Exploration of Digital Transformation Paths of Different Enterprises Based on Federal Learning from the Perspective of Business Model
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56294/sctconf2024.1150Keywords:
business model, Federal learning, Digital transformation of enterprises, NG Boost model optimizatioAbstract
Digital transformation and upgrading have emerged as central theories for integrating digital consumption with enterprise transformation. This shift is essential for enterprises to meet evolving development needs and establish sustainable interest models. However, practical challenges and a lack of experience often hinder successful transformation, raising doubts about whether digital transformation can genuinely enhance performance. The theoretical exploration of this relationship remains in its early stages, with differing scholarly views on how digitalization affects performance. Objective:This paper aims to explore the mechanisms through which digital transformation impacts enterprise performance. It seeks to address the existing gaps in understanding and to investigate the channels through which digital transformation influences performance, utilizing various theoretical perspectives. Methods:To address high communication costs and data heterogeneity in federated learning, this study introduces local update and gradient compression techniques in optimization algorithms. Additionally, it incorporates gradient tracking to manage data heterogeneity. The paper employs a combination of resource-based theory, empowerment theory, and contingency theory, along with empirical analysis and experimental detection methods, to enrich the research content and depth.Results:The experimental results demonstrate that the optimized NG Boost model is effective in examining enterprises undergoing digital transformation from a dynamic capabilities perspective. This approach proves useful for studying how digital transformation leads to performance enhancement. Conclusion:The study confirms that integrating local updates, gradient compression, and gradient tracking into optimization algorithms can address key challenges in federated learning. The findings highlight the significance of digital transformation in improving enterprise performance, emphasizing the value of dynamic capabilities in achieving performance upgrades.
References
Hermes, S., Riasanow, T., Clemons, E. K., Böhm, M., & Krcmar, H. The digital transformation of the healthcare industry: exploring the rise of emerging platform ecosystems and their influence on the role of patients. Business Research, 2020;13(3), 1033-1069.
Anthony Jnr, B. Managing digital transformation of smart cities through enterprise architecture–a review and research agenda. Enterprise Information Systems, 2021;15(3), 299-331.
Breidbach, C. F., Keating, B. W., & Lim, C. Fintech: research directions to explore the digital transformation of financial service systems. Journal of Service Theory and Practice, 2020;30(1), 79-102.
Renz, A., & Hilbig, R. Prerequisites for artificial intelligence in further education: identification of drivers, barriers, and business models of educational technology companies. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 2020; 17(1), 1-21.
Ceipek, R., Hautz, J., De Massis, A., Matzler, K., & Ardito, L. Digital transformation through exploratory and exploitative internet of things innovations: the impact of family management and technological diversification. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 2021;38(1), 142-165.
Prügl, R., & Spitzley, D. I. Responding to digital transformation by external corporate venturing: an enterprising family identity and communication patterns perspective. Journal of Management Studies, 2021; 58(1), 135-164.
Young, A., & Rogers, P. A review of digital transformation in mining. Mining, Metallurgy & Exploration, 2019; 36(4), 683-699.
Oztemel, E., & Gursev, S. Literature review of Industry 4.0 and related technologies. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing,2020; 31(1), 127-182.
Solberg, E., Traavik, L. E., & Wong, S. I. Digital mindsets: Recognizing and leveraging individual beliefs for digital transformation. California Management Review, 2020;62(4), 105-124.
Nascimento, D. L. M., Alencastro, V., Quelhas, O. L. G., Caiado, R. G. G., Garza-Reyes, J. A., Rocha-Lona, L., & Tortorella, G. Exploring Industry 4.0 technologies to enable circular economy practices in a manufacturing context: A business model proposal. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 2018;30(3), 607-627.
Hofmann, F., & Jaeger‐Erben, M. Organizational transition management of circular business model innovations. Business strategy and the environment, 2020;29(6), 2770-2788.
Jones, P., Ratten, V., & Hayduk, T. Sport, fitness, and lifestyle entrepreneurship. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 2020;16(3), 783-793.
Götz, M. Cluster role in industry 4.0–a pilot study from Germany. Competitiveness Review: An International Business Journal, 2020; 31(1), 54-82.
Jingchun Zhou*, Dehuan Zhang, Weishi Zhang*. Cross-view enhancement network for underwater images. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 2023, 121, 105952.
Jingchun Zhou, Qian Liu, Qiuping Jiang, Wenqi Ren, Kin-Man Lam*, Weishi Zhang*. Underwater image restoration via adaptive dark pixel prior and color correction. International Journal of Computer Vision, 2023. DOI :10.1007/s11263-023-01853-3.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Yalin Gong (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The article is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Unless otherwise stated, associated published material is distributed under the same licence.