Developing a system for assessing the activities of public administration bodies in public relations
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56294/sctconf2024.764Keywords:
public administration, relations system, public authority, local self-government, communityAbstract
The article is devoted to the current problem of developing a high-quality, universal and effective system for assessing the activities of public administration bodies in public relations, taking into account the specific internal and external conditions of the existence of territorial entities of Ukraine. It is found out that the mission of the institute of public relations is the direct realization of the principles of democratic management in activity of public authority in the conditions of publicity, transparency, openness. It has been proved at the methodological level that relying on a high-quality public relations system, public authorities can make better use of communication and information opportunities to generate the necessary and/or acceptable public opinion on their activities, and, if necessary, organize appropriate monitoring of public opinion to adjust activities to existing or potential thoughts, by making public feedback mandatory. As a result of the synthesis of scientific, methodological and practical studies, the own clarified definitions of the concepts of “public” and “public relations” were provided. The main directions of public relations in local self-government bodies were formed and analyzed. A universal and effective system for assessing the activities of public administration bodies in public relations has been established. The main elements of the system for assessing the activities of public administration bodies in public relations were analysed. Public participation in decision-making requires an effective system with full transparency, engaged local leadership, strong feedback mechanisms, and community involvement in projects affecting diverse social groups
References
1. Ladychenko V. Problems of interaction between the state and civil society. Publ Law. 2016 Sep;4(24):18-25.
2. Hanovs D, Volkov V. Chapter 5 Types of Social Memory and the Subordination of Identities of Ethnic Minorities in Latvia. Val Inq Book Ser. 2021;359:105–128.
3. Krakhmalova T. Methodological and legal aspects of evaluating the effectiveness of corporate management of companies. Management: Collection of Scientific Papers. 2023;2(38):168-179. https://doi.org/10.30857/2415-3206.2023.2.14
4. Shaulska HM. Mechanisms of public interaction with public authorities in Ukraine. Kyiv: Institute of Legislation of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine; 2018.
5. Bekeshkina I, Yablonskyi V, Andriuchenko T. Civil society of Ukraine: modern practices and challenges of development: Analytical report. Kyiv: National Institute for Strategic Studies; 2018.
6. Ahafonova H, Karchevska O. The latest opportunities for mass communication as a factor in the transformation of the world political process. Gilea Sci Bull Collect Sci Work. 2018 Apr;132:312-316.
7. Avanesova NE, Mordovtsev OS, Serhiienko YuI. Theoretical and methodological principles of identification and the relationship of the impact of destabilizing factors on the economic security of industrial enterprises. Busin Inf. 2020 Febr;9:20-28.
8. Kozakov V, Rashkovska O, Rebkalo V, Romanenko Ye, Chaplai I. State and public communication: The path from crisis to interaction. Kyiv: Personal; 2017.
9. Sierikov AV. To substantiate the synergetic public administration (on the example of the labor market). Theor Pract Publ Admin. 2019 Nov;2(65):159-171.
10. Bowles N. Human contact is now a luxury good. NYT. 2019. https://www.nytimes.com.
11. Korniievskyi O. On the state of development of civil society in Ukraine: An analytical report. Kyiv: National Institute for Strategic Studies; 2017.
12. Marchuk V. Social communications in the processes of political globalization. Bull Precarp Nat Univ Polit. 2014 Oct;10:6-18.
13. Lozytska I, Bashtannyk V. Theoretical and methodological basis of implementation of the foreign experience of administrative regulation in the system of public administration. Riga: Baltija Publishing; 2018.
14. Nepomnyashchyy OM, Marusheva OA, Prav YuH, Medvedchuk OV, Lahunova IA. Certain aspects of the system of public administration of universities: World practices and the Ukrainian dimension. J Nat Acad Leg Sci Ukr. 2021 Jan;28(1):99-105.
15. Nepomnyashchyy O. Marketing communications management in the public administration system. Int J Crim Sociol. 2020 Sep;9:2882-2890
16. Romanenko Y. Place and role of communication in public policy. Act Probl Econ. 2016 Jan;176(2):25-31.
17. Lelechenko AP, Diegtiar OA, Lebedinska OY, Derun TM, Berdanova OV. Mechanisms of inter-state communications for solving sustainable development problems. Asia Life Sci Suppl. 2020 Febr;29(2):1-9.
18. Diegtiar OA, Orlova NS, Kozureva OV, Shapovalova АM, Prykazka SІ. Financial capacity of territorial communities: European experience and Ukrainian case. Collect Sci Work “Fin Cred Activ Probl Theor Pract”. 2019 Apr;4(31):516-526.
19. Gevorkyan AYu, Druhova OS, Klepikova SV. Factors influencing the determination of investment attractiveness and business value. Bull Nat Tech Univ “Khark Polyt Instit”. 2018 Dec;19(1295):131-134.
20. Kruhlov V, Tereshchenko D. Public-private partnership as tool for developing regional labor potential. Sci Innov. 2019 Dec;15:5-13.
21. Volkov VV. Integrating society in Latvia: Positions of ethnic minorities. Sots Issled. 2012;4:54–63.
22. Diegtiar OA, Kravchenko TA, Yevmieshkina OL, Sych TV, Linetska YM. Optimisation of information and communication systems of local government. Elect Gov. 2023;19(6):734–746.
23. Shynkar T, Levchenko T. Manipulative technologies in terms of information security. Society. Document. Communication. 2023;8(2):270-286. https://doi.org/10.31470/2518-7600-2023-19-270-286
24. Dzyana H, Dzyanyy R. Public administrative activity in the conditions of contemporary uncertainty: information and communication aspect. Democratic Governance. 2023;16(1):37-51. https://doi.org/10.23939/dg2023.01.037
25. Omurzakova A, Shalbolova U, Mukhanova G. Risk assessment of social public-private partnership projects. Publ Policy Adm. 2022;21(2):140–150.
26. Cherniavska O, Kaznodii V. The innovative marketing management systems in digitalization conditions. Management: Collection of Scientific Papers. 2023;2(38):96-106. https://doi.org/10.30857/2415-3206.2023.2.8
27. Makhnitskaya EI, Shalbolova UZ. Regional model of investment innovative processes development. Act Probl Econ. 2012;133(7):414–426.
28. Shahini E. Economic evolution of Durres University: A historical perspective from 1803 to 2030. Sal Cien Tecn Ser Conf. 2024;3:1011.
29. Law of Ukraine No. 4572-VI “On Public Association”. 2012 March. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/4572-17#Text
30. Civil Society in Ukraine: The View of Citizens. Democratic initiatives named after I. Kucheriv. 2019 Oct. https://dif.org.ua/article/gromadyanske-suspilstvo-v-ukraini-poglyad-gromadyan
31. The Potential of Ukrainian Civil Society Is Among the Priorities of the New EU Roadmap 2018 Aug. https://euprostir.org.ua/stories/135284.
32. Hysi A, Avdulaj J, Shahini E, Goga I, Shahini E. Role of legal regulation in the establishment and development of the public administration system with local self-government aspects. Social and Legal Studios. 2024;7(1):27–36. https://doi.org/10.32518/sals1.2024.27
33. Vojtyk O. Peculiarities of administrative decision-making in local government bodies. Democratic Governance. 2023;16(1):63-74. https://doi.org/10.23939/dg2023.01.063
34. Diegtiar OA, Kravchenko TA, Yevmieshkina OL, Sych TV, Linetska YM. Innovative foundations for optimizing the information and communication system of local government. Publ Policy Adm. 2022;21(5):606–617.
35. Falcão L. Machiavelli and the origin of the political communities. Trans/Form/Acao. 2023;46(1):149-170.
36. Karamyshev DV. Global development index as indicator of global governance: Integrated assessment of OECD member countries development. Publ Policy Adm. 2019;18(4):377–394.
37. Abdrasulov E, Saktaganova A, Saktaganova I, Zhenissov S, Toleuov Z. Legal awareness and its significance when determining the nature of a person’s legal behaviour. Int J Elect Sec Dig Forens. 2023;15(6):578–590.
38. Zaverukha V, Zarosylo V, Kaplya O, Grokholskyi V, Podolyaka A. Administration of the process of rule-making activity in some countries of the European Union and Ukraine: A comparative analysis. JUS Riv Sci Giurid. 2023;9(2):263-271.
39. Doskeyeva GZ, Omarkhan DN, Konopyanova GA, Bordiyanu IV, Bekova RZ. Government funding for higher education: Foreign and Kazakhstan experience. Life Sci J. 2014;11(6):174–178.
40. Vorotina NV, Koval O, Vorotin V, Prodanyk V, Shynkarov A. Legal foundations and features of public administration in the budgetary sphere in Ukraine and abroad. JUS Riv Sci Giurid. 2023;9(2):247-262.
41. Adanbekova ZN, Omarova AB, Yermukhametova SR, Khudaiberdina GA, Tynybekov ST. Features of the conclusion of a civil transaction on the internet. Int J Elect Sec Dig Forens. 2022;14(1):19–36.
42. Nurmukhametov NN, Islyam GI, Zhamieva AE, Bordiyanu IV, Suieubayeva SN. The influence of fiscal factors on the sustainability of the regional economy development. Riv Stud sulla Sostenib. 2023;13(1):249–265.
43. Adamkulova CU, Tynaliev KK. Influence of tax revenues on the economic growth of the country. Proceed Eng Sci. 2023;5(S2):431–438
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Tetyana I. Pakhomova , Ella V. Mamontova , Mariia H. Tsedik , Larysa V. Kurnosenko , Karina Ya. Kucheriava (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The article is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Unless otherwise stated, associated published material is distributed under the same licence.
