Kukul, V. (2016). A Framework for Computational Thinking Based on a Systematic Research Review.
56. Kapp, K. M. (2012). The Gamification of Learning and Instruction: Game-based Methods and Strategies for Training and Education | Wiley. https://www.wiley.com/en-gb/The+Gamification+of+Learning+and+Instruction:+Game+based+Methods+and+Strategies+for+Training+and+Education-p-9781118096345
57. Karavaev, N. L., & Soboleva, E. V. (2017). Analysis of software services and platforms with the potential for gamification of learning. https://e-koncept.ru/2017/170202.htm
58. Kayımbaşıoğlu, D., Oktekin, B., & Hacı, H. (2016). Integration of Gamification Technology in education. Procedia Computer Science, 102, 668–676. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2016.09.460
59. Khutorskoy A. V. Klyuchevye kompetentsii kak komponent lichnostno-orientirovannoy paradigmy obrazovaniya [Key competencies as a component of the personality-centred education paradigm]. Narodnoye obrazovaniye – National education, 2003, no. 2, pp. 58–64 (in Russian).
60. Kim, S., Song, K., Lockee, B., & Burton, J. (2018). Gamification in Learning and Education. Gamification in Learning and Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47283-6
61. Komm, D., Hauser, U., Matter, B., Staub, J., & Trachsler, N. (2020). Computational Thinking in Small Packages. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Including Subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 12518 LNCS, 170–181. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-63212-0_14
62. Kotini, I., & Tzelepi, S. (2015). A gamification-based framework for developing learning activities of computational thinking. Gamification in Education and Business, 219–252. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10208-5_12/COVER
63. Kühn, S., Gleich, T., Lorenz, R. C., Lindenberger, U., & Gallinat, J. (2013). Playing Super Mario induces structural brain plasticity: gray matter changes resulting from training with a commercial video game. Molecular Psychiatry 2014 19:2, 19(2), 265–271. https://doi.org/10.1038/mp.2013.120
64. LailiFarhanaMd, I., MaizatulHayati, M. Y., NorZuhaidah, M. Z., UmmuHusna, A., & Norasikin, F. (2021). Development of Rubric to Measure Children’s Creativity in Game Design. The International Journal of Multimedia & Its Applications (IJMA) , 13(1/2).
65. Lamorú-Pardo AM, Álvarez-Romero Y, Rubio-Díaz D, González-Alvarez A, Pérez-Roque L, Vargas-Labrada LS. Dental caries, nutritional status and oral hygiene in schoolchildren, La Demajagua, 2022. AG Odontologia 2023;1:8-8. https://doi.org/10.62486/agodonto20238.
66. Lave, J. (1991). Situating learning in communities of practice. Perspectives on Socially Shared Cognition., 63–82. https://doi.org/10.1037/10096-003
67. Ledesma-Céspedes N, Leyva-Samue L, Barrios-Ledesma L. Use of radiographs in endodontic treatments in pregnant women. AG Odontologia 2023;1:3-3. https://doi.org/10.62486/agodonto20233.
68. Legaki, N. Z., Xi, N., Hamari, J., Karpouzis, K., & Assimakopoulos, V. (2020). The effect of challenge-based gamification on learning: An experiment in the context of statistics education. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 144, 102496. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJHCS.2020.102496
69. Li, Y., Schoenfeld, A. H., diSessa, A. A., Graesser, A. C., Benson, L. C., English, L. D., & Duschl, R. A. (2019). On Thinking and STEM Education. Journal for STEM Education Research 2019 2:1, 2(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/S41979-019-00014-X
70. Li, Y., Schoenfeld, A. H., diSessa, A. A., Graesser, A. C., Benson, L. C., English, L. D., & Duschl, R. A. (2020a). Computational Thinking Is More about Thinking than Computing. Journal for STEM Education Research 2020 3:1, 3(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/S41979-020-00030-2
71. Li, Y., Schoenfeld, A. H., diSessa, A. A., Graesser, A. C., Benson, L. C., English, L. D., & Duschl, R. A. (2020b). On Computational Thinking and STEM Education. Journal for STEM Education Research 2020 3:2, 3(2), 147–166. https://doi.org/10.1007/S41979-020-00044-W
72. Lodi, M., & Martini, S. (2021). Computational Thinking, Between Papert and Wing. Science and Education, 30(4), 883–908. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11191-021-00202-5/METRICS
73. Lopez ACA. Contributions of John Calvin to education. A systematic review. AG Multidisciplinar 2023;1:11-11. https://doi.org/10.62486/agmu202311.
74. Lu, J. J., & Fletcher, G. H. L. (2009). Thinking about Computational Thinking. SIGCSE’09 - Proceedings of the 40th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, 260–264. https://doi.org/10.1145/1508865.1508959
75. Lye, S. Y., & Koh, J. H. (2014). Review on teaching and learning of computational thinking through programming: What is next for K-12? Computers in Human Behavior, 41, 51–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.09.012
76. Madariaga, L., Allendes, C., Nussbaum, M., Barrios, G., & Acevedo, N. (2023). Offline and online user experience of gamified robotics for introducing computational thinking: Comparing engagement, game mechanics and coding motivation. Computers & Education, 193, 104664. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COMPEDU.2022.104664
77. Marcillí MI, Fernández AP, Marsillí YI, Drullet DI, Isalgué RF. Older adult victims of violence. Satisfaction with health services in primary care. SCT Proceedings in Interdisciplinary Insights and Innovations 2023;1:12-12. https://doi.org/10.56294/piii202312.
78. Marcillí MI, Fernández AP, Marsillí YI, Drullet DI, Isalgué VMF. Characterization of legal drug use in older adult caregivers who are victims of violence. SCT Proceedings in Interdisciplinary Insights and Innovations 2023;1:13-13. https://doi.org/10.56294/piii202313.
79. Masiulionytė-Dagienė, V., & Jevsikova, T. (2022). Assessing Computational Thinking: The Relation of Different Assessment Instruments and Learning Tools. In International Conference on Informatics in Schools: Situation, Evolution, and Perspectives (pp. 66-77). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
80. Monteiro, I. T., Salgado, L. C. de C., Mota, M. P., Sampaio, A. L., & de Souza, C. S. (2017). Signifying software engineering to computational thinking learners with AgentSheets and PoliFacets. Journal of Visual Languages & Computing, 40, 91–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JVLC.2017.01.005
81. Ogegbo, A. A., & Ramnarain, U. (2022). A systematic review of computational thinking in science classrooms. Studies in Science Education, 58(2), 203–230. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2021.1963580
82. Ogolodom, M. P., Ochong, A. D., Egop, E. B., Jeremiah, C. U., Madume, A. K., Nyenke, C. U., Dambele, M. Y., Joseph, D. Z., Bakre, A. F. K., Balogun, E. O., Alazigha, N., Marki .C.Okej, Kenneth .S.Ordu, Chiegwu, H. U., Johnson, J., Mbaba, A. N., & Nwodo, V. K. (2023). Knowledge and perception of healthcare workers towards the adoption of artificial intelligence in healthcare service delivery in Nigeria. AG Salud, 1, 16-16. https://salud.journalageditor.org/index.php/salud/article/view/16
83. Ortiz, M., Chiluiza, K., & Valcke, M. (2016). Gamification in higher education and STEM: A systematic review of literature. EDULEARN Proceedings. https://doi.org/10.21125/edulearn.2016.0422
84. Paiva, J. C., Leal, J. P., & Queirós, R. (2020). Fostering Programming Practice through Games. Information 2020, Vol. 11, Page 498, 11(11), 498. https://doi.org/10.3390/INFO11110498
85. Papert, S. (1980). Mindstorms:children, computers, and powerful ideas | Guide books. https://dl.acm.org/doi/book/10.5555/1095592
86. Papert, S. (1991). Situating constructionism. In I. Harel & S. Papert (Eds.), Constructionism (pp. 1–11). Norwood: Ablex.
87. Pekrun, R., Cusack, A., Murayama, K., Elliot, A. J., & Thomas, K. (2014). The power of anticipated feedback: Effects on students’ achievement goals and achievement emotions. Learning and Instruction, 29, 115–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.LEARNINSTRUC.2013.09.002
88. Peñaloza JEG, Bermúdez L marcela A, Calderón YMA. Perception of representativeness of the Assembly of Huila 2020-2023. AG Multidisciplinar 2023;1:13-13. https://doi.org/10.62486/agmu202313.
89. Pérez DQ, Palomo IQ, Santana YL, Rodríguez AC, Piñera YP. Predictive value of the neutrophil-lymphocyte index as a predictor of severity and death in patients treated for COVID-19. SCT Proceedings in Interdisciplinary Insights and Innovations 2023;1:14-14. https://doi.org/10.56294/piii202314.
90. Perković, L., Settle, A., Hwang, S., & Jones, J. (2010). A framework for computational thinking across the curriculum. ITiCSE’10 - Proceedings of the 2010 ACM SIGCSE Annual Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education, 123–127. https://doi.org/10.1145/1822090.1822126
91. Peteranetz, M. S., Flanigan, A. E., Shell, D. F., & Soh, L. K. (2017). Computational Creativity Exercises: An Avenue for Promoting Learning in Computer Science. IEEE Transactions on Education, 60(4), 305–313. https://doi.org/10.1109/TE.2017.2705152
92. Prado JMK do, Sena PMB. Information science based on FEBAB’s census of Brazilian library science: postgraduate data. Advanced Notes in Information Science 2023;5:1-23. https://doi.org/10.47909/978-9916-9906-9-8.73.
93. Psycharis, S., & Kallia, M. (2017). The effects of computer programming on high school students’ reasoning skills and mathematical self-efficacy and problem solving. Instructional science, 45(5), 583-602.
94. Pupo-Martínez Y, Dalmau-Ramírez E, Meriño-Collazo L, Céspedes-Proenza I, Cruz-Sánchez A, Blanco-Romero L. Occlusal changes in primary dentition after treatment of dental interferences. AG Odontologia 2023;1:10-10. https://doi.org/10.62486/agodonto202310.
95. Quiroz, F. J. R., & Gamarra, N. H. (2024). Psychometric evidence of the mobile dependence test in the young population of Lima in the context of the pandemic. AG Salud, 2, 40-40. https://salud.journalageditor.org/index.php/salud/article/view/40
96. Quiroz, F. J. R., & Oncoy, A. W. E. (2023). Resiliencia y satisfacción con la vida en universitarios migrantes residentes en Lima. AG Salud, 1, 09-09. https://salud.journalageditor.org/index.php/salud/article/view/9
97. Repenning, A., Basawapatna, A. R., & Escherle, N. A. (2017). Principles of computational thinking tools. Emerging Research, Practice, and Policy on Computational Thinking, 291–305. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52691-1_18
98. Repenning, Alex. (1993). Agentsheets. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI ’93. https://doi.org/10.1145/169059.169119
99. Resnick, M. (2007). All i really need to know (about creative thinking) i learned (by studying how children learn) in kindergarten. Creativity and Cognition 2007, CC2007 - Seeding Creativity: Tools, Media, and Environments, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1145/1254960.1254961
100. Roa BAV, Ortiz MAC, Cano CAG. Analysis of the simple tax regime in Colombia, case of night traders in the city of Florencia, Caquetá. AG Managment 2023;1:14-14. https://doi.org/10.62486/agma202314.
101. Robinson, L. E., Palmer, K. K., & Bub, K. L. (2016). Effect of the children’s health activity motor program on motor skills and self-regulation in head start preschoolers: An efficacy trial. Frontiers in Public Health, 4, 173. https://doi.org/10.3389/FPUBH.2016.00173/BIBTEX
102. Rodríguez AL. Analysis of associative entrepreneurship as a territorial strategy in the municipality of Mesetas, Meta. AG Managment 2023;1:15-15. https://doi.org/10.62486/agma202315.
103. Rodríguez LPM, Sánchez PAS. Social appropriation of knowledge applying the knowledge management methodology. Case study: San Miguel de Sema, Boyacá. AG Managment 2023;1:13-13. https://doi.org/10.62486/agma202313.
104. Rojas-López, A., & García-Peñalvo, F. J. (2019). Initial learning scenarios based on the computational thinking evaluation for the Course Programming Fundamentals at inacap. Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality. https://doi.org/10.1145/3362789.3362802
105. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68
106. Sailer, M., Hense, J., Mandl, H., & Klevers, M. (2017). Fostering development of work competencies and motivation via gamification. Technical and Vocational Education and Training, 23, 795–818. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41713-4_37/COVER
107. Sapounidis, T., Demetriadis, S., Papadopoulos, P. M., & Stamovlasis, D. (2019). Tangible and graphical programming with experienced children: A mixed methods analysis. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction, 19, 67–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJCCI.2018.12.001
108. Schunk, D. H., & Mullen, C. A. (2012). Self-efficacy as an engaged learner. Handbook of Research on Student Engagement, 219–235. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_10
109. Selby, C., & Woollard, J. (2013). Computational thinking: the developing definition.
110. Sengupta, P., Kinnebrew, J. S., Basu, S., Biswas, G., & Clark, D. (2013). Integrating computational thinking with K-12 science education using agent-based computation: A theoretical framework. Education and Information Technologies, 18(2), 351–380. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10639-012-9240-X/METRICS
111. Serra S, Revez J. As bibliotecas públicas na inclusão social de migrantes forçados na Área Metropolitana de Lisboa. Advanced Notes in Information Science 2023;5:49-99. https://doi.org/10.47909/978-9916-9906-9-8.50.
112. Settle, A., Franke, B., Hansen, R., Spaltro, F., Jurisson, C., Rennert-May, C., & Wildeman, B. (2012). Infusing computational thinking into the middle- and high-school curriculum. Annual Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education, ITiCSE, 22–27. https://doi.org/10.1145/2325296.2325306
113. Sidek, S. F., Hayati, M., Yatim, M., & Soh Said, C. (2020). Characterizing Computational Thinking for Tertiary Education Learning. Journal of Contemporary Issues and Thought, 10, 58–69. https://doi.org/10.37134/JCIT.VOL10.SP.6.2020
114. Sjøberg, S. (2010). Constructivism and Learning. International Encyclopedia of Education, Third Edition, 485–490. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-044894-7.00467-X
115. Sneider, C., Stephenson, C., Schafer, B., & Flick, L. (2014). Exploring the science framework and NGSS: Computational thinking in the science classroom. Science Scope, 38(3), 10.
116. Soboleva, E. V., Sabirova, E. G., Babieva, N. S., Sergeeva, M. G., & Torkunova, J. V. (2021). Formation of Computational Thinking Skills Using Computer Games in Teaching Mathematics. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 17(10), em2012. https://doi.org/10.29333/EJMSTE/11177
117. Solano AVC, Arboleda LDC, García CCC, Dominguez CDC. Benefits of artificial intelligence in companies. AG Managment 2023;1:17-17. https://doi.org/10.62486/agma202317.
118. Sun, L., Guo, Z., & Hu, L. (2021). Educational games promote the development of students’ computational thinking: a meta-analytic review. Https://Doi.Org/10.1080/10494820.2021.1931891. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2021.1931891
119. Tan, C.-W., Yu, P., Lin, L., Fung, C., Lai, C., & Cheng, Y. (2017). Teaching Computational Thinking by Gamification of K-12 Mathematics: Mobile App Math Games in Mathematics and Computer Science Tournament (pp. 55–59). The Education University of Hong Kong. https://scholars.cityu.edu.hk/en/publications/teaching-computational-thinking-by-gamification-of-k12-mathematics(dd39311c-5137-426d-8439-04a4e85b3af8).html
120. Tatar, C. (2019). ‘A Literature Review: Fostering Computational Thinking Through Game-Based Learning in K-12’, 38-43.
121. Terrill, B. (2008). My coverage of lobby [sic] of the social gaming summit. http://www.bretterrill.com/2008/06/my-coverage-of-lobby-of-social-gaming.html. Accessed 13 Dec 2013.
122. The Radix Endeavor. (n.d.). Retrieved April 16, 2023, from https://www.radixendeavor.org/
123. Thorndike, E. L., & Thorndike, E. L. (1911). Animal intelligence; experimental studies. In Animal intelligence; experimental studies. The Macmillan Company. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.55072
124. Triantafyllou SA, Farhaoui Y, Khouibiri N, Ahajjam T. Conceptualización del diseño didáctico de los planes de clase con LAMS y CADMOS.Salud, Ciencia y Tecnología -Serie de Conferencias 2023; 2:471. https://doi.org/10.56294/sctconf2023471
125. Triantafyllou SA. Conceptualizing the Iterative method of Newton-Raphson for systems with two equations. Salud, Ciencia y Tecnología -Serie de Conferencias 2023; 2:525. https://doi.org/10.56294/sctconf2023525
126. Triantafyllou SA. A detailed study on implementing new approaches in the Game of Life. Data and Metadata 2023;2:95. https://doi.org/10.56294/dm202395
127. Triantafyllou, S. A. (2022a). Magic Squares in Order 4k+2. 2022 30th National Conference with International Participation, TELECOM 2022 - Proceedings. https://doi.org/10.1109/TELECOM56127.2022.10017312
128. Triantafyllou, S. A. (2022b). TPACK and Toondoo Digital Storytelling Tool Transform Teaching and Learning. In Communications in Computer and Information Science: Vol. 1643 CCIS. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-19647-8_24
129. Triantafyllou, S. A. (2022c). Work in progress: Educational Technology and Knowledge Tracing Models. EDUNINE 2022 - 6th IEEE World Engineering Education Conference: Rethinking Engineering Education After COVID-19: A Path to the New Normal, Proceedings. https://doi.org/10.1109/EDUNINE53672.2022.9782335
130. Triantafyllou, S. A., & Georgiadis, C. K. (2022a). Gamification of MOOCs and Security Awareness in Corporate Training. International Conference on Computer Supported Education, CSEDU - Proceedings, 1. https://doi.org/10.5220/0011103000003182
131. Triantafyllou, S. A., & Georgiadis, C. K. (2022b). Gamification Design Patterns for User Engagement. Informatics in Education, 21(4), 655–674. https://doi.org/10.15388/INFEDU.2022.27
132. Triantafyllou, S. A., & Sapounidis, T. (2023). Game-based Learning approach and Serious Games to learn while you play. 2023 IEEE World Engineering Education Conference (EDUNINE). https://doi.org/10.1109/EDUNINE57531.2023.10102872
133. Triantafyllou, S.A. (2023). A Detailed Study on the 8 Queens Problem Based on Algorithmic Approaches Implemented in PASCAL Programming Language. In: Silhavy, R., Silhavy, P. (eds) Software Engineering Research in System Science. CSOC 2023. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 722. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-35311-6_18
134. Tripon, C. (2022). Supporting Future Teachers to Promote Computational Thinking Skills in Teaching STEM - A Case Study. Sustainability 2022, Vol. 14, Page 12663, 14(19), 12663. https://doi.org/10.3390/SU141912663
135. Tsarava, K., Moeller, K., Pinkwart, N., & Butz, M. (2017). Download citation of Training Computational Thinking: Game-Based Unplugged and Plugged-in Activities in Primary School. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/320491120_Training_Computational_Thinking_Game-Based_Unplugged_and_Plugged-in_Activities_in_Primary_School/citation/download
136. Umaschi Bers, M. (2017). Coding as a playground: Programming and computational thinking in the early childhood classroom. Coding as a Playground: Programming and Computational Thinking in the Early Childhood Classroom, 1–184. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315398945/CODING-PLAYGROUND-MARINA-UMASCHI-BERS
137. Van Yperen, N. W., Blaga, M., & Postmes, T. (2014). A Meta-Analysis of Self-Reported Achievement Goals and Nonself-Report Performance across Three Achievement Domains (Work, Sports, and Education). PLOS ONE, 9(4), e93594. https://doi.org/10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0093594
138. Voogt, J., Fisser, P., Good, J. et al. Computational thinking in compulsory education: Towards an agenda for research and practice. Educ Inf Technol 20, 715–728 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-015-9412-6
139. Wang, P. S. (2016). From Computing to Computational Thinking. From Computing to Computational Thinking, 1–253. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781315115320/COMPUTING-COMPUTATIONAL-THINKING-PAUL-WANG
140. Wing, J. M. (2006). Computational thinking. Communications of the ACM, 49(3), 33–35. https://doi.org/10.1145/1118178.1118215
141. Wing, J. M. (2008). Computational thinking and thinking about computing. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 366(1881), 3717–3725. https://doi.org/10.1098/RSTA.2008.0118
142. Wu, M. L., & Richards, K. (2011). Facilitating computational thinking through game design. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Including Subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 6872 LNCS, 220–227. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-23456-9_39/COVER
143. Yee Lye, S., & Hwee Ling Koh, J. (2014). Review on teaching and learning of computational thinking through programming: What is next for K-12? https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.09.012
144. Yung, O. C., Junaini, S. N., Kamal, A. A., & Md Ibrahim, L. F. (2020). 1 slash 100%: Gamification of mathematics with hybrid QR-based card game. Indonesian Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, 20(3), 1453. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijeecs.v20.i3.pp1453-1459
145. Zapata-Caceres, M., Martin-Barroso, E., & Roman-Gonzalez, M. (2021). Collaborative Game-Based Environment and Assessment Tool for Learning Computational Thinking in Primary School: A Case Study. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 14(5), 576–589. https://doi.org/10.1109/TLT.2021.3111108
146. Zhu, H., Kraut, R., & Kittur, A. (2012). Effectiveness of shared leadership in online communities. Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, CSCW, 407–416. https://doi.org/10.1145/2145204.2145269
147. Zhuang, Y., Feng, W., & Liao, Y. (2017). Want more? Learn less: Motivation affects adolescents learning from negative feedback. Frontiers in Psychology, 8(JAN), 76. https://doi.org/10.3389/FPSYG.2017.00076/BIBTEX
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Serafeim A. Triantafyllou , Theodosios Sapounidis , Yousef Farhaoui (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The article is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Unless otherwise stated, associated published material is distributed under the same licence.
