The Importance of Neuroeducation in the Teaching-Learning of Mathematics in Preschoolers
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56294/sctconf2024.1029Keywords:
Neurosciences, Neuroeducation, Mathematical SkillsAbstract
Introduction: neuroeducation, currently, stands out as an essential field to understand brain development and improve the teaching-learning process of mathematics in preschoolers. Objective: determine the importance of neuroeducation in the teaching-learning of mathematics in preschoolers. Method: a descriptive study based on a narrative bibliographic review focused on scientific articles in English and Spanish published between 2020-2024 in sources such as PubMed, Springer, Web of Science and Cochrane. Results: It is demonstrated that neuroeducation allows a significant development in mathematical competencies in post-intervention experimental schools, in addition to this, the positive contributions in social, emotional and moral skills are demonstrated. Conclusions: The development of mathematical competencies in preschoolers is driven by the determined implementation of pedagogical strategies based on neurosciences, led by professionally trained educators, which challenges and overcomes the limitations of the current educational system.
References
1. Racionero-Plaza S, Flecha R, Carbonell S, Rodríguez-Oramas A. Neuroedumyths: A Contribution from Socioneuroscience to the Right to Education for All. Qualitative Research in Education. 28 de febrero de 2023;12(1):1-24.
2. Espinoza Freire EE. Estrategia metodológica para la interculturalidad en la formación docente. Revista Universidad y Sociedad. junio de 2020;12(2):369-79.
3. Fathiazar E, Mani A, Adib Y, Sharifi Z. Effectiveness of an educational neuroscience-based curriculum to improve academic achievement of elementary students with mathematics learning disabilities. Res Dev Med Educ. 21 de octubre de 2020;9(1):18-18.
4. Espinoza FHR, Cervantes RE. Revisión Bibliográfica: La Metodología del Aprendizaje basado en la Investigación. Ciencia Latina Revista Científica Multidisciplinar. 9 de marzo de 2021;5(1):1079-93.
5. Espinoza LAV, Martínez MEM, Gámez MR. Neuro Education InTimes Of Virtuality. PalArch’s Journal of Archaeology of Egypt / Egyptology. 25 de agosto de 2021;18(08):4708-17.
6. Jolles J, Jolles DD. On Neuroeducation: Why and How to Improve Neuroscientific Literacy in Educational Professionals. Front Psychol [Internet]. 3 de diciembre de 2021 [citado 27 de junio de 2024];12. Disponible en: https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/psychology/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.752151/full
7. Procopio M, Fernandes L, Yáñez B, Fernández R. Cooperative work and neuroeducation in mathematics education of future teachers: A good combination? Frontiers in Psychology [Internet]. 2022;13. Disponible en: https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/psychology/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1005609
8. Dorantes-González DJ. Foundations of Neuroscience-Based Learning. En: Chechurin L, editor. Digital Teaching and Learning in Higher Education: Developing and Disseminating Skills for Blended Learning [Internet]. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2022 [citado 27 de junio de 2024]. p. 1-27. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-00801-6_1
9. Janati Idrissi A, Alami M, Lamkaddem A, Souirti Z. Brain knowledge and predictors of neuromyths among teachers in Morocco. Trends in Neuroscience and Education. 1 de septiembre de 2020;20:100135.
10. Procopio M, Fernandes Procopio L, Yáñez-Araque B, Fernández-Cézar R. Cooperative work and neuroeducation in mathematics education of future teachers: A good combination? Front Psychol [Internet]. 23 de diciembre de 2022 [citado 27 de junio de 2024];13. Disponible en: https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/psychology/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1005609/full
11. Caballero M, Llorent VJ. The effects of a teacher training program on neuroeducation in improving reading, mathematical, social, emotional and moral competencies of secondary school students. A two-year quasi-experimental study. Revista de Psicodidáctica (English ed). 1 de julio de 2022;27(2):158-67.
12. Mavrelos M, Daradoumis T. Exploring Multiple Intelligence Theory Prospects as a Vehicle for Discovering the Relationship of Neuroeducation with Imaginative/Waldorf Pedagogy: A Systematic Literature Review. Education Sciences. noviembre de 2020;10(11):334.
13. Valdés-Villalobos B, Lazzaro-Salazar M. Neuroeducation, Classroom Interventions and Reading Comprehension: A Systematic Review of the 2010-2022 Literature. Journal of Curriculum and Teaching. 17 de febrero de 2023;12(1):261.
14. Fernández IMG, Fernández HS, Regalado MEA, Iglesias ML. Educar en la escuela infantil del siglo XXI: diálogo, inclusión y tecnología. 1 de diciembre de 2021;7(2):75-88.
15. Delgado HOK, Fay A de A, Sebastiany MJ, Silva ADC. Artificial intelligence adaptive learning tools: The teaching of English in focus. BELT - Brazilian English Language Teaching Journal. 31 de diciembre de 2020;11(2):e38749-e38749.
16. Forsler I, Guyard C. Screens, teens and their brains. Discourses about digital media, learning and cognitive development in popular science neuroeducation. Learning, Media and Technology. 2023;0(0):1-14.
17. Sheromova TS, Khuziakhmetov AN, Kazinets VA, Sizova ZM, Buslaev SI, Borodianskaia EA. Learning Styles and Development of Cognitive Skills in Mathematics Learning. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 8 de septiembre de 2020;16(11):em1895.
18. Hoyos CFE, Rivero GEA. Emotional Education: A New Paradigm. Journal of Higher Education Theory and Practice [Internet]. 6 de junio de 2022 [citado 27 de junio de 2024];22(4). Disponible en: https://articlegateway.com/index.php/JHETP/article/view/5179
19. Caballero M, Llorent V. The effects of a teacher training program on neuroeducation in improving reading, mathematical, social, emotional and moral competencies of secondary school students. A two-year quasi-experimental study. Revista de Psicodidáctica (English ed). 2022;27(2):158-67.
20. Grant J, Siegel L, D’Angiulli A. From Schools to Scans: A Neuroeducational Approach to Comorbid Math and Reading Disabilities. Frontiers in Public Health [Internet]. 2020;8. Disponible en: https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/public-health/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2020.00469
21. Taghizadeh S, Hashemi T, Jahan A, Nazari MA. The neural differences of arithmetic verification performance depend on math skill: Evidence from event-related potential. Neuropsychopharmacology Reports. 2021;41(1):73-81.
22. Ballesta J, Ayllón M, Gómez I. A Revisited Conceptual Change in Mathematical-Physics Education from a Neurodidactic Approach: A Pendulum Inquiry. Mathematics. 2021;9(15):1755.
23. Martin K, González A, Álvarez A, Santiago S. Involvement of executive functions, emotional intelligence, and study habits in mathematical problem-solving and calculation in elementary school. Revista de Psicodidáctica (English ed). 2023;28(2):145-52.
24. Pérez C, Calle F, Vega M. Learning analytics to predict students’ performance: A case study of a neurodidactics-based collaborative learning platform. Educ Inf Technol. 2022;27(9):12913-38.
25. Caurcel M, Crisol E, Gallardo C. Mathematics Preservice Trainee Teachers’ Perceptions of Attention to Diversity in Initial Training as Secondary Education Teachers. Mathematics. 2021;9(14):1697.
26. Lepore M, Capone R. The impact of changing environment on undergraduate mathematics students’ status. EUR J SCI MATH ED. 2023;11(4):672-89.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Mélida Lucía López Cabrera, Carmen Elena López Maldonado, Teófilo Mesías Morocho Calle, Alba Verónica Vargas Sánchez (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The article is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Unless otherwise stated, associated published material is distributed under the same licence.
