Project management based on ISO 21500, to improve productivity in the industry
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56294/sctconf2024928Keywords:
Project Management, Productivity, Efficiency, Effectiveness, ISO 21500 StandardAbstract
The ISO 21500 standard provides guidance on project management principles and procedures with the objective of improving project management performance. establishing principles and guidelines to carry out a project effectively and successfully, using a methodology in the process to analyze productivity in its three dimensions; efficiency, effectiveness and effectiveness of the industrial company, the results regarding Project Management indicate that 65,90 % have managed to apply the standards of the norm, 22,7 % are in process and 11,4 % are in the beginning, Regarding Productivity, 59,1 % has been achieved, 31,8 % in process and 9,10 % in the beginning. The results indicate that the majority have managed to achieve a satisfactory level of productivity. It can be fundamentally shown that there is an improvement in productivity when carrying out good project management. Likewise, indicate that there is a direct and highly significant relationship between Project Management and productivity, according to the Rho Spearman Test statistic (0,956) and the Significance =0,000 < 0,05 between both variables. The ISO 21500 standard is recognized globally and uses a common language that is easy to understand, transcending country borders
References
1. ISO 21500, Guía sobre gestión de proyectos, es un estándar internacional desarrollado por la Organización (2012)
2. Cruelles, J. (2013). Productividad e Incentivos: Como hacer que los tiempos de fabricación se cumplan (Primera ed.). México D.F.: Alfaomega Grupo editor S.A.
3. Oficina de Normas Internacionales (2012). Norma ISO 21500:2012. Orientación en Gestión de Proyectos. Ginebra: ISO.
4. M. Varas Parra, “Examinando los procesos de la Dirección de proyectos,” Proceedings of the IX Congreso de Ingeniería de Organización, p. 9, 2005.
5. P. Vásquez, “Metodologías de Gestión de Proyectos, alcance, impacto y tendencias,” p. 98,2007.
6. M. Montes Guerra, F. Gimena Ramos, and H. M. Diez Silva, “Explorando los cuerpos de conocimiento de la gestión de proyectos y su orientación hacia el seguimiento y control,” XV Congr. Int. Ing. Proy. Huesca, pp. 75–97, 2011.
7. N. Z. Etxebarria, J. Igartua Lopez & N. Errasti Lozares, “Análisis de la Relación Existente entre los Estándares de Gestión de Proyectos y los Factores Críticos para su Éxito, Memorias del XVI Congreso de Ingeniería de Organización, 2012, pp. 943–950.
8. Project Management Institute PMI, “Guía de los FUNDAMENTOS PARA LA DIRECCIÓN DE PROYECTOS,” 2017.
9. W. Belassi and O. I. Tukel, “A new framework for determining critical success/failure factors in projects,” Int. J. Proj. Manag., vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 141–151, 1996.
10. I. Álvarez García, “Introducción a la teoría de proyectos,” Planeación y Desarro. Proy. Soc. y Educ., pp. 49–65, 2006.
11. BSI, “ISO 21500:2012 Guidance on project management,” BSI Stand. Publ., 2012.
12. Aaltonen, K., y Kujala, J. (2010). A project lifecycle perspective on stakeholder influence strategies in global projects. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 26(4), 381-397.
13. Kerzner, H. (2003). Advanced Project Management: Best practices on implementation. John Wiley & Sons.
14. Müller, R., y Jugdev, K. (2012). Critical success factors in projects: Pinto, Slevin, and Prescott–the elucidation of project success. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 5(4), 757-775.
15. Butlin, J. (1989). Our common future. By World commission on environment and development. (London, Oxford University Press, 1987, pp. 383). John Wiley & Sons.
16. Gareis, R., Huemann, M., y Martinuzzi, R. (2013). Project Management and Sustainable Development Principles. Project Management Institute.
17. Silvius, G., Schipper, R., Planko, J., y Van den Brink, J. (2012). Sustainability in Project management. Gower Publishing, Ltd.
18. Silvius, A. J. G., y Tharp, J. (2013). Sustainability integration for effective project management. IGI-Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666- 4177-8
19. Prokopenko, J. (1987). La gestión de la productividad Manual práctico. Ginebra: OIT. RAE. (2010). Diccionario - Gestión Administrativa. Quito: Comercio.
20. Rodriguez, L., Nuñez, A., & Cequea, P. (2011). La productividad desde una perspectiva humana: Dimensiones y factores, Venezuela. Intangible Capital. Obtenido de https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=54921605013.
21. Kloppenborg, T. J., & Opfer, W. A. (2002). The current state of project management research: trends, interpretations, and predictions. Project Management Journal, 33(2), 5-18.
22. UNESCO. (2005). Hacia las Sociedades del Conocimiento. Carpeta Abierta. Publicado en 2005 por la Organización de las Naciones Unidas para la Educación, la Ciencia y la Cultura.
23. Jorgensen, T.; Wallace, S.W. (2000). Improving project cost estimation by taking into account managerial fl exibility. European Journal of Operational Research, vol 127, pp: 239-251.
24. Agarwal, N., & Rathod, U. (2006). Defining ‘success’ for software projects: an exploratory revelation. International Journal of Project Management, 24(4), 358-370.
25. ISO/IEC Guide 2:2004 (combination of definitions 3.2 & 3.2.1.1).
26. Barclay, C., & Osei-Bryson, K.-M. (2010). Project performance development framework: An approach for developing performance criteria & measures for information systems (IS) projects. International Journal of Production Economics, 124(1), 272-292.
27. Bayraktar, M. E., Hastak, M., Gokhale, S., & Safi, B. (2011). Decision Tool for Selecting the Optimal Techniques for Cost and Schedule Reduction in Capital Projects. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management 137(9), 11.
28. Bernroider, E. W. N., & Ivanov, M. (2011). IT project management control and the Control Objectives for IT and related Technology (CobiT) framework. International Journal of Project Management, 29(3), 325-336.
29. Behn, R. D. (2003). Why Measure Performance? Different Purposes Require Different Measures. Public Administration Review, Vol. 63(No. 5), 586-606.
30. Dey, P. K. (2000). Managing projects in fast track. A case of public sector organization in India. The International Journal of Public Sector Management, 13(7), 558-609.
31. Flapper, S. D. P., Fortuin, L., & Stoop, P. P. M. (1996). Towards consistent performance management systems. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 16(7), 27-37. ee
32. Yuan, J., Wang, C., Skibniewski, M. J., & Li, Q. (2011). Developing Key Performance Indicators for Public- Private Partnership. Projects: Questionnaire Survey and Analysis. Journal of Management in Engineering, Accepted October 31.
33. Van Der Westhuizen, D., & Fitzgerald, E. P. (2005). Defining and measuring project success. In D. Remenyi (Ed.), European Conference on IS Management, Leadership and Governance (pp. 157-163). Reading, United Kingdom: Academic Conferences Limited.
34. Luu, V. T., Kim, S.-Y., & Huynh, T.-A. (2008). Improving project management performance of large contractors using benchmarking approach. International Journal of Project Management, 26(7), 758-769.
35. Lauras, M., Marques, G., & Gourc, D. (2010). Towards a multi-dimensional project Performance Measurement System. Decision Support Systems, 48(2), 342-353.
36. International Organization for Standardization (ISO). (2012). ISO 21500:2012 -- Guidance on project management. Recuperado de https://www.iso.org/standard/50003.html
37. PMI. (2017). A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide) - Sixth Edition. Project Management Institute.
38. Agile Alliance. (s.f.). Agile Manifesto. Recuperado de https://agilemanifesto.org/ Highsmith, J. (2009). Agile Project Management: Creating Innovative Products. Addison-Wesley Professional.
39. Heagney, J. (2016). Fundamentals of Project Management. AMACOM./ Pinto, J. K., & Slevin, D. P. (2019). Project Management: Achieving Competitive Advantage. Pearson.
40. Ahire, S. L., Golhar, D. Y., & Waller, M. A. (1996). Development and validation of TQM implementation constructs. Decision Sciences, 27(1), 23-56. / Antony, J., & Banuelas, R. (2002). Key ingredients for the effective implementation of Six Sigma program. Measuring Business Excellence, 6(4), 20-27.
41. Gestión de proyectos basado en la norma ISO 21500, para mejorar la productividad. https://repositorio.unjfsc.edu.pe/handle/20.500.14067/8899.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Miguel Wilfredo Bernabé Custodio, Gina Ruby Gonzales Salazar , Ángel Hugo Campos Díaz , Flor de María Lioo Jordán , Viviana Inés Vellón Flores , Flor de María Garivay Torres de Salinas, Timoteo Solano Armas , Félix Gil Caro Soto (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The article is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Unless otherwise stated, associated published material is distributed under the same licence.
