Principles of public administration in the modern social sphere of Ukraine

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56294/sctconf2024.767

Keywords:

State, Management, Governance, Public administration, Methods of organizing management, Economy of Ukraine and its regions

Abstract

Introduction: Public administration plays a crucial role in managing the social sphere and implementing social policies in modern societies. In Ukraine, the social sphere serves citizens' interests and supports societal values, but realizing its potential requires effective governance through public institutions. Objective: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the key features and principles of public administration in Ukraine's modern social sphere. Methods: This study employed analysis, modeling, and historical methods to review relevant legislation, government reports, and academic literature on public administration and social policy in Ukraine. Results: The research highlights management as a critical element in Ukraine's social sphere administration due to various factors influencing social policy changes. Effective governance reduces inequality and supports citizens facing diverse issues. Key features include the social sphere's role in protecting human rights within political and legal systems, state support encompassing direct payments and other assistance like psychological aid, local and regional levels having significant potential for social work administration, and wartime conditions necessitating adapted governance mechanisms and targeted support for affected populations. Conclusions: Public administration in Ukraine's social sphere requires balancing multiple priorities to uphold citizens' rights and welfare. While facing challenges, the system demonstrates adaptability, particularly in crisis response. Further reforms and efficiency improvements could enhance its capacity to meet societal needs and support Ukraine's development goals

References

1. Kyryliuk V, Ryabokon I. Role of social sphere in ensuring quality of working life. VUZF Rev [Internet]. 2021 [cited: 21/02/2023];6(3):66-77. Available in: https://media.neliti.com/media/publications/548637-role-of-social-sphere-in-ensuring-qualit-ce108780.pdf

2. Adamkulova CU, Tynaliev KK. Influence of tax revenues on the economic growth of the country. Proceed Eng Sci. 2023;5(S2):431–438.

3. Ketners K, Tsiatkovska O. Fight against corruption: Analysis of strategies and impact of anti-corruption measures on the social and economic development of society in Ukraine. European Chronicle. 2024;9(1):16-25. https://doi.org/10.59430/euch/1.2024.16

4. Sitthiyot T, Holasut K. A simple method for measuring inequality. Humanit Soc Sci Commun. 2020;6(112):60-69.

5. Shen C, Zhao X. How does income inequality affect economic growth at different income levels? Econ Res Ekon Istraž. 2022;36(1):864-884.

6. Agapito JJJ, Jala LLC, Cruz-Español R. Predictors of entrepreneurial attitude among administrators of selected community colleges and universities in Leyte. Ins into Reg Develop. 2022;4(4):36-51.

7. Su Z, Su S, Zhou Q. Government Trust in a Time of Crisis. China Rev. 2021;21(2):87-116.

8. Shahini E, Fedorchuk M, Hruban V, Fedorchuk V, Sadovoy O. Renewable energy opportunities in Ukraine in the context of blackouts. Int J Environ Stud. 2024;81(1):125–133.

9. Blikhar VS, Vinichuk MV, Ryzhkova AA. Institutional Foundations of de-Shadowing the Economy of Ukraine in the National Financial Security System. Social and Legal Studios. 2022;5(2):68–76. http://doi.org/10.32518/2617-4162-2022-5-2-68-76

10. Vargas MHF, Restrepo DR. The instruments of public policy. A transdisciplinary look. Adm Noteb. 2019;35(63):101-113.

11. Bransah W. The Role of Public Administration in the Modern Democratic State and Socialist Goals. Sch J Arts Humanit. 2020;2(3):14-22.

12. Chen Y, Guiping L, Gao W. Is pension insurance a barrier to entrepreneurship? New evidence from China. Econ Res Ekon Istraž. 2022;36(3):2155207.

13. Curi-Quinto K, Sanchez A, Lago-Berrocal N, Penny ME, Murray C, Nunes R, Favara M, Wijeyesekera A, Lovegrove JA, Soto-Caceres V, Vimaleswara KS. Role of Government Financial Support and Vulnerability Characteristics Associated with Food Insecurity during the COVID-19 Pandemic among Young Peruvians. Nutrients. 2021;13:3546.

14. Popovych V, Popovych Ya. The potential of public administration in social work in military conditions in Ukraine. Soc Work Edu. [Internet] 2022 [cited: 21/02/2023]; 9(3):370-382. Available in: http://dspace.tnpu.edu.ua/bitstream/123456789/27171/1/Vasyl%20Popovych%2C%20Yana%20Popovych.pdf

15. Law of Ukraine No. 1533-III “On mandatory state social unemployment insurance”; 2000. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1533-14#Text.

16. Law of Ukraine No. 1788-XII “On pension provision”; 1991. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1788-12?lang=en#Text.

17. Law of Ukraine No. 2671-VIII “On Social Services”; 2019. https://zakon2.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2671-19#Text.

18. Law of Ukraine No. 794-VII “On the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine”; 2014. https://zakon2.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/794-18#Text.

19. Budget Code of Ukraine; 2010. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2456-17#Text.

20. The World Bank. Risk of Global Recession in 2023 Rises Amid Simultaneous Rate Hikes; 2022. http://surl.li/ecjrt.

21. Katimahar R, Bahari Z, Ismail NA. Cost of Living and Standard of Living Nexus: The Determinants of Cost of Living. J Econ Malays. 2020;54(3):1-14.

22. Zvarych IT, Zvarych OI, Khoma VB. Management of socio-economic development of the region. Ivano-Frankivsk: PP Suprun VP; 2019.

23. Dunayev I, Kuchma M, Byelova L, Jatkiewicz P, Bilichenko O, Poberezhets H. Wartime destruction: regional assessment of damage to Ukraine’s infrastructure. Int J Environ Stud. 2024;81(1):8–17.

24. Sych T, Volodavchyk V, Vasynova N, Ivanov Y, Saienko O. The role of managerial competencies in fostering collaboration between higher education institutions and local communities. Sci Her Uzhh Univ Ser Phys. 2024;55:417–427.

25. Obolenskyj OJu, Borysevych SO, Konyk SM. Public Administration. Kyiv: NASM; 2011.

26. Omurzakova A, Shalbolova U, Mukhanova G. Risk assessment of social public-private partnership projects. Publ Policy Adm. 2022;21(2):140–150.

27. Hanovs D, Volkov V. Chapter 5 Types of Social Memory and the Subordination of Identities of Ethnic Minorities in Latvia. Val Inq Book Ser. 2021;359:105–128.

28. Karimli MOK, Baghirov HSO. Administrative Management Theory at High Educational Institutions and Its Following Stages. Int J Manag. 2021;11(10):133-138.

29. Doskeyeva GZ, Omarkhan DN, Konopyanova GA, Bordiyanu IV, Bekova RZ. Government funding for higher education: Foreign and Kazakhstan experience. Life Sci J. 2014;11(6):174–178.

30. Diegtiar OA, Kravchenko TA, Yevmieshkina OL, Sych TV, Linetska YM. Optimisation of information and communication systems of local government. Elect Gov. 2023;19(6):734–746.

31. Latham A, Layton J. Social infrastructure: why it matters and how urban geographers might study it. Urban Geogr. 2022;43(5):659-668.

32. Gabdrakhmanov N, Rubtsov VA. The Objects of Social Infrastructure in the Social Image of the Region Shaping. Procedia. Soc Behav Sci. 2014;140(2014):419-421.

33. Xhafka E, Teta J, Philippov DI, Kostyrin EV, Leelang S, Nikolaeva IV, Maramygin MS, Ruban-Lazareva NV, Muda I, Dudnik OV. Private Health Insurance in the Post-Pandemic Era: Spatial Econometric Market Development Analysis. Emerg Sci J. 2023;7(6):2080–2096.

34. Kolosovska I. Determining factors of the formation of the social concept of public administration. Democratic Governance. 2023;16(1):108-117. https://doi.org/10.23939/dg2023.01.108

35. Karamyshev DV. Global development index as indicator of global governance: Integrated assessment of OECD member countries development. Public Policy Adm. 2019;18(4):377–394. https://doi.org/10.13165/VPA-19-18-4-01

36. Diegtiar OA, Kravchenko TA, Yevmieshkina OL, Sych TV, Linetska YM. Innovative foundations for optimizing the information and communication system of local government. Publ Policy Adm. 2022;21(5):606–617.

37. Wright BE. The Science of Public Administration: Problems, Presumptions, Progress, and Possibilities. Public Adm Rev. 2015;75(6):795-805.

38. Shynkar T, Levchenko T. Manipulative technologies in terms of information security. Society. Document. Communication. 2023;8(2):270-286. https://doi.org/10.31470/2518-7600-2023-19-270-286

39. Hysi A, Avdulaj J, Shahini E, Goga I, Shahini E. Role of legal regulation in the establishment and development of the public administration system with local self-government aspects. Social and Legal Studios. 2024;7(1):27–36. https://doi.org/10.32518/sals1.2024.27

40. Lloyd R, Aho W. The Four Functions of Management - An essential guide to Management Principles. Kansas: Digital Pressbooks; 2020.

41. Amaglobeli D, Chai H, Dabla-Norris E, Dybczak K, Soto M, Tieman AF. The Future of Saving: The Role of Pension System Design in an Aging World. Staff Discuss Notes. 2019;19(1):1-47.

42. Kipane A, Vilks A, Krivinch A. Forecasts of Long-term Progress in the Socio-cultural Sphere in the Context of Combating Economic Crime. Pak J Crim. 2023;15(4):49–67.

43. Zhu J, Li G, Wan M, Li S, Sun L, Li J, Wang X. Survey Study of the Cultural Integration of International Students in East China under Ecosystem Theory. Sustainability. 2022;14(21):14485.

44. Pasichnyk V. Theoretical foundations of public administration in the sphere of formation of national identity. Democratic Governance. 2023;16(1):24-36. https://doi.org/10.23939/dg2023.01.024

45. Kotsur L. Formation of national pride is a necessary component of Ukrainian statehood. Society. Document. Communication. 2023;8(1):182-198. https://doi.org/10.31470/2518-7600-2023-18-182-198

46. Osievska Yu. Cultural heritage as a driver of social-cultural development on the modern stage: regional model effectiveness. Culture and Contemporaneity. 2022;1:99–105. https://doi.org/10.32461/2226-0285.1.2022.262578

47. Nimani A. European orientation towards the preservation of cultural heritage in the light of historical losses: Institutional and legal issues. European Chronicle. 2023;8(3):5-15. https://doi.org/10.59430/euch/3.2023.05

48. Khromov AV, Gadzalo I, Abroskin VV, Zavalnyi MV. Perspectives of public administration’s development: International experience. Amazon Investig. 2021;10(44):270-277.

49. Barrafrem K, Tinghog G, Vastfjall D. Trust in the government increases financial well-being and general well-being during COVID-19. J Behav Exp Finance. 2021;31:100514.

50. Opitasari, Yaddarabullah, Sensuse DI. Employee welfare financing system with support vector machine and Naïve Bayes to Syariah banking. AIP Conf Proceed. 2023;2482:100005.

51. Goldman Sachs. Why the US Can Avoid a Recession in 2023; 2023. www.goldmansachs.com/insights/pages/why-the-us-can-avoid-recession-in-2023.html.

52. Latynin MA, Pastukh KV, Tarasenko DL, Shevchenko SO, Munko AYu. Public Administration in the Economic Sphere of Ukraine: Strategic Approach. Appl Econ. [Internet] 2021 [cited: 21/02/2023];39(5):1-9. Available in: https://ojs.ual.es/ojs/index.php/eea/article/view/4967

Downloads

Published

2024-09-01

How to Cite

1.
Zvarych I, Zvarych O. Principles of public administration in the modern social sphere of Ukraine. Salud, Ciencia y Tecnología - Serie de Conferencias [Internet]. 2024 Sep. 1 [cited 2024 Dec. 2];3:.767. Available from: https://conferencias.ageditor.ar/index.php/sctconf/article/view/767