Challenges in developing productive skills in English: learners’ insights
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56294/sctconf2024.659Keywords:
communication, challenges, language interaction, productive skills, speechAbstract
Academic writing and speaking are important skills that English major students must acquire during their four years of study. However, they face significant challenges. The aim of this research is to identify the main challenges in productive skills faced by students majoring in English at the Technical University of Cotopaxi from the fifth to the eighth semester. This research used a quantitative approach and with a descriptive statistical methodology. The instrument for data collection was a questionnaire that consisted of 4 sections: demographic data, students' perceptions of academic speaking and writing, challenges of academic writing, covering language, structure, and content. Lastly, academic speaking, covering speech clarity and voice quality, language correctness, and audience interaction. The population of this study were 46 students from fifth to eighth semester of the English major. The data were analyzed using SPSS and Excel statistic programs. The results of this research showed that in academic writing and speaking the challenges that students have are in terms of language, clarity of speech and voice quality. In addition, an interconnection was found between the content of academic writing, and speech clarity and voice quality, language correctness and interaction with the audience. In conclusion, this research identified challenges in academic writing (content, structure, and language use) and academic speaking (clarity of speech and voice quality, language correctness and audience interaction). These challenges highlight the crucial role of clear communication in students’ learning process
References
1. Bodiongan LIP, Deluna CT, Florendo TJE, Tantog AJD, Ed M, Gaan DR, et al. Challenging experiences of English major students in language studies [Internet]. Ijeais.org. Available from: http://ijeais.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/IJAMR221131.pdf
2. Noori A. An investigation of afghan undergraduate English major students’ academic writing difficulties. ftl [Internet]. 2020;5(2). Available from: http://philarchive.org/archive/NOOAIO DOI: https://doi.org/10.18196/ftl.5249
3. Jaya, H., Petrus, I., & Pitaloka, N. Speaking performance and problems faced by English major students at a university in South Sumatera. Indonesian EFL Journal, [Internet], 2022;8(1),105-112. Available from: https://doi.org/10.25134/ieflj.v8i1.5603
4. Oshima, A., & Hogue, A. Introduction to academic writing. [Internet], 3nd edition, USA, Pearson/Longman. 2007. available from: https://d1wqtxts1xzle7.cloudfront.net/65294799/Introduction_to_Academic_Writing-libre.pdf?1609313152=&response-content-disposition=inline%3B+filename%3DIntroduction_to_Academic_Writing.pdf&Expires=1735795513&Signature=bVDtdmDGs4n8gaBoJWNum6kbaljj-Ji6lom0Bv-nC~QH3g0aTV7MwccmN8jYDEZ29E-1e35BGxfFKyIVfF5SlkGIr0h6EQShdMMIUDiamtg0vtCbFDtDlSyehj3vQVYTqG-YMs0~wjcbZOw8~gHjBMu7~eCh0UBYxF3fEnNqwkwhdz7o3GZa8utG0hrAotRqOENaSNQGUV~8x-w7~r4Z4PJLgS9ENMBad2kHW5VsOuFtoiCWzmhKc5SnfWGYJiCRdlovse7UfZ~XSYHgU8ueXyYCn1CRWEVazCzcbyyXfRPeML359K3zQ7WmRJZwTqwAkZVKZlW-b7qPjT~X7fqfGQ__&Key-Pair-Id=APKAJLOHF5GGSLRBV4ZA
5. Caplan, N., & Johns, A. Essential actions for academic writing: A genre-based approach. [Internet],USA, University of Michigan Press. 2022. Available from: https://books.google.es/books?hl=es&lr=&id=gqpeEAAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PR5&dq=Essential+actions+for+academic+writing:+A+genre-based+approach.+&ots=IH01Hg2lXM&sig=w0KEL-oFjLayeoO_8hH8qrwmdiw#v=onepage&q=Essential%20actions%20for%20academic%20writing%3A%20A%20genre-based%20approach.&f=false
6. Hyland K. Hedges, boosters e invisibilidad léxica: notar modificadores en textos académicos. Lang Aware [Internet]. 2000;9(4):179–97. Disponible en: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09658410008667145 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09658410008667145
7. Lorés-Sanz R. When the local becomes international: The lexicogrammar of rhetorical moves in English and Spanish Sociology abstracts. Lang Contrast [Internet]. 2016;16(1):133–58. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/lic.16.1.06lor DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/lic.16.1.06lor
8. Swales JM. Research Genres: Explorations and Applications. [Internet]. Cambridge University Press; 2004. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524827 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524827
9. Hyland K, Jiang F. Is academic writing becoming more informal? Engl Specif Purp [Internet]. 2017;45:40–51. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2016.09.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2016.09.001
10. Nkhi SE, Lebona TV. Challenges encountered by ESL students in the development of communicative competence skills in Lesotho. International Journal of Language and Literary Studies [Internet]. 2023;5(2). Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.36892/ijlls.v5i2.1229 DOI: https://doi.org/10.36892/ijlls.v5i2.1229
11. Enein, A. Difficulties Encountering English Majors in Giving Academic Oral Presentations during Class at Al-Aqsa [Internet]; Master thesis, Islamic University of Gaza. 2011. Available from: https://platform.almanhal.com/Files/4/125400
12. Pardayeva Aziza KN. The importance and integration of listening and speaking skills in teaching English as a foreign language [Internet]. Zenodo; 2023. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.10397106
13. Mantilla, L., Narváez, C., & Carrillo, M. (2020). Listening comprehension to improve pronunciation in students of Mechanics Career-ESPOCH: A linguistic analysis. Polo del Conocimiento, 5(3), 882-902, https://doi.org/10.23857/pc.v5i3.1389
14. Chollet M, Wörtwein T, Morency L-P, Shapiro A, Scherer S. Exploring feedback strategies to improve public speaking: An interactive virtual audience framework. [Internet], In: Proceedings of the 2015 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing. New York, NY, USA: ACM; 2015. p. 1143–54. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1145/2750858.2806060 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/2750858.2806060
15. Millar S. In pursuit of clarity: An analysis of speech education manuals. Lang Commun [Internet]. 1993;13(4):287–303. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0271-5309(93)90031-h DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0271-5309(93)90031-H
16. Tovar, R. Syntactic complexity in journal research article abstracts written in English. Mextesol J [Internet]. 2022;46(2). Available from: http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1357796.pdf DOI: https://doi.org/10.61871/mj.v46n2-2
17. Connor U. Intercultural rhetoric research: beyond texts. J Engl Acad Purp [Internet]. 2004;3(4):291–304. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2004.07.003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2004.07.003
18. Müngen AA. Exploring lexical richness in English-language theses across disciplines: A comparative analysis. J Sci Res [Internet]. 2023;12(2):459–68. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.5530/jscires.12.2.042 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5530/jscires.12.2.042
19. Khan R, Radzuan N, Shahbaz M, Ibrahim A, Mustafa G. The role of vocabulary knowledge in speaking development of Saudi EFL learners. Arab World Engl J [Internet]. 2018;9(1):406–18. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol9no1.28 DOI: https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol9no1.28
20. August D, Carlo M, Dressler C, Snow C. The critical role of vocabulary development for English language learners. Learn Disabil Res Pract [Internet]. 2005;20(1):50–7. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5826.2005.00120.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5826.2005.00120.x
21. Hamad MM. Factores que afectan negativamente las habilidades de expresión oral en las universidades sauditas para niñas en el sur. Enseñanza del idioma inglés [Internet]. 2013;6(12):87–97. Disponible en: http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1078510.pdf
22. Tareen, H., Haand, M. T., & Muhammadi, A. Investigating EFL learners’ perceptions towards the difficulties in oral presentation at Kandahar university. Anatolian Journal of Education [Internet]. 2023;8(1):79–92. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.29333/aje.2023.816a DOI: https://doi.org/10.29333/aje.2023.816a
23. Singh MKM. Academic speaking practices of international graduate students in a higher [Internet]. Ijern.com. 2013. Available from: https://www.ijern.com/journal/July-2013/21.pdf
24. Sana, Sakale. Rethinking speaking skills in EFL (English as a Foreign Language) settings. Sino-US English Teaching, [Internet], 2012; 9(4), 1100-1111. Available from: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c797832c4cf086e5264fcffa3753d9e33856d579 https://acortar.link/7HFPcQ
25. Robillos R. Impact of LoiLooNote digital mapping on university students’ oral presentation skills and critical thinking dispositions. Int J Instr [Internet]. 2022;15(2):501–18. Available from: https://e-iji.net/ats/index.php/pub/article/view/396 DOI: https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2022.15228a
26. Riadil IG. EFL students in speaking skill: Identifying English education students’ perceptions of the psychological problems in speaking. JETAL: Journal of English Teaching & Applied Linguistic [Internet]. 2020;2(1):8–20. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.36655/jetal.v2i1.266 DOI: https://doi.org/10.36655/jetal.v2i1.266
27. Last, S. Technical Writing Essentials: Introduction to Professional Communications in the Technical Fields. [Internet], British Columbia, Canada, University of Victoria, 2019. Available from: https://openlibrary-repo.ecampusontario.ca/jspui/handle/123456789/636
28. Fang Z. Desmitificando la escritura académica: géneros, movimientos, habilidades y estrategias. [Internet], Nueva York: Routledge, 2021. Available from: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003131618 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003131618
29. Bailey, S. Academic writing: A practical guide for students. [Internet], 1era ed. Canada, RoutledgeFalmer, 2003. Available from: https://books.google.es/books?hl=es&lr=&id=6ZlA5rsoxjsC&oi=fnd&pg=PP13&dq=Academic+writing:+A+practical+guide+for+students&ots=7hqj_ubeU8&sig=2fOGTIyT190w6tVgWXaCtFSsCzs#v=onepage&q=Academic%20writing%3A%20A%20practical%20guide%20for%20students&f=false
30. Cai LJ. Students’ perceptions of academic writing: A needs analysis of EAP in China. Lang Educ Asia [Internet]. 2013;4(1):5–22. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.5746/leia/13/v4/i1/a2/cai DOI: https://doi.org/10.5746/LEiA/13/V4/I1/A2/Cai
31. Orwell G. Politics and the English language. Блесок - литература и други уметности [Internet]. 2001 [cited 2025 Jan 2];(21). Available from: https://www.ceeol.com/search/article-detail?id=72714
32. Cendra AN, Sulindra E. Speaking accuracy, fluency, and beyond: Indonesian vocational students’ voices. Lang Lang Teach J [Internet]. 2022;25(2):379–94. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.24071/llt.v25i2.4579 DOI: https://doi.org/10.24071/llt.v25i2.4579
33. Saragih SM, Listyani L-. English Language Education Program second-year students’ speaking difficulties in an Academic Speaking class. SAGA: Journal of English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics [Internet]. 2021;2(2):73–88. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.21460/saga.2021.22.77 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21460/saga.2021.22.77
34. Oflaz A. The effects of anxiety, shyness and Language Learning strategies on speaking skills and academic achievement. Eur J Educ Res [Internet]. 2019 [cited 2025 Jan 2];8(4):999–1011. Available from: http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1231642.pdf DOI: https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.8.4.999
35. Anjaniputra AG. Prevalence of tertiary level students’ critical thinking skills in speaking. Int J Educ [Internet]. 2020;13(1):18–25. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.17509/ije.v13i1.18196 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17509/ije.v13i1.18196
36. Creswell, J. Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. [Internet], 3nd ed. California, Sage publications, 2009. Available from: https://www.ucg.ac.me/skladiste/blog_609332/objava_105202/fajlovi/Creswell.pdf
37. Siedlecki SL. Understanding descriptive research designs and methods. Clin Nurse Spec [Internet]. 2020;34(1):8–12. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/nur.0000000000000493 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/NUR.0000000000000493
38. Kirk S. Methodological and ethical issues in conducting qualitative research with children and young people: A literature review. Int J Nurs Stud [Internet]. 2007;44(7):1250–60. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2006.08.015 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2006.08.015
39. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. [Internet], 2nd ed. USA, Sage Publications. 1994. Available from: https://books.google.es/books?hl=es&lr=&id=U4lU_-wJ5QEC&oi=fnd&pg=PR12&dq=Qualitative+data+analysis:+An+expanded+sourcebook.+Sage.&ots=kGVE5KTYVQ&sig=QdMwbF7qiXFHCx2kVAJ_SsDODLU#v=onepage&q=Qualitative%20data%20analysis%3A%20An%20expanded%20sourcebook.%20Sage.&f=false
40. Newman M. Correctness and its conceptions: The meaning of language form for basic writers. J Basic Writ [Internet]. 1996;15(1):23–38. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.37514/jbw-j.1996.15.1.03 DOI: https://doi.org/10.37514/JBW-J.1996.15.1.03
41. Al-Roomy M. Developing students’ EFL writing skills by enhancing their oral interactions. Int J Appl Linguist Engl Lit [Internet]. 2016;5(5):24–31. Available from: https://journals.aiac.org.au/index.php/IJALEL/article/view/2471 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.5n.5p.24
42. Bae J, Bentler PM, Lee Y-S. On the role of content in writing assessment. Lang Assess Q [Internet]. 2016;13(4):302–28. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15434303.2016.1246552 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15434303.2016.1246552
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Vicente Rodrigo Tovar Viera, Erika Lizbeth Medina Jerez, Madeley Lisette Bajaña Pineda (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The article is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Unless otherwise stated, associated published material is distributed under the same licence.
