Automation of cognitive processes mediated by social systems

Authors

  • Tomas Alves Salgueiro Laboratorio de la Conciencia, IFIByNE, UBA, CONICET. Departamento de Fisiología, Biología Molecular y Celular. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Argentina. Author https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1755-8372
  • María Ayelén Caramés Laboratorio de la Conciencia, IFIByNE, UBA, CONICET. Argentina. Author https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4977-8377
  • Pablo Nicolas Fernandez Larrosa Laboratorio de la Conciencia, IFIByNE, UBA, CONICET. Departamento de Fisiología, Biología Molecular y Celular. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Argentina. Author https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7881-1765

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56294/sctconf202377

Keywords:

Complex Decision Making, Dual Process, Top-Down Modulations

Abstract

Can social systems influence cognitive processes? This question opens up the possibility of thinking about cognition as the individual expression of the interface between physiology and society. The former, guided by genetic processes under developmental constraints, accounts for the neuronal plasticity of the Central Nervous System, which allows diversity in the other level: the social/cultural. Can this level modulate the former? And more specifically: What would be the modulatory mechanisms of capitalist and patriarchal social systems on cognitive processes? Here we propose that these mechanisms involve the automation of cognitive processes, especially in vulnerable social sectors, to the detriment of more reflective processes. Dual process theories propose that cognitive processes can be automatic (system 1) or reflective (system 2). Some of these theories propose that the latter can operate with both the original and the resulting information of the automatic process, affirming or modifying the initial result. The persistence of stereotypes, implicit access to a large volume of information, the absence of social criteria for classifying it as relevant ("post-truth"), the reproduction of institutions as instances of authority and power, and an increasingly demanding, precarious, and pathological daily and work life (chronic stress, burn-out, depression, etc.) are potential conditions that - we hypothesize - could favor a tendency towards the automation of cognitive processes, mainly among workers in general, and women in particular.

References

Bernal FA, et al. Top-Down Modulation Impairs Priming Susceptibility in Complex Decision-Making with Social Implications. Scientific Reports. 2022.

Eagly AH, Wood W, Johannesen-Schmidt MC. Social Role Theory of Sex Differences and Similarities: Implications for the Partner Preferences of Women and Men. In: Eagly AH, Beall AE, Sternberg RJ (eds.) The psychology of gender. 2004.

Morgado P, Sousa N, Cerqueira JJ. The impact of stress in decision making in the context of uncertainty. J. Neuroscience. 2015.

Pennycook G. A perspective on the theoretical foundation of dual process models. In: Dual process theory 2.0. Routledge; 2017. p. 5-27.

Downloads

Published

2023-04-24

How to Cite

1.
Alves Salgueiro T, Caramés MA, Fernandez Larrosa PN. Automation of cognitive processes mediated by social systems. Salud, Ciencia y Tecnología - Serie de Conferencias [Internet]. 2023 Apr. 24 [cited 2025 Jul. 9];2:77. Available from: https://conferencias.ageditor.ar/index.php/sctconf/article/view/254