Assessment and comparison of defense sufficiency levels of some countries of the world

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56294/sctconf2024.765

Keywords:

Military security, Optimal and current level, Range of values, Defense sector, National economy

Abstract

The article explores the evolving concept of security and defense, emphasizing recent EU initiatives that address a wide range of threats and aim to enhance national and European security through integrated and innovative approaches. The purpose of the study is to calculate and evaluate the defense capability levels of individual countries, explain them using the proposed approach, assess them within permissible limits, and compare various national economic sectors affecting the needs of the security and defense sector (SDS). The main research methods are empirical methods (analysis and synthesis), deduction, and graphic analysis. The article provides a schematic algorithm for assessing defense capability levels, introduces the use of a “need coefficient” for SDS calculations, and includes sector-specific data (using US indicators) on material and non-material values. It also suggests using an efficiency ratio to compare current and optimal defense capabilities. The level of defense capability of the countries was assessed according to the scales defined by the authors. Using a system of indicators, rather than a single complex indicator, provides a comprehensive view of defense sufficiency and allows for a detailed evaluation of its components. Thus, an approach is provided not only to determine the current and optimal levels of the country’s defense capability, but also to assess the nature of the influence of individual branches of the national economy on ensuring the defense and security needs of the state (by area)

References

1. Zedner L. The concept of security: An agenda for comparative analysis. Leg Stud. [Internet] 2003 [cited:25/May/2024]; 23(1):153-175.

2. Saputro GE, Tarigan H, Rajab DDA. The role of defense economic in economic growth. J Pertah. [Internet] 2021 [cited:25/May/2024]; 7(2):330-341.

3. Karyonov M. Best security practices in azure cloud: discussion on how to build and maintain a secure environment within azure, including access controls and monitoring. J Balk Tribol Assoc. 2023;29(6):928-944.

4. Kakeshov BD, Kanybekova BK, Seidakmatov NA, Zheenalieva AO, Kokoeva AM. Political and Legal Aspects of Criminal and Administrative Responsibility for Information Security Offences in the Context of National Security of the Kyrgyz Republic. Econ Aff (New Delh). 2023;68:987–993.

5. Ghiasi M, Niknam T, Wang Z, Mehrandezh M, Dehghani M, Ghadimi N. A comprehensive review of cyber-attacks and defense mechanisms for improving security in smart grid energy systems: Past, present and future. Electr Pow Syst Res. [Internet] 2023 [cited:25/May/2024]; 215(Part A):108975.

6. Dashkovska А. National security and defense council of Ukraine: Administrative and legal status. Law Journal of the National Academy of Internal Affairs. 2023;13(1):53-62. https://doi.org/10.56215/naia-chasopis/1.2023.53.

7. Hysi A, Avdulaj J, Shahini E, Goga I, Shahini E. Role of legal regulation in the establishment and development of the public administration system with local self-government aspects. Social and Legal Studios. 2024;7(1):27–36. https://doi.org/10.32518/sals1.2024.27

8. Svitak VV. Methodicalapproach to performance assessment level of individual training of military specialists in educational centers of the armed forces of Ukraine. Scientia et Societus. 2023;1(3):82-91. https://doi.org/10.31470/2786-6327/2023/3/82-91

9. Romaniuk M, Bandura I, Hrytsiuk Y, Volynets V, Komenda N. Determinants of energy efficiency and energy supply of post-communist economies in the Baltic region. J Balk Tribol Assoc. 2023;29(6):1047-1065

10. Commission unveils significant actions to contribute to European Defense, boost innovation and address strategic dependencies; 2022. https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/IP_22_924

11. Singh C, Chauhan D. Review on security vulnerabilities and defense mechanism in drone technology. In: Autonomous Vehicles Volume 1: Using Machine Intelligence. (Beverly: Scrivener Publishing; 2022. p. 113-132.

12. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions; 2022. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:52022DC0061

13. Amici F. Properties Located in Area of Military Interest and Restrictions on Non-EU Citizens Owning. JUS Riv Sci Giurid. 2024;2024(1):78-96.

14. Dikhtiievskyi P, Pashinskyi V, Zadyraka N, Сhupryna L, Kryvenko O. Military and administrative law: development trends in the context of Russian military aggression challenges and threats. JUS Riv Sci Giurid. 2023;2023(3):277-298.

15. Koropatnik I, Karelin V, Boikov A, Shopina I, Khrystynchenko N. Activities of the ministry of defense in ukraine and military administration during the special period. J Leg Ethic Regul Iss. 2020;23(1):1–6.

16. Shopina I, Khrystynchenko N, Koropatnik I, Khomiakov D, Zaitsev M. Development of Integrity and Intolerance to Corruption in the System of Preparation for Military Service. J Curric Teach. 2022;11(3):112–120. https://doi.org/10.5430/jct.v11n3p112

17. Shahini E, Fedorchuk M, Hruban V, Fedorchuk V, Sadovoy O. Renewable energy opportunities in Ukraine in the context of blackouts. Int J Environ Stud. 2024;81(1):125–133.

18. Communication “Updating the 2020 New Industrial Strategy: Building a stronger Single Market for Europe’s recovery”; 2021. https://commission.europa.eu/document/9ab0244c-6ca3-4b11-bef9-422c7eb34f39_en

19. Pompò M. The weight of the “Health War” on economic growth. In: Handbook of Research on Complexities, Management, and Governance in Healthcare. Hershey: IGI Global; 2023. p. 107-114.

20. Abdullayev K, Aliyeva A, Ibrahimova K, Badalova S, Hajizada S. Current trends in digital transformation and their impact on the national economy. Scientific Bulletin of Mukachevo State University. Series “Economics”. 2024;11(1):9-18. https://doi.org/10.52566/msu-econ1.2024.09

21. Ketners K. Developing potential budget reform for Latvia: Shifting from conventional to contemporary budgeting. Social and Legal Studios. 2024;7(2):55–63. https://doi.org/10.32518/sals2.2024.55

22. Karamyshev DV. Global development index as indicator of global governance: Integrated assessment of OECD member countries development. Publ Policy Adm. 2019;18(4):377–394.

23. Skarbøvik E, Shumka S, Mukaetov D, Nagothu US. Harmonised monitoring of Lake Macro Prespa as a basis for integrated water resources management. Irrig Drain Syst. 2010;24(3-4):223–238.

24. Semenenko O, Chernyshova I, Dobrovolska L, Kharitonov K, Motrunych I. Logical-linguistic model of condition assessment military and economic security of the state. J Sci Paper “Soc Dev Secur”. [Internet] 2020 [cited:25/May/2024]; 10(5):28-37.

25. Egorov SN, Semenenko OM, Tarasov OV. Basic principles, tasks and priorities of ensuring the military-economic security of Ukraine. Sci Eur. [Internet] 2021 [cited:25/May/2024]; 81(1):21-27.

26. Lysiuk VS. Ukraine’s defense industry is a driver of building a qualitatively new Ukrainian economy. Grail Sci. [Internet] 2023 [cited:25/May/2024]; 27:39-41.

27. Andriychuk OV, Nebava MI. Interconnection of defense funding and sustainable development of the national economy. In: Materials of the VI International Scientific and Practical Conference “Modern Trends in the Development of Financial and Innovation-Investment Processes in Ukraine”. Vinnytsia: Vinnytsia National Technical University; 2023. p. 25-27.

28. Dzhuraieva O. Theoretical and legal aspect of the function of ensuring the national security of the modern state. Sci Bull Int Human Univ Ser Jurisp. [Internet] 2021 [cited:25/May/2024]; 53:8-11.

29. Greer B. European economic security. In: Securing Europe’s Future. London: Routledge; 2021. p. 221-241.

30. Jeon HJ, Lee MG. Real-time military security index calculation model using big data analytics: The case of South Korea. Soc Sci. [Internet] 2022 [cited:25/May/2024]; 11(12):572.

31. Skyba OP, Balaban SM, Pik AI. Construction of intersecting lines of surfaces. Ternopil: Ternopil Ivan Puluj National Technical University; 2019.

32. Dashkevych AO, Ohotska OV. A generalised method of spatial processing of point sets on the plane. Mod Probl Model. [Internet] 2021 [cited:25/May/2024]; 23:65-72.

33. Hubeladze I. Community identity in the conditions of interstate military-political confrontation: Conceptualization of the concept. Scientific Studios on Social and Political Psychology. 2023;51(54):4-10. https://doi.org/10.61727/sssppj/1.2023.04

34. Chumachenko S, Popel V. A systematic approach to the automation of the processes of ensuring personnel competence at critical infrastructure facilities of the defense forces of Ukraine. Bulletin of Cherkasy State Technological University. 2023;(3):141–155. https://doi.org/10.24025/2306-4412.3.2023.288836

35. Horowitz D. The Israel defense forces: A civilianized military in a partially militarized society. In: Soldiers, Peasants, and Bureaucrats. London: Routledge; 2021. p. 77-106.

36. Grzebalska W. Regendering defense through a national-conservative platform? The case of Polish paramilitary organizing. Crit Milit Stud. 2023 Sep;9(2):259-278.

37. Reis J, Rosado DP, Ribeiro DF, Melão N. Quintuple Helix Innovation Model for the European Union defense industry – An empirical research. Sustain. [Internet] 2022 [cited:25/May/2024]; 14(24):16499.

38. Rusdiana D, Ali Y, Thamrin S, Sarjito A. Defense industry cycle: Development of highly competitive national defense industry technology. J Surv Fisher Sci. [Internet] 2023 [cited:25/May/2024]; 10(4S):3465-3472.

39. Buil R, Piera MA, Gusev M, Ginters E, Aizstrauts A. Mas simulation for decision making in urban policy design: Bicycle infrastructure. In: International Conference on Harbour, Maritime and Multimodal Logistics Modelling and Simulation. Bergeggi: I3M Conference; 2015. p. 95–102.

40. Odehnal J, Neubauer J. Economic, security, and political determinants of military spending in NATO countries. Defenc Peac Econ. [Internet] 2020 [cited:25/May/2024]; 31(5):517-531.

41. Paul Dunne J, Smith RP. Military expenditure, investment and growth. Defenc Peac Econ. [Internet] 2020 [cited:25/May/2024]; 31(6):601-614

Downloads

Published

2024-09-01

How to Cite

1.
Semenenko O, Tolok P, Ostrovskyi S, Tkachenko V, Remez A. Assessment and comparison of defense sufficiency levels of some countries of the world. Salud, Ciencia y Tecnología - Serie de Conferencias [Internet]. 2024 Sep. 1 [cited 2024 Oct. 8];3:.765. Available from: https://conferencias.ageditor.ar/index.php/sctconf/article/view/765