Semiotic field of directing at the beginning of the XXI century

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56294/sctconf20241009

Keywords:

Sign System, Cinematography, Symbols, Art, Interpretation

Abstract

We live in a time of amazing and astounding achievements in scientific and artistic thought. More and more new technologies are being developed in various fields, including information. Today it has become a common occurrence, and no one is surprised by the breadth and variety of forms of information transmission, the main tool of which are nothing but signs. We often perceive the meaning of signs as directly as we see images, hear sounds, smells, etc., in science this is called semiotics – a theory that explores the system of signs. The purpose of the study was to study the application of the sign system in art, namely in the field of directing at the present stage. The leading method of research was structural-semiotic analysis, with the help of which modern cinema was analysed for the use of semiotic means in it. In the course of the research, it was found that semiotics is inextricably linked with art, since the creators of their works often use signs and hidden symbols in creativity, thus giving the recipient the opportunity to independently interpret what he saw or heard. The field of directing is also no exception, most of them are theatrical productions and cinematic works. In cinema, the system of signs has become widespread, and a set of certain symbols is a distinctive feature of some directors. The research contributes to the development of the problems of using sign systems in various fields of activity, which expresses its practical significance

References

1. De Luca Picione R. (2021). The dynamic nature of the human psyche and its three tenets: Normativity, liminality and ResistanceSemiotic advances in direction of modal articulation sensemaking. Human Aren. 4(2), 279-293.

2. Jing Y. (2021). Visual affect in films: A semiotic approach. Semiot. 2021(239), 99-124.

3. Wang Q, Zhang D. (2019). Branding city destinations: A comparative analysis of the multimodal discourse in Beijing and London publicity films. Chinese Semiot Stud. 15(3), 379-410.

4. Marcelli M. (2020). Double articulation in linguistics, semiotics, theory of arts and philosophy. Jazykoved Casop. 71(2), 157-166.

5. Gómez SR. (2019). An agential-narrative approach on art semiosis. Tech Art. 17(3), 281-295.

6. Pua P, Hiramoto M. (2020). White hot heroes: Semiotics of race and sexuality in Hollywood ninja films. Lang Commun. 72, 56-67.

7. Polidoro P. (2019). Image schemas in visual semiotics: Looking for an origin of plastic language. Cognit Semiot. 12(1), article number 20192006

8. Ammer SMEI. (2020). Content analysis of lighting and color in the embodiment of fear concept in horror movies: A semiotic approach. Info Sci Letter. 9(2), 135-142.

9. Yulianeta, Tami R. (2021). Social satire on higher education: A comparative structural semiotic study of the movies alangkah lucunya (negeri ini) and parasite. Indones J Appl Ling. 11(1), 245-253.

10. Yıldırım B, Öcal E, Şahin-Topalcengiz E. (2021). Stem in movies: Female preservice teachers’ perspectives on movie “hidden figures”. J Baltic Sci Educ. 20(5), 740-758.

11. Anusha VS, Balagopal G, Vinod L. (2019). Movie posters of Bollywood remakes: A semiotic analysis. Int J Innov Tech Explor Engineer. 8(7), 291-301.

12. Noad B, Barton G. (2020). Emotion resonance and divergence: A semiotic analysis of music and sound in “The lost thing” an animated short film and “Elizabeth” a film trailer. Social Semiot. 30(2), 206-224.

13. Surace B. (2019). The intentions of memory: Hypothesis for a semiotic teleology from das ghetto to a film unfinished. Lex. 29-30, 113-130.

14. Alvarado O, Abeele VV, Geerts D, Verbert K. (2019). I really Don’t know what ‘Thumbs up’ means: Algorithmic experience in movie recommender algorithms. Lect Note Comp Sci (includ subser Lect Note Artific Intell Lect Note Bioinfo). 11748 LNCS, 521-541.

15. Santangelo A. (2021). Symbolic faces: Towards a socio-semiotic theory of the face. Lex. 2021(37-38), 503-520.

16. Fourati M, Jedidi A, Gargouri F. (2019). A combination between textual and visual modalities for knowledge extraction of movie documents. IC3K 2019 – Proceed 11th Int Joint Conf Knowl Discov, Knowl Engineer Knowl Manag. 2, 203-214.

17. Lotman J. (1976). Semiotics of Cinema. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

18. Lotman J. (2005). On the semiosphere. Sign Syst Stud. 33(1), 205–229.

19. McCardy A, Matusitz J. (2021). Power in hidden figures: A critical discourse analysis. Int J Media Cult Polit. 17(1), 3-17.

20. Malícková M, Malícek J. (2020). Theatricality of film language in baz luhrmann's films. Slovens Divad. 68(3), 209-228.

Downloads

Published

2024-06-28

How to Cite

1.
Krypchuk M, Nabokov R, Rozhkovska V, Chepura K, Sukhomlyn H. Semiotic field of directing at the beginning of the XXI century. Salud, Ciencia y Tecnología - Serie de Conferencias [Internet]. 2024 Jun. 28 [cited 2024 Nov. 21];3:1009. Available from: https://conferencias.ageditor.ar/index.php/sctconf/article/view/812