Business science: Overproduction, self-citations and Article processing charge (APC)

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56294/sctconf2023444

Keywords:

Periodicals as Subject, Science, Dissemination, Research, Information Access

Abstract

Business science is a field that has been facing some challenges recently, especially when it comes to overproduction (hyperprolific), excessive self-citations, and charging for publications in open-access journals. To shed light on these issues, a recent study was conducted based on three cases. The first case focused on super-producing authors, where an advanced search strategy was used to identify the ten most productive authors in Brazil in the last five years. The study found that these authors published a paper on average every 2,68 days, a staggering rate. Interestingly, these authors had a direct relationship and published their articles in collaboration, always in the same journal. The papers all dealt with RIFM fragrance ingredient safety assessment, and while they were typical mass production, the citations were very low. The second case examined self-citations, where a research group published 15 papers in the last five years, with seven of them published in a journal that the group had purchased. The analysis found that two of the most representative authors in the research group obtained a significant number of self-citations. Finally, the study looked at the costs associated with publishing in open-access journals. The analysis found that some journals charge many publishing fees for accessing and indexing on platforms, which can be a significant barrier to disseminating research. Overall, these cases highlight the challenges faced by the science industry and the need for measures to ensure fair and transparent practices.

References

1. Faulkner N. Academic mass production | The Past. 2022, January 18. Available from: https://the-past.com/comment/academic-mass-production/

2. Szomszor M, Pendlebury D, Adams, J. How much is too much? The difference between research influence and self-citation excess. Scientometrics. 2020;123(2):1119–1147. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03417-5

3. Fowler J, Aksnes D. Does self-citation pay? Scientometrics. 2007;72(3):427–437. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-007-1777-2

4. Hyland K. Self-citation and self-reference: Credibility and promotion in academic publication. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 2003;54(3):251–259. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.10204

5. Aksnes DW. A macro study of self-citation. Scientometrics. 2003;56(2):235–246. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021919228368

6. Bonzi S, Snyder H. Motivations for citation: A comparison of self citation and citation to others. Scientometrics. 2005;21(2):245–254. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02017571

7. Solomon DJ, Björk B-C. A study of open access journals using article processing charges. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 2012;63(8):1485–1495. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.22673

8. Björk B-C, Solomon D. Article processing charges in OA journals: Relationship between price and quality. Scientometrics. 2015;103(2):373–385. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1556-z

9. Flatt JW, Blasimme A, Vayena E. Improving the measurement of scientific success by reporting a self-citation index. Publications. 2017;5(3):20. Available from: https://www.mdpi.com/2304-6775/5/3/20

10. Kacem A, Flatt JW, Mayr P. Tracking self-citations in academic publishing. Scientometrics. 2020;123(2):1157–1165. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03413-9

11. Hyland K, Jiang F. Changing patterns of self-citation: Cumulative inquiry or self-promotion? Text & Talk. 2018;38(3):365–387. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1515/text-2018-0004

12. Amjad T, Rehmat Y, Daud A, Abbasi RA. Scientific impact of an author and role of self-citations. Scientometrics. 2020:122;915–932. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-019-03334-2

13. Ansede M. A researcher who publishes a study every two days reveals the darker side of science. 2023. Available from: https://english.elpais.com/science-tech/2023-06-04/a-researcher-who-publishes-a-study-every-two-days-reveals-the-darker-side-of-science.html

14. Bornmann L, Tekles A. Disruption index depends on length of citation window. El Profesional de La Información. 2019;28(2). Available from: https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2019.mar.07

15. Ioannidis JP, Klavans R, Boyack KW. Thousands of scientists publish a paper every five days. Nature Publishing Group UK London; 2018.

16. Moreira E, Meira W, Gonçalves MA, Laender AHF. The rise of hyperprolific authors in computer science: Characterization and implications. Scientometrics. 2023;128(5):2945–2974. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-023-04676-8

17. Salvador-Oliván JA, Marco-Cuenca G, Arquero-Avilés R. Hábitos de publicación de la élite científica de España. Anales de Documentación. 2020;23(2). Available from: https://doi.org/10.6018/analesdoc.440101

18. Shen C, Björk B-C. ‘Predatory’open access: A longitudinal study of article volumes and market characteristics. BMC Medicine. 2015;13(1):1–15. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-015-0469-2.

19. Laakso M, Björk B-C. Anatomy of open access publishing: A study of longitudinal development and internal structure. BMC Medicine. 2012;10:1–9. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1186/1741-7015-10-124

20. OpenAPC. Retrieved December 25, 2023. Available from: https://treemaps.openapc.net/apcdata/openapc/#journal/period=2023

21. Hoit JD. Salami science. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology. 2007;16:94–95. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1044/1058-0360(2007/013)

22. Sorbonne Université. Sorbonne Université se désabonne du Web of Science. Science Ouverte, Paris. 2023. Available from: https://www.sorbonne-universite.fr/actualites/sorbonne-universite-se-desabonne-du-web-science

23. Nobes A, Harris S. (2023). Open Access in low-and middle-income countries: Attitudes and experiences of researchers. Emerald Open Research. 2023;1(3). Available from: https://doi.org/10.1108/EOR-03-2023-0006

Downloads

Published

2023-10-08

How to Cite

1.
Pinto AL, Shirshahi S, Varmazyar R, González-Valiente CL. Business science: Overproduction, self-citations and Article processing charge (APC). Salud, Ciencia y Tecnología - Serie de Conferencias [Internet]. 2023 Oct. 8 [cited 2025 Apr. 19];2:444. Available from: https://conferencias.ageditor.ar/index.php/sctconf/article/view/362