Some links between transdisciplinarity and scientific research

Abstract

A sign of transdisciplinarity is being able to read between the lines, since what is not made explicit, what is not said with all the letter is captured. Whoever seeks clarity should seek contradictions, complementarities, between reason and passion, between different reasons, between quantitative and qualitative approaches, analogical and digital methods, between pluri, inter and transdisciplinary parts. Nicolescu introduces meaning into science, through its dimensions of meaning, anti-sense, and lack of meaning. It is the responsibility of each one to self-generate, in this case, the method itself. Faith allows the jump between levels of reality and knowledge, to build bridges between knowledge, without the need to appropriate them. It is worth asking, in each knowledge, what has remained, and what has changed, and what could change or remain when related to other knowledge. It should be noted which limits characterize the sciences with which a discipline is related. A level of reality that is not traversed is an epistemological obstacle that has been overcome. Does science develop the causes of its denial, claiming the help of the doxa? Did scientific problems give way to transdisciplinary problems? Transdisciplinarity should not exist, since it turns the idea into an object, into a discipline, and transdisciplinarity should give way to transdisciplinary, the verb that puts us into action to seek bridges and relationships. The results are the product of the interaction of levels, for example, of research and profession, which interact when doing science.