Research methods in cultural studies

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56294/sctconf2024.712

Keywords:

cultural methods, set of approaches, principles, cognitive process, practical activity, scientific and practical aspect

Abstract

Introduction: The  issue of using research methods in cultural studies is a key factor in the analysis of cultural phenomena and processes. Contemporary approaches include hermeneutics, structuralism, semiotics, ethnographic, comparative, phenomenological, sociological, and psychoanalytic methods. Each of them provides unique tools for cultural research.
Objective: The  purpose of the study is to analyze the effectiveness of various research methods in cultural studies and to identify their advantages and disadvantages in the conditions of modern challenges. The  research methodology involves the analysis of the structural components of cultural studies and the possibility of applying variable methods for their identification.
Methods: The research sample consists of a set of methods: hermeneutics, structuralism, semiotics, ethnographic, comparative, phenomenological, sociological and psychoanalytical.  The article examines the practices of applying methods for the interpretation of cultural texts, the analysis of structural elements of cultural systems. 
Results: Results of the study emphasize the importance of the integration of interdisciplinary approaches and modern technologies to increase the effectiveness of cultural studies. The conclusions of the study indicates the need to adapt traditional methodological approaches to the conditions of globalization and cultural hybridization. Prospects for further research are aimed at the development of new methodological tools and the use of modern technologies for data collection and analysis. Special attention should be paid to international cooperation and exchange of experience between researchers for the development of global cultural knowledge.
Conclusions: Research methods in cultural studies are crucial for a comprehensive understanding of cultural phenomena, but they face challenges such as subjectivity in interpretation, necessitating improved methodologies and interdisciplinary cooperation

References

1. Zhu B, Ma R, Luo M, Wu L, Fu W. An Identification Method of the Externality of Cultural Facilities from the Perspective of Spatial Distribution of Cultural Industry: A Case Study of Ningbo, China. Buildings [Internet] 2023;13(3). Available in: https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13030692

2. Eshak ES, Baba S, Yatsuya H, Iso H, Hirakawa Y, Mahfouz EM, El-Khateeb AS. Work and Family Conflicts, Depression, and “Ikigai”: A Mediation Analysis in a Cross-cultural Study Between Japanese and Egyptian Civil Workers. Journal of Epidemiology [Internet] 2023;33(7):360–366. Available in: https://doi.org/10.2188/jea.JE20210338

3. Falkof N. Cultural studies in South Africa, or not. International Journal of Cultural Studies [Internet] 2023;26(1):16-21. Available in: https://doi.org/10.1177/13678779221131346

4. Rentzou K, Slutsky R, Gol-Guven M, Kragh-Müller G, Tuul M, Paz-Albo J. A Cross-Cultural Study on Factors Affecting Children's Agentic Action in Their Play. International Journal of Early Childhood [Internet] 2023;55(1):89-112. Available in: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13158-022-00335-w

5. Szulc Ł. Culture is transnational. International Journal of Cultural Studies [Internet] 2023;26(1):3-15. Available in: https://doi.org/10.1177/13678779221131349

6. Matthews MR. Cultural studies in science education: A philosophical appraisal. Cultures of Science [Internet] 2023;6(2):199-213. Available in: https://doi.org/10.1177/20966083231173721

7. Parayil SK. Media and Cultural Studies. In Practicing Interdisciplinarity [Internet] 2023;186–197. Routledge India. Available in: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003329428-13

8. Gullotta D, Lin L. Grass Stage as a Method: (Un)Doing Cultural Studies in China. Notebooks: The Journal for Studies on Power [Internet] 2023;2(1):54-79. Available in: https://doi.org/10.1163/26667185-bja10027

9. Pope K, Hewlin-Vita H, Chu EMY. The Human Library and the development of cultural awareness and sensitivity in occupational therapy students: a mixed methods study. Frontiers in Medicine [Internet] 2023;10. Available in: https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2023.1215464

10. Teoh MW, Kwek A, Wang Y. An analytical autoethnographic study of culture's role in transformative tourism experiences. Tourism Management Perspectives [Internet] 2023;46. Available in: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tmp.2023.101097

11. Dos Santos CA. Fighting disinformation and the subject's social protagonism: interrelation between Stuart Hall's Cultural Studies and Media and Information Literacy. Encontros Bibli [Internet] 2023;28(Special). Available in: https://doi.org/10.5007/1518-2924.2023.e92988

12. Koumoutsea A, Boufounou P, Mergos G. Evaluating the Creative Economy Applying the Contingent Valuation Method: A Case Study on the Greek Cultural Heritage Festival. Sustainability [Internet] 2023;15(23):16441. Available in: https://doi.org/10.3390/su152316441

13. Skaria R, Montayre J. Cultural intelligence and intercultural effectiveness among nurse educators: A mixed-method study. Nurse Education Today [Internet] 2023;121. Available in: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2023.105714

14. Mukhalalati B, Ahmed A, Elshami S, Awaisu A. Cultural Competence among Healthcare Professional Educators: A Mixed-Methods Study. Sustainability (Switzerland) [Internet] 2023;15(18). Available in: https://doi.org/10.3390/su151813793

15. Arya A. An Overview of Textual Analysis as a Research Method for Cultural Studies. International Journal for Innovative Research in Multidisciplinary Studies [Internet] 2020;6(3):173–177. Available in: https://www.ijirmf.com/wp-content/uploads/IJIRMF202003030.pdf

16. Pashkevych M, Shyber O, Kozlovska M, Semykras V, Kabanets O, Korolenko I. The trends of the cultural studies development in the modern conditions: the case of Ukraine. Multidisciplinary Science Journal [Internet] 2023; Malque Publishing. Available in: https://doi.org/10.31893/multiscience.2023ss0516

17. Gibson M. From broadcast media to distributed systems–John Hartley's 'cultural science' and the future of 'old' cultural studies. Continuum [Internet] 2023;37(3), 313-328. Available in: https://doi.org/10.1080/10304312.2023.2250937

18. Cabalquinto E. The Paradox of a Mobile Society: Situating Cultural Studies in the Global South Context. International Journal of Cultural Studies [Internet] 2023;26(1):22–33. Available in: https://doi.org/10.1177/13678779221134308

19. Searight HR. The Value of Qualitative Methods in Cross Cultural Education: A Case Study from a First Person Perspective. International Journal of Methodology [Internet] 2023;2(1):28-33. Available in: https://doi.org/10.21467/ijm.2.1.6139

20. Ali M, Uddin Z, Banik PC, Hegazy FA, Zaman S, Ambia ASM, Ahsan GU. Knowledge, Attitude, Practice, and Fear of COVID-19: an Online-Based Cross-cultural Study. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction [Internet] 2023;21(2):1025–1040. Available in: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-021-00638-4

Downloads

Published

2024-09-24

How to Cite

1.
Polishchuk L, Hubernator O, Volodymyr Pylypiv VP, Shvets I, Kabanets O. Research methods in cultural studies. Salud, Ciencia y Tecnología - Serie de Conferencias [Internet]. 2024 Sep. 24 [cited 2025 Apr. 3];3:.712. Available from: https://conferencias.ageditor.ar/index.php/sctconf/article/view/712