Research trends related to road innovation in civil construction of public spaces
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56294/sctconf20241328Keywords:
civil construction, public spaces, road innovation, research trendsAbstract
Road innovation is transforming civil construction by introducing technologies and approaches that improve the efficiency, safety and sustainability of transportation infrastructure. These traffic management systems and real-time monitoring sensors optimize vehicular flow and minimize congestion. The objective of the research is to analyze research trends related to road innovation in civil construction of public spaces. The research approach is mixed, combining qualitative and quantitative methods. A descriptive and retrospective bibliometric analysis was carried out, which was complemented with a documentary review, developed in the Google academic database, Scielo and SCOPUS. The behavior of the researches was decreasing, characterized by a polynomial function with a maximum peak in 2020 of 27 researches. Research in environmental sciences in China predominated. Three lines of scientific research and their main thematic nuclei were identified and explored as key categories and systematized in order to recognize the trends of road innovation in the civil construction of public spaces. The main results were introduced in China with analysis of impacts on the population, use of geographic information systems, environmental pollution studies, among others. Despite international efforts to develop sustainable strategies for the construction and management of public spaces, there are still significant challenges to be addressed to ensure innovation and sustainability in this area.
References
1. Illes J, Kristianova K, Joklova V, Shayegani A. Potential of Former Mill Race Corridors for Urban Regeneration Strategies—A Case Study from Podolínec in Prešov Region (Slovakia). Land. 2024;13(7). Disponible en: http://doi.org/10.3390/land13071012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/land13071012
2. Wronkowski A. Discovering the meaning of contemporary urban squares for its users—a case study of Poznan, Poland. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications. 2024;11(1). Disponible en: http://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-03497-1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-03497-1
3. Unal Cilek M, Altunkasa MF, Uslu C. Urban residents' attitudes towards the impact of public spaces on urban life quality: the case of Adana. Open House International. 2024;49(2):222-43. Disponible en: http://doi.org/10.1108/OHI-01-2023-0007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/OHI-01-2023-0007
4. Abusaada H, Elshater A, Neseem A, Fouad M. Convivial Evening Atmospheres in Old Cairo: Urban Planning and Design Toolkit. Journal of Urban Planning and Development. 2024;150(2). Disponible en: http://doi.org/10.1061/JUPDDM.UPENG-4587. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/JUPDDM.UPENG-4587
5. Robazza G, Priego-Hernández J, Caputo S, Melis A. Temporary Urbanism as a Catalyst for Social Resilience: Insights from an Urban Living Lab Practice-Based Research. Buildings. 2024;14(6). Disponible en: http://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14061513. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14061513
6. Rosenbluth A, Ropert T, Rivera V, Villalobos-Morgado M, Molina Y, Fernández IC. Between Struggle, Forgetfulness, and Placemaking: Meanings and Practices among Social Groups in a Metropolitan Urban Park. Land. 2024;13(6). Disponible en: http://doi.org/10.3390/land13060756. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/land13060756
7. Blečić I, Muroni E, Saiu V, editors. The Innovative Management of Community Space as a Key Strategy to Guide Urban Regeneration Programs: The Experience of the Neighbourhood-Hub Project. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering; 2024. http://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-54096-7_31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-54096-7_31
8. Sonia R, Gupta N, Manikandan KP, Hemalatha R, Kumar MJ, Boopathi S. Strengthening security, privacy, and trust in artificial intelligence drones for smart cities. Analyzing and Mitigating Security Risks in Cloud Computing2024. p. 214-42. http://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-3249-8.ch011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-3249-8.ch011
9. Krommyda V, Somarakis G, Stratigea A, editors. Integrating offline and online participation tools for engaging citizens in public space management: Application in the peripheral town of Karditsa-Greece. International Journal of Electronic Governance; 2019. http://doi.org/10.1504/IJEG.2019.098806. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJEG.2019.098806
10. De Magalhães C, Sieh L. The governance and management of public space. Providing Public Space in a Contemporary Metropolis: Policy Press; 2024. p. 50-69. http://doi.org/10.51952/9781447358886.ch004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.51952/9781447358886.ch004
11. Shan J, Cai G, Lin A, Xu B. Improvement Strategies for Enhancing User Satisfaction with Spatial Publicness in Privately Owned Public Open Space in Post COVID-19: A Case from Italy. Buildings. 2023;13(7):1773. Disponible en: http://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13071773. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13071773
12. Fuady M, Farrel MR, editors. Community perceptions of the comfort and connectivity of pedestrian paths in Banda Aceh city. AIP Conference Proceedings; 2024. http://doi.org/10.1063/5.0201054. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0201054
13. Chęć-Małyszek A. Criteria of livable public spaces quality. Case study analysis on the example of selected public spaces Lublin, Poland. Teka Komisji Architektury, Urbanistyki i Studiów Krajobrazowych. 2021;17(2):55-75. Disponible en: http://doi.org/10.35784/teka.2785. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35784/teka.2785
14. Castellano CG, Raposo O. Public art and social media: street art tourism, sociocultural agency and cultural production in contemporary Lisbon. Community Development Journal. 2024;59(3):533-52. Disponible en: http://doi.org/10.1093/cdj/bsad018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/cdj/bsad018
15. Ramakrishnan K. City futures: aspirations and urban imaginaries in Delhi. Kaleidoscope. 2013;5(1):100-8. Disponible en: https://dspace.uib.es/xmlui/bitstream/handle/11201/149141/554499.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y#page=100.
16. De Magalhães C, Sieh L. Conclusions and the sketch of a practical theory of public space governance. Providing Public Space in a Contemporary Metropolis: Policy Press; 2024. p. 172-94. http://doi.org/10.51952/9781447358886.ch008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.51952/9781447358886.ch008
17. Mukhamedjanov A, Isamukhamedova D, Tang BS. Green Spaces for Summer Cooling: Case Study of Tashkent, Uzbekistan. International Review for Spatial Planning and Sustainable Development. 2024;12(2):163-80. Disponible en: http://doi.org/10.14246/IRSPSD.12.2_163. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14246/irspsd.12.2_163
18. Tehrani AA, Veisi O, Fakhr BV, Du D. Predicting solar radiation in the urban area: A data-driven analysis for sustainable city planning using artificial neural networking. Sustainable Cities and Society. 2024;100. Disponible en: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2023.105042. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2023.105042
19. Brugger J, Hawkes KL, Bowen AM, McClaran MP. Framework for a collaborative process to increase preparation for drought on U.S. public rangelands. Ecology and Society. 2018;23(4). Disponible en: http://doi.org/10.5751/ES-10503-230418. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-10503-230418
20. Certomà C, Chelleri L, Notteboom B. The ‘fluid governance’ of urban public spaces. Insights from informal planning practices in Rome. Urban Studies. 2020;57(5):976-95. Disponible en: http://doi.org/10.1177/0042098018819734. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098018819734
21. Szetey K, Moallemi EA, Ashton E, Butcher M, Sprunt B, Bryan BA. Participatory planning for local sustainability guided by the Sustainable Development Goals. Ecology & Society. 2021;26(3). Disponible en: http://doi.org/10.5751/ES-12566-260316. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-12566-260316
22. Brand D, Nicholson H. Public space and recovery: learning from post-earthquake Christchurch. Journal of Urban Design. 2016;21(2):159-76. Disponible en: http://doi.org/10.1080/13574809.2015.1133231. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13574809.2015.1133231
23. Puchkov M, editor Complex construction: urban design principles and the basis of sustainable development. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering; 2020: IOP Publishing. http://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/962/3/032047. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/962/3/032047
24. Ventura Villatoro KE. La infraestructura verde como solución a las rupturas de la trama urbana. Aplicada al caso de estudio de Santa Rosa de Lima, La Unión, El Salvador [Tesis de Maestría]. Sevilla, España: Escuela Técnica Superior de Arquitectura de Sevilla; 2023. https://idus.us.es/handle/11441/157981.
25. Leite Alves J, Bernardino Borges I, de Nadae J. Sustainability in complex projects of civil construction: bibliometric and bibliographic review. Gestão & Produção. 2021;28:e5389. Disponible en: http://doi.org/10.1590/1806-9649-2020v28e5389. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/1806-9649-2020v28e5389
26. Cartenì A, Henke I, Regna M, Bartolomeo MID, Francesco LD. A stakeholder engagement process for a rational decision-making process in transportation planning. International Journal of Advanced Research in Engineering and Technology (IJARET). 2020;11(3). Disponible en: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3565889.
27. Barbosa T, Sant'Anna Chaves B, Gustavo O. Galvão L, Cruz Lamas G, Paulo de Oliveira Rodrigues P, Gabi Moreira M, et al. Waste-to-energy in the civil-construction sector toward the valuation of wood construction residues: Integration of torrefaction process. Fuel. 2024;371. Disponible en: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2024.132029. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2024.132029
28. Barbosa Júnior IdO, Macêdo AN, Martins VWB. Construction industry and its contributions to achieving the SDGs proposed by the UN: an analysis of sustainable practices. Buildings. 2023;13(5):1168. Disponible en: http://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13051168. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13051168
29. Oad PK, Kajewski S, Kumar A, Xia B. Bid evaluation and assessment of innovation in road construction industry: A systematic literature review. Civil Engineering Journal (Iran). 2021;7(1):179-96. Disponible en: http://doi.org/10.28991/cej-2021-03091646. DOI: https://doi.org/10.28991/cej-2021-03091646
30. Oad PK, Kajewski S, Kumar A, Xia B. Investigation of innovation during bid evaluation process in the road construction industry. Civil Engineering Journal. 2021;7(3):594-613. Disponible en: http://doi.org/10.28991/cej-2021-03091676. DOI: https://doi.org/10.28991/cej-2021-03091676
31. Franco Calderon JA, Estupiñan Escalante E. Movilidad y transporte inteligente: Una revisión de aplicaciones y tecnologías emergentes en el contexto de una ciudad inteligente. Revista Ingeniería, Matemáticas y Ciencias de la Información. 2023;10(20):79-87. Disponible en: http://doi.org/10.21017/rimci.2023.v10.n20.a142. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21017/rimci.2023.v10.n20.a142
32. Liu P, Han G, Yang H, Li X. A Sustainable Development Study on Innovation Factor Allocation Efficiency and Spatial Correlation Based on Regions along the Belt and Road in China. Sustainability (Switzerland). 2024;16(7). Disponible en: http://doi.org/10.3390/su16072990. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su16072990
33. Jormfeldt H, Doyle L, Ellilä H, Lahti M, Higgins A, Keogh B, et al. Master’s level mental health nursing competencies, a prerequisite for equal health among service users in mental health care. International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being. 2018;13(sup1):1502013. Disponible en: http://doi.org/10.1080/17482631.2018.1502013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17482631.2018.1502013
34. Kaur S, Abas NH, Hasmori MF, Ta’at NHM, Amin SM, Sabtu H, et al. Stakeholders' Perception on the Current Practices of Industrial Building System (IBS) Construction Technology. Journal of Advanced Research in Applied Sciences and Engineering Technology. 2025;44(2):199-209. Disponible en: http://doi.org/10.37934/araset.44.2.199209. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37934/araset.44.2.199209
35. Lamba P, Kaur DP, Raj S, Kumar Tipu R, Sorout J, Malik A, et al. Repurposing plastic waste: Experimental study and predictive analysis using machine learning in bricks. Journal of Molecular Structure. 2024;1317. Disponible en: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.molstruc.2024.139158. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molstruc.2024.139158
36. Alsharif HZH, Tong S. Green product innovation strategies for environmental sustainability in the construction sector. Journal of Contemporary Research in Social Sciences. 2019;1(6):126-35. Disponible en: http://doi.org/10.33094/26410249.2019.16.126.135. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33094/26410249.2019.16.126.135
37. Sánchez Suárez Y, Pérez Gamboa AJ, Hernández Nariño A, Yang Díaz-Chieng L, Marqués León M, Pancorbo Sandoval JA, et al. Cultura hospitalaria y responsabilidad social: un estudio mixto de las principales líneas para su desarrollo. Salud, Ciencia y Tecnología-Serie de Conferencias. 2023;2:451-. Disponible en: http://doi.org/10.56294/sctconf2023451. DOI: https://doi.org/10.56294/sctconf2023451
38. Sánchez Suárez Y, Marqués León M, Hernández Nariño A, Suárez Pérez MM. Metodología para el diagnóstico de la gestión de trayectorias de pacientes en hospitales. Región Científica. 2023;2(2):2023115. Disponible en: http://doi.org/10.58763/rc2023115. DOI: https://doi.org/10.58763/rc2023115
39. Tápanes Suárez E, Bosch Nuñez O, Sánchez Suárez Y, Marqués León M, Santos Pérez O. Sistema de indicadores para el control de la sostenibilidad de los centros históricos asociada al transporte. Región Científica. 2023;2(1):202352. Disponible en: http://doi.org/10.58763/rc202352. DOI: https://doi.org/10.58763/rc202352
40. Velásquez Castro LA, Paredes-Águila JA. Revisión sistemática sobre los desafíos que enfrenta el desarrollo e integración de las tecnologías digitales en el contexto escolar chileno, desde la docencia. Región Científica. 2024;3(1):2024226. Disponible en: http://doi.org/10.58763/rc2024226. DOI: https://doi.org/10.58763/rc2024226
41. Hoyos Chavarro YA, Melo Zamudio JC, Sánchez Castillo V. Sistematización de la experiencia de circuito corto de comercialización estudio de caso Tibasosa, Boyacá. Región Científica. 2022;1(1):20228. Disponible en: http://doi.org/10.58763/rc20228. DOI: https://doi.org/10.55204/rc.v1i1.29
42. Leyva Ricardo SE, Pancorbo Sandoval JA. Implementación de la economía circular en la gestión de la cadena de suministro: un análisis bibliométrico. Región Científica. 2024;3(2):2024315. Disponible en: http://doi.org/10.58763/rc2024315. DOI: https://doi.org/10.58763/rc2024315
43. Ichihara M, Inoue K, Fukushi M, Shimizu H, Tsuruoka H, Veerasamy N, et al. Changes on distribution of absorbed dose rates in air in an urban area after the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant accident. Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry. 2021;329(1):427-35. Disponible en: http://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-021-07800-1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-021-07800-1
44. Ouedraogo I, Ouedraogo I, Kpoda NW, Oueda A, Bance V, Kabore J, et al. Impact of road construction on the distribution of Crocodylus suchus (Étienne Geoffroy Saint-Hilaire 1807) in urban park Bangr-Weoogo (Burkina Faso). International Journal of Biological and Chemical Sciences. 2020;14(2):390-401. Disponible en: http://doi.org/10.4314/ijbcs.v14i2.7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4314/ijbcs.v14i2.7
45. Wang C, Duan W, Cheng S, Jiang K. Emission inventory and air quality impact of non-road construction equipment in different emission stages. Science of the Total Environment. 2024;906. Disponible en: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.167416. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.167416
46. Coffin AW, Ouren DS, Bettez ND, Borda-De-água L, Daniels AE, Grilo C, et al. THE ECOLOGY OF RURAL ROADS: EFFECTS, MANAGEMENT, AND RESEARCH. Issues in Ecology. 2021;2021(23):1-34. Disponible en: https://www.esa.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/IIE_24-Rural-Roads.pdf.
47. He Q, Yue W, Lu H, Chen C, Li Z, Wang Z, editors. Consideration and Discussion on Green Highway Construction in Urban Area. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science; 2019. http://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/310/2/022007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/310/2/022007
48. Ji Z, Huang Y. The Impact of Highway Infrastructure on Population Mobility: Evidence from a Sample of 800 Counties and Districts (2000–2019) in China. Sustainability (Switzerland). 2023;15(20). Disponible en: http://doi.org/10.3390/su152014834. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su152014834
49. Shifaw E, Sha J, Li X, Jiali S, Bao Z. Remote sensing and GIS-based analysis of urban dynamics and modelling of its drivers, the case of Pingtan, China. Environment, Development and Sustainability. 2020;22(3):2159-86. Disponible en: http://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-018-0283-z. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-018-0283-z
50. Xiao Y, Zhong JL, Zhang QF, Xiang X, Huang H. Exploring the coupling coordination and key factors between urbanization and land use efficiency in ecologically sensitive areas: A case study of the Loess Plateau, China. Sustainable Cities and Society. 2022;86. Disponible en: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2022.104148. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2022.104148
51. Yu F, Li C, Liu J, Liao S, Zhu M, Xie Y, et al. Characterization of particulate smoke and the potential chemical fingerprint of non-road construction equipment exhaust emission in China. Science of the Total Environment. 2020;723. Disponible en: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137967. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137967
52. Zhou Y, Zhong Z, Cheng G. Cultivated land loss and construction land expansion in China: Evidence from national land surveys in 1996, 2009 and 2019. Land Use Policy. 2023;125. Disponible en: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2022.106496. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2022.106496
53. Yan Y, Zheng Q, Yu RL, Hu GR, Huang HB, Lin CQ, et al. Characteristics and provenance implications of rare earth elements and Sr–Nd isotopes in PM2.5 aerosols and PM2.5 fugitive dusts from an inland city of southeastern China. Atmospheric Environment. 2020;220. Disponible en: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2019.117069. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2019.117069
54. Santos Pérez O. Instrumento metodológico para la gestión de accesibilidad y movilidad en centros históricos cubanos. Aplicación en la ciudad de Matanzas. [Tesis presentada en opción al grado científico de Doctor en Ciencias Técnicas]. Matanzas, Cuba: Universidad de Matanzas 2020.
55. Vijayakumar S, Singaravelu R. Time Aware Long Short-Term Memory and Kronecker Gated Intelligent Transportation for Smart Car Parking. Journal of Advanced Research in Applied Sciences and Engineering Technology. 2025;44(1):134-50. Disponible en: http://doi.org/10.37934/araset.44.1.134150. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37934/araset.44.1.134150
56. Bolden J, Abu-Lebdeh T, Fini E. Utilization of recycled and waste materials in various construction applications. American Journal of Environmental Science. 2013;9(1):14-24. Disponible en: http://doi.org/10.3844/ajessp.2013.14.24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3844/ajessp.2013.14.24
57. Nikmehr B, Hosseini MR, Wang J, Chileshe N, Rameezdeen R. BIM-based tools for managing construction and demolition waste (CDW): A scoping review. Sustainability. 2021;13(15):8427. Disponible en: http://doi.org/10.3390/su13158427. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su13158427
58. Sánchez Suárez Y, Trujillo García L, Hernández Nariño A, Cuervo Saiz L, Sablón Cossío N, Marqués León M. Una aproximación a la economía circular y su contribución en el contexto de la pandemia. Información para directivos de la Salud. 2023(40):e1336. Disponible en: https://revinfodir.sld.cu/index.php/infodir/article/download/1336/1656.
59. Meng MR, Xi C, Feng Z, Cao SJ. Environmental co-benefits of urban design to mitigate urban heat island and PM2.5 pollution: Considering prevailing wind’s effects. Indoor and Built Environment. 2022;31(7):1787-805. Disponible en: http://doi.org/10.1177/1420326X221076815. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1420326X221076815
60. Yang S, Liu J, Bi X, Ning Y, Qiao S, Yu Q, et al. Risks related to heavy metal pollution in urban construction dust fall of fast-developing Chinese cities. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety. 2020;197. Disponible en: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2020.110628. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2020.110628
61. Baeza García E. Reemplazo del permiso de circulación en Región Metropolitana, por un impuesto descongestionador y descontaminador. Revista de Estudios Tributarios. 2012(6):251-312. Disponible en: https://www.cetuchile.cl/images/docs/08._reemplazo_permiso_de_circulacion_en_region_metropolitana___emmanuel_baeza.pdf.
62. Martner C. Expansión dispersa, ciudad difusa y transporte: el caso de Querétaro, México. EURE (Santiago). 2016;42(125):31-60. Disponible en: http://doi.org/10.4067/S0250-71612016000100002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4067/S0250-71612016000100002
63. Galindo Serrano JA, Alcántara Ayala I. Inestabilidad de laderas e infraestructura vial: análisis de susceptibilidad en la Sierra Nororiental de Puebla, México. Investigaciones geográficas. 2015(88):122-45. Disponible en: http://doi.org/10.14350/rig.43790. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14350/rig.43790
64. Rodríguez Acosta R. Hacia una Movilidad Eficiente: Desafíos y Estrategias en Ciudades en Crecimiento [Tesis de maestría]. Bogotá, Colombia: Universidad Santo Tomás; 2021. https://repository.usta.edu.co/bitstream/handle/11634/56102/2024rosyanyrodriguez.pdf?sequence=1.
65. Soto Pérez JM. Análisis de las directrices de movilidad urbana sostenible aplicables al servicio público de transporte terrestre en la ciudad de Santa Marta [Tesis de diploma]. Santa Marta, Colombia: Universidad Cooperativa de Colombia; 2023. https://repository.ucc.edu.co/server/api/core/bitstreams/6d303068-0de3-46a1-8a0a-b32d430f2ac4/content.
66. Pellegrini M, Tagliabue M. An overview of psychological factors in mobility choices: the impact on pro-environmental behavior. Discover Sustainability. 2024;5(1). Disponible en: http://doi.org/10.1007/s43621-024-00372-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43621-024-00372-6
67. Verán Leigh D. Evaluación ambiental de un tramo específico de la autopista Panamericana Sur, usando la metodología de análisis de ciclo de vida [Tesis para optar por el título de Ingeniero Civil]. Lima, Perú: Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú; 2017. file:///C:/Users/Root/Downloads/VERAN_DANIEL_AUTOPISTA_ANALISIS_CICLO_VIDA.pdf.
68. Ruiz Gómez JC. Producción y construcción ecosostenible, para la mejora de la calidad de vida de los habitantes de Michaelshof, en Sammatz, Alemania [Tesis de Diploma]. Villavicencio, Meta: Universidad Cooperativa de Colombia; 2023. https://repository.ucc.edu.co/server/api/core/bitstreams/c23dd55b-a7ae-4c9c-b6ae-a4477a6711ee/content.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Jimmy Jeffrey García Vinces, Claudio Ulise Ross Lopera, Lucy Elizabeth Solórzano Villegas (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The article is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Unless otherwise stated, associated published material is distributed under the same licence.
