Socio-environmental diagnosis of community urban gardens in the General Pueyrredon district

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56294/sctconf202388

Keywords:

Urban Agroecology, Community Gardens, Environmental Diagnosis

Abstract

In recent decades, conventional agriculture has increased crop yields but has been unable to guarantee food security for the population. Currently, the food crisis extends throughout the planet, while environmental problems derived from this agro-productive model are becoming stronger and progressively affecting the sustainability of this activity. At the regional level, the southeast of the Buenos Aires province is characterized by conventional agricultural production, with the General Pueyrredon district (PGP) being a faithful exponent of this type of productive activity. Thus, several local organizations and self-convened neighbors develop activities from a critical perspective of the conventional agricultural model. They carry out a movement of protest and action, with the particularity of intervening or carrying out urban gardens located within the urban limits, with agroecological characteristics. Establishing a physical and intellectual space for interaction between the community, whether neighborhood, educational, or directed at society in general. With the aim of developing a cultural exchange, based on dialogic and practical actions in the field. The peculiarities of these spaces motivated their inclusion as an object of study in my undergraduate thesis work in environmental management. A socio-environmental diagnosis was carried out that allowed identifying spaces of urban horticulture that function in a community manner within the PGP. This diagnosis revealed their current situation, their main limits, and potentialities. In addition, a characterization of the different projects was carried out, and they were geographically located. This facilitated an approach to the way in which the different experiences relate to the urban social dynamics of the territories where they are located.

References

Aguirre P. La Situación Mundial. En: Cocinar y comer en Argentina hoy. Buenos Aires: FUNDASAP, Sociedad Argentina de Pediatría; 2015. p. 23-32.

Atucha AJ, Lacaze MV, Adlercreutz E. Economía y Empleo. En: Segundo Informe de Monitoreo Ciudadano. Mar del Plata: Mar del Plataentre todos; 2018.

FAO. TAPE Tool for Agroecology Performance Evaluation 2019 –Process of development and guidelines for application. Test version. Rome; 2019.

García R. Interdisciplinariedad y sistemas complejos. [En línea] RevistaLatinoamericana de Metodología de las Ciencias Sociales. 2011;1(1):66-101.

Manzanal M, González F. Soberanía alimentaria y agriculturafamiliar. Oportunidades y desafíos del caso argentino. Buenos Aires; 2010.

Molpeceres MC, Canestraro ML, Zulaica ML. Reflexiones sobre la orientación de políticas públicas sectoriales para la promoción de modelos agrícolas alternativos: el caso del periurbano productivo de Mar del Plata. Quid 16. 2019;12:220-243.

Molpeceres MC, Zulaica ML, Rouvier M, Cendón ML. Cartografías y caracterización de las experiencias agroecológicas en el Cinturón Hortícola del Partido de General Pueyrredon. Horticultura Argentina. 2020;29(100):232-248.

Sarandón SJ, Flores CC. Agroecología: bases teóricas para el diseño y manejo de agroecosistemas sustentables. La Plata: Universidad Nacional de La Plata; 2014.

Downloads

Published

2023-04-24

How to Cite

1.
Del Rio J, Cabral VN, Sordini MV. Socio-environmental diagnosis of community urban gardens in the General Pueyrredon district. Salud, Ciencia y Tecnología - Serie de Conferencias [Internet]. 2023 Apr. 24 [cited 2025 Feb. 4];2:88. Available from: https://conferencias.ageditor.ar/index.php/sctconf/article/view/265