Emotions and movement in the inter(trans)disciplinary study of human behavior from within
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56294/sctconf202383Keywords:
Emotions, Movement, Behavior, EnvironmentAbstract
Introduction: the word emotion comes from the Latin emovere, relating it to movement; in the Spanish etymology of Corominas the term mover includes the entry emoción, as associated to conmover, motivo (as related to movement) and motivar, from the Latin motoris or "that moves".
Objective: in our long-standing work with people with Parkinson's disease, we have been developing this emotion-movement relationship from an inter(trans)disciplinary perspective, understanding body movement as an anthropological problem that requires a relational, deep and situated view.
Method: argumentation and theoretical analysis and discussion. The methodological approach is based on mixed method research with elements of autoethnography and participant observation, investigating the problem from within. We appeal to evidence from behavioral and social neuroscience, ecological understanding from health sciences, relational perspective from cognitive anthropology and learning perspective from educational neuroscience.
Results: A key concept is paradoxical kinesia, a behavioral phenomenon where the individual relates to his environment through the synchronization or engagement of the perceptual-motor system with the action qualities of the environment or affordances. What our research suggests is that among the affordances that the environment can offer, social affordances can be highlighted, giving sense to the participation of motivation in the improvement of the movement of people affected with Parkinson's disease.
Conclusions: we suggest that social affordances are as much a component of movement as are the bodily elements and physical-biochemical mechanisms that sustain it.
References
1. Morita J, Nagai Y, Moritsu T. Relations between Body Motion and Emotion: Analysis based on Laban Movement Analysis. En: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society [Internet]. 2013. p. 1026–31. Disponible desde: https://escholarship.org/uc/item/8sk5s61w
2. Corominas J. Breve diccionario etimológico de la lengua castellana [Internet]. 4ta reimpresión de la 3ra edición. Madrid: Gredos; 1987. Disponible desde: https://www.academia.edu/29104681/Breve_diccionario_etimol%C3%B3gico_de_la_lengua_castellana_Joan_Corominas
3. Leal Carretero F. ¿Qué función cumple la argumentación en la metodología de la investigación en ciencias sociales? Espiral (Guadalaj). 2017 Dec;24(70):9–49. Disponible desde: https://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1665-05652017000300009&lng=es&nrm=iso&tlng=es
4. Taboada WB. Teorías de la argumentación. En: Lógica, teoría y metodología de la argumentación en México: 150 años de historia [Internet]. México: Gedisa; 2019. p. 127–43. Disponible desde: http://biblioteca.clacso.edu.ar/Mexico/dcsh-uam-x/20201028035625/Logica-Metodologica.pdf
5. Blanco M. ¿Autobiografía o autoetnografía? Desacatos. 2012 Apr;(38):169–78. Disponible desde: http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1607-050X2012000100012
6. Ellis C, Adams T, Bochner A. Autoetnografía: un panorama. En: Bénard Calva SM, Luévano Martínez M de la L, Rodríguez Castro A, Ellis C, Adams TE, Bochner AP, et al. Autoetnografía: una metodología cualitativa [Internet]. 1a edición. México: Universidad Autónoma de Aguascalientes/ El Colegio de San Luis, A. C.; 2019. p. 17-41. Disponible desde: https://editorial.uaa.mx › docs › autoetnografia2
7. Ingold T. Conociendo desde dentro: reconfigurando las relaciones entre la antropología y la etnografía. Etnografías Contemporáneas [Internet]. 2016 Jun;2(2). Disponible desde: http://revistasacademicas.unsam.edu.ar/index.php/etnocontemp/article/view/410
8. Tysnes OB, Storstein A. Epidemiology of Parkinson’s disease. Journal of Neural Transmission. 2017 Aug 1;124(8):901–5. Disponible desde: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00702-017-1686-y
9. Armstrong MJ, Okun MS. Time for a New Image of Parkinson Disease. JAMA Neurology. 2020 Nov 1;77(11):1345–6. Disponible desde: https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaneurol.2020.2412
10. De Miranda BR, Goldman SM, Miller GW, Greenamyre JT, Dorsey ER. Preventing Parkinson’s Disease: An Environmental Agenda. Journal of Parkinson’s Disease. 2022;12(1):45–68. Disponible desde: https://doi.org/10.3233/JPD-212922
11. Lewontin RC. Genes, organismo y ambiente: las relaciones de causa y efecto en biología. España: Gedisa; 2000.
12. Langdon EJ, Wiik FB. Antropología, salud y enfermedad: una introducción al concepto de cultura aplicado a las ciencias de la salu. Rev Latino-Am Enfermagem [Internet]. 2010 May-Jun;18(3). Disponible desde: https://www.scielo.br/j/rlae/a/5RwbrHQkrZ4X7KxNrhwvjTB/?format=pdf&lang=es
13. Lagravinese G, Bisio A, Bove M, Botta A, Bonassi G, Marchese R, et al. Motor Resonance Flexibility to Emotion-Enriched Context in Parkinson’s Disease Patients. Picconi B, editor. Behavioural Neurology. 2022 Dec 30;2022:6487419. Disponible desde: https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/6487419
14. Rizzolatti G, Craighero L. The mirror-neuron system. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2004 Jul 21;27(1):169–92. Disponible desde: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.neuro.27.070203.144230
15. Alonso Recio L, Serrano Rodríguez JM, Carvajal Molina F, Leoches Alonso A, Martín Plasencia P. Reconocimiento de expresiones faciales de emociones en la enfermedad de Parkinson: una revisión teórica. Rev Neurol 2012, 54:479-489. Disponible desde: https://doi.org/10.33588/rn.5408.2011648
16. Dodich A, Funghi G, Meli C, Pennacchio M, Longo C, Malaguti MC, et al. Deficits in Emotion Recognition and Theory of Mind in Parkinson’s Disease Patients With and Without Cognitive Impairments. Frontiers in Psychology [Internet]. 2022;13. Disponible desde: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.866809
17. Wabnegger A, Ille R, Schwingenschuh P, Katschnig-Winter P, Kögl-Wallner M, Wenzel K, et al. Facial Emotion Recognition in Parkinson’s Disease: An fMRI Investigation. PLOS ONE. 2015 Aug 18;10(8):e0136110. Disponible desde: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0136110
18. Kim SI. Neuroscientific Model of Motivational Process. Front Psychol [Internet]. 2013 Mar 4;4. Disponible desde: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00098
19. Rolls, E.T. The cingulate cortex and limbic systems for emotion, action, and memory. Brain Struct Funct 224, 3001–3018 (2019). Disponible desde: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00429-019-01945-2
20. Hammarlund CS, Andersson K, Andersson M, Nilsson MH, Hagell P. The Significance of Walking from the Perspective of People with Parkinson’s Disease. Journal of Parkinson’s Disease. 2014;4(4):657–63. Disponible desde: https://doi.org/10.3233/JPD-140399
21. Rossetti Y, Pisella L, McIntosh RD. Rise and fall of the two visual systems theory. Annals of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine. 2017 Jun 1;60(3):130–40. Disponible desde: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rehab.2017.02.002
22. Souques AA. Rapport sur les syndromes parkinsoniens. Revue Neurologique. 1921;37:534-573.
23. Chemero A. An Outline of a Theory of Affordances. Ecological Psychology. 2003 Apr;15(2):181–95. Disponible desde: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326969eco1502_5
24. Bonanni L, Thomas A, Onofrj M. Paradoxical kinesia in parkinsonian patients surviving earthquake. Movement Disorders. 2010 Jul 15;25(9):1302–4. Disponible desde: https://doi.org/10.1002/mds.23075
25. Schlesinger I, Erikh I, Yarnitsky D. Paradoxical kinesia at war. Movement Disorders. 2007 Dec 15;22(16):2394–7. Disponible desde: https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaneurol.2019.0033
26. Crucian GP, Huang L, Barrett AM, Schwartz RL, Cibula JE, Anderson JM, et al. Emotional conversations in Parkinson’s disease. Neurology. 2001 Jan 23;56(2):159. Disponible desde: https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.56.2.159
27. Mazzoni P, Hristova A, Krakauer JW. Why Don’t We Move Faster? Parkinson’s Disease, Movement Vigor, and Implicit Motivation. J Neurosci. 2007 Jul 4;27(27):7105. Disponible desde: https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0264-07.2007
28. Dillon JL, Bacigalupe MA, Pujol S, Moore ME, Mazza A. Metodología desarrollada para mejorar la calidad de vida de las personas con Enfermedad de Parkinson (EP) mediante la aplicación de los principios teóricos del fenómeno paradojal en el Taller de Parkinson (TdP). Revista Científica de la Facultad de Ciencias Médicas, Tercera Época [Internet]. 2010; 2(2):1. Disponible desde: http://www.med.unlp.edu.ar/revista/archivos/201012/dillon_%28psiquiatria%29.pdf
29. Duysens J, Nonnekes J. Parkinson’s Kinesia Paradoxa Is Not a Paradox. Movement Disorders. 2021 May;36(5):1115–8. Disponible desde: https://doi.org/10.1002/mds.28550
30. Montagne G, Bastin J, Jacobs DM. What is visual anticipation and how much does it rely on the dorsal stream? Int J Sport Psychol. 2008;39(2):149–56. Disponible desde: https://www.hal.inserm.fr/inserm-00445784/en/
31. Brancazio N. Being Perceived and Being “Seen”: Interpersonal Affordances, Agency, and Selfhood. Front Psychol [Internet]. 2020 Jul 30;11. Disponible desde: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01750
32. Gibson JJ. The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception [Internet]. 1st Edition. New York: Psychology Press; 2015. Disponible desde: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315740218
33. Valenti SS, Good JMM. Social affordances and interaction I: Introduction. Ecological Psychology. 1991 Jun;3(2):77–98. Disponible desde: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326969eco0302_2
34. Lo Presti P. Persons and Affordances. Ecological Psychology. 2020 Jan; 32(1):25–40. Disponible desde: https://doi.org/10.1080/10407413.2019.1689821
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 María de los Angeles Bacigalupe (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The article is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Unless otherwise stated, associated published material is distributed under the same licence.
