Pedagogical strategies for the development of research skills in higher education
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56294/sctconf20241003Keywords:
Research Skills, Curriculum Integration, Project-Based Learning, Mentoring and TutoringAbstract
Research skills are fundamental in higher education for various reasons. They develop critical skills that are essential for academic and professional success. This article presents a literature review that analyzes the main strategies used to promote the development of research skills in higher education. Through this review, three key findings were identified: the integration of research into the curriculum, the approach of Project-Based Learning (PBL), and the importance of mentoring and tutoring. Regarding the integration of research into the curriculum, it was found that this strategy is crucial for enriching students' theoretical learning. By providing them with the opportunity to develop research skills and participate in relevant projects, students are prepared to become competent and independent researchers. Project-Based Learning (PBL) was also highlighted as an effective strategy for the development of research skills. Through this approach, students actively engage in practical and challenging projects that allow them to apply their knowledge in real contexts. Finally, mentoring and tutoring were identified as essential strategies for the development of research skills in higher education. These practices provide individualized support and guidance to students, strengthening their confidence, motivation, and academic development. These strategies contribute to the enhancement of research skills, critical and creative thinking, and the preparation of students to face the challenges of the academic and professional world
References
1. Pérez Gamboa AJ, García Acevedo Y, García Batán J. Proyecto de vida y proceso formativo universitario: un estudio exploratorio en la Universidad de Camagüey. Trasnsformación. 2019;15(3):280-296. http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2077-29552019000300280
2. Cardeño-Portela N, Cardeño-Portela EJ, Bonilla-Blanchar E. Las TIC y la transformación académica en las universidades. Región Científica. 2023;2(2):202370. https://doi.org/10.58763/rc202370
3. Castillo-Martínez I, Ramírez-Montoya M. Research Competencies to Develop Academic Reading and Writing: A Systematic Literature Review. Frontiers in Education. 2021;5. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2020.576961
4. Ledesma F, Malave-González BE. Patrones de comunicación científica sobre E-commerce: un estudio bibliométrico en la base de datos Scopus. Región Científica. 2022;1(1):202214. https://doi.org/10.58763/rc202214
5. Whitton J, Parr G, Choate J. Developing the education research capability of education-focused academics: building skills, identities and communities. Higher Education Research & Development. 2021;41:2122-2136. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2021.1946016
6. López-Gónzalez YY. Competencia digital del profesorado para las habilidades TIC en el siglo XXI: una evaluación de su desarrollo. Región Científica. 2023;2(2):2023119. https://doi.org/10.58763/rc2023119
7. Buss R. Exploring the development of students’ identities as educational leaders and educational researchers in a professional practice doctoral program. Studies in Higher Education. 2020;47:1069-1083. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2020.1836484
8. Noroña González Y, Colala Troya AL, Peñate Hernández JI. La orientación para la proyección individual y social en la educación de jóvenes y adultos: un estudio mixto sobre los proyectos de vida. Región Científica. 2023;2(2):202389. https://doi.org/10.58763/rc202389
9. Brew A, Saunders C. Making sense of research-based learning in teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education. 2020;87:102935. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2019.102935
10. García-Sánchez P, Diaz-Diaz N, Saá-Pérez P. Social capital and knowledge sharing in academic research teams. International Review of Administrative Sciences. 2019;85:191-207. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852316689140
11. Eslava-Zapata R, Mogollón Calderón OZ, Chacón Guerrero E. Socialización organizacional en las universidades: estudio empírico. Región Científica. 2023;2(2):202369. https://doi.org/10.58763/rc202369
12. Monzón-Pinglo LA, Davila-Cisneros JD, Rodríguez-Torres E, Pérez-Gamboa AJ. La resiliencia en el contexto universitario, un estudio mixto exploratorio. Pensamiento Americano. 2023;16(31):1-15. https://doi.org/10.21803/penamer.16.31.636
13. López Rodríguez del Rey MM, Inguanzo Ardila AM, Guerra Domínguez E. La Orientación Educativa. Desafíos teóricos y prácticos. Región Científica. 2024;3(1):2024245. https://doi.org/10.58763/rc2024245
14. Gómez Cano CA. Ingreso, permanencia y estrategias para el fomento de los Semilleros de Investigación en una IES de Colombia. Región Científica. 2022;1(1):20226. https://doi.org/10.58763/rc20226
15. Gonzales-Tito YM, Quintanilla-López L, Pérez-Gamboa AJ. Metaverse and education: a complex space for the next educational revolution. Metaverse Basic and Applied Research. 2023;2:56. https://doi.org/10.56294/mr202356
16. Priego-Morales RA. El liderazgo directivo en la Nueva Escuela Mexicana y la revalorización docente desde el reconocimiento del talento humano: una revisión de alcance. Región Científica. 2024;3(1):2024197. https://doi.org/10.58763/rc2024197
17. Pérez-Gamboa AJ, Gómez-Cano C, Sánchez-Castillo V. Decision making in university contexts based on knowledge management systems. Data & Metadata. 2022;2:92. https://doi.org/10.56294/dm202292
18. Moreira AdJ, Reis Fonseca RM. La inserción de los movimientos sociales en la protección del medio ambiente: cuerpos y aprendizajes en el Recôncavo da Bahia. Región Científica. 2024;3(1):2024208. https://doi.org/10.58763/rc2024208
19. Pérez-Gamboa AJ, Rodríguez-Torres E, Camejo-Pérez Y. Fundamentos de la atención psicopedagógica para la configuración del proyecto de vida en estudiantes universitarios. Educación y Sociedad. 2023;21(2):67-89. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7979972
20. Kammerer-David MI, Murgas-Téllez B. La innovación tecnológica desde un enfoque de dinámica de sistemas. Región Científica. 2024;3(1):2024217. https://doi.org/10.58763/rc2024217
21. Creswell JW. Research Design. Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Method Approaches. 4th ed. SAGE; 2019.
22. Casasempere-Satorres A, Vercher-Ferrándiz ML. Bibliographic documentary analysis. Getting the most out of the literature review in qualitative research. New Trends in Qualitative Research. 2020;4:247-257. https://doi.org/10.36367/ntqr.4.2020.247-257.
23. Evans C, Howson C, Forsythe A, Edwards C. What constitutes high quality higher education pedagogical research? Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. 2020;46:525-546. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2020.1790500
24. Strachan S, Marshall S, Murray P, Coyle E, Sonnenberg-Klein J. Using Vertically Integrated Projects to embed research-based education for sustainable development in undergraduate curricula. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education. 2019;20(8):1313-1328. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSHE-10-2018-0198
25. Mota-Valtierra G, Rodríguez-Reséndiz J, Herrera-Ruiz G. Constructivism-Based Methodology for Teaching Artificial Intelligence Topics Focused on Sustainable Development. Sustainability. 2019;11(17):4642. https://doi.org/10.3390/SU11174642
26. Yu K, Wu P, Fan S. Structural Relationships among High School Students’ Scientific Knowledge, Critical Thinking, Engineering Design Process, and Design Product. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education. 2020;18:1001-1022. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10763-019-10007-2
27. Lund T, Clyne R. Case Study: Implementation and evaluation of a team-based authentic research project module for large cohorts. Essays in biochemistry. 2022;66(1):45-51. https://doi.org/10.1042/EBC20210053
28. Prosekov A, Morozova I, Filatova E. A Case Study of Developing Research Competency in University Students. European Journal of Contemporary Education. 2020;9(3):592-602. https://doi.org/10.13187/ejced.2020.3.592
29. Oberbichler S, Boros E, Doucet A, Marjanen J, Pfanzelter E, Rautiainen J, Toivonen H, Tolonen M. Integrated interdisciplinary workflows for research on historical newspapers: Perspectives from humanities scholars, computer scientists, and librarians. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 2021;73:225-239. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24565
30. Okamura K. Interdisciplinarity revisited: evidence for research impact and dynamism. Palgrave Communications. 2020;5:1-9. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-019-0352-4
31. Paterson C, Paterson N, Jackson W, Work F. What are students' needs and preferences for academic feedback in higher education? A systematic review. Nurse education today. 2019;85:104236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2019.104236
32. Yang L, Chiu M, Yan Z. The power of teacher feedback in affecting student learning and achievement: insights from students’ perspective. Educational Psychology. 2021;41:821-824. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2021.1964855
33. Armstrong R, Ludlow A. What’s so good about participation? Politics, ethics and love in Learning Together. Methodological Innovations. 2020;13(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/2059799120927339
34. Coelho M, Menezes I. Universitas: how do students perceive university social responsibility in three European higher education institutions? International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education. 2021;23(4):767-782. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSHE-04-2021-0130
35. Knoepke C, Ingle M, Matlock D, Brownson R, Glasgow R. Dissemination and stakeholder engagement practices among dissemination & implementation scientists: Results from an online survey. PLoS ONE. 2019;14. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0216971
36. Toews I, Nyirenda J, Stadelmaier J, Schwarzer G, Noyes J, Booth A, Lewin S, Meerpohl J. Subsequent full publication of qualitative studies presented at United Kingdom Royal College of Nursing Research Conference 2015 and 2016: A follow-up study. Research Synthesis Methods. 2021;13:434-446. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1534
37. Crespí P, García-Ramos J, Queiruga-Dios M. Project-Based Learning (PBL) and Its Impact on the Development of Interpersonal Competences in Higher Education. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research. 2022;11(2):259-276. https://doi.org/10.7821/naer.2022.7.993
38. Guo P, Saab N, Post L, Admiraal W. A review of project-based learning in higher education: Student outcomes and measures. International Journal of Educational Research. 2020;102:101586. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2020.101586
39. Hwang C, Liu H, Salusso C. Social responsibility initiative: examining the influence of a collaborative service learning project on student learning. International Journal of Fashion Design, Technology and Education. 2019;12:356-363. https://doi.org/10.1080/17543266.2019.1652854
40. Mora H, Pont M, Guilló A, Pertegal-Felices M. A collaborative working model for enhancing the learning process of science & engineering students. Computer Human Behavior. 2020;103:140-150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.09.008
41. Brassler M, Schultze M. Students’ Innovation in Education for Sustainable Development—A Longitudinal Study on Interdisciplinary vs. Monodisciplinary Learning. Sustainability. 2021;13(3):1322. https://doi.org/10.3390/SU13031322
42. Hart J. Interdisciplinary project-based learning as a means of developing employability skills in undergraduate science degree programs. Journal of Teaching and Learning for Graduate Employability. 2019;10(2):50-66. https://doi.org/10.21153/JTLGE2019VOL10NO2ART827
43. Setyarini T, Mustaji M, Jannah M. The Effect of Project-Based Learning Assisted PANGTUS on Creative Thinking Ability in Higher Education. Int. J. Emerg. Technol. Learn. 2020;15:245-251. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v15i11.12717
44. Sumarni W, Kadarwati S. Ethno-Stem Project-Based Learning: Its Impact to Critical and Creative Thinking Skills. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia. 2020;9:11-21. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v9i1.21754
45. Namin A, Ketron S, Kaltcheva V, Winsor R. Improving Student Presentation Skills Using Asynchronous Video-Based Projects. Journal of Management Education. 2021;45:987-1010. https://doi.org/10.1177/1052562920978805
46. Owens A, Hite R. Enhancing student communication competencies in STEM using virtual global collaboration project based learning. Research in Science & Technological Education. 2020;40:76-102. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2020.1778663
47. Tinoco-Giraldo, H., Sánchez, E., & García-Peñalvo, F. E-Mentoring in Higher Education: A Structured Literature Review and Implications for Future Research. Sustainability. 2020;12(11):4344. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12114344
48. Nasri, N., Nasri, N., & Talib, M. Understanding university professors' best mentoring practices in undergraduate research. Innovations in Education and Teaching International. 2023;60:112-123. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2021.1988677
49. Al-Thani, N., Santhosh, M., Bhadra, J., & Ahmad, Z. The Prominent Roles of Undergraduate Mentors in an Online Near-Peer Mentoring Model. Sustainability. 2023;15(4):3020. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15043020
50. Subotnik, R., Olszewski-Kubilius, P., Khalid, M., & Finster, H. A developmental view of mentoring talented students in academic and nonacademic domains. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 2019;1483(1):199-207. https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.14286
51. Overman, A. Strategies for Group-Level Mentoring of Undergraduates: Creating a Laboratory Environment That Supports Publications and Funding. Frontiers in Psychology. 2019;10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00323
52. Aldridge, J., Rijken, P., & Fraser, B. Improving learning environments through whole-school collaborative action research. Learning Environments Research. 2020;24:183-205. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-020-09318-x
53. Williamson, G., Plowright, H., Kane, A., Bunce, J., Clarke, D., & Jamison, C. Collaborative learning in practice: A systematic review and narrative synthesis of the research evidence in nurse education. Nurse education in practice. 2020;43:102706. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2020.102706
54. Chen, F. Collaborative Grouping and Interactive Relationship Construction of College Students Based on Group Preference. Int. J. Emerg. Technol. Learn. 2023;18:160-175. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v18i03.38051
55. Little, C. Undergraduate research as a student engagement springboard: Exploring the longer-term reported benefits of participation in a research conference. Educational Research. 2020;62:229-245. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131881.2020.1747360
56. Zhang, B., Kim, S., Xiao, Y., Damman, C., Kelly, K., Fitzpatrick, D., Anderson, C., Reynoldson, M., Bray, B., Stewart, A., Daoud, S., & Remsberg, C. A student initiative to implement peer-led study groups for a pharmacogenomics course: Evaluation of student performance and perceptions. Currents in pharmacy teaching & learning. 2020;12(5):549-557. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cptl.2020.01.013
57. Nokkala, T., Aarnikoivu, M., & Kiili, J. Multidisciplinary Peer-Mentoring Groups Supporting Knowledge Sharing in Doctoral Education. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research. 2021;66:865-878. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2021.1939142
58. Ghiso, M., Campano, G., Schwab, E., Asaah, D., & Rusoja, A. Mentoring in Research-Practice Partnerships: Toward Democratizing Expertise. AERA Open. 2019;5(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858419879448
59. Toros, K. Undergraduate students' perception of their own strengths and weaknesses as potential social workers. Journal of Social Work Practice. 2019;33:81-93. https://doi.org/10.1080/02650533.2017.1419465
60. Chernikova O, Heitzmann N, Fink M, Timothy V, Seidel T, Fischer F. Facilitating Diagnostic Competences in Higher Education—a Meta-Analysis in Medical and Teacher Education. Educational Psychology Review. 2019;32:157-196. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10648-019-09492-2
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Denise Ilcen Contreras Zapata, Rosa Victoria González Zambrano, Pedro Manuel Roca Piloso (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The article is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Unless otherwise stated, associated published material is distributed under the same licence.
