Influence of reference groups of brand connectivity of consumers
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56294/sctconf2024909Keywords:
Reference Group, Brand Connectivity, Brand Performance, Emotional AttachmentAbstract
Purpose: the main aim of the study is to find the influence of reference groups on the factors of brand connectivity
Method: the study depends upon the primary data obtained through a well structures questionnaire. The researcher applied convenience sampling method to obtain 389 responses from all the 15 zones of Chennai city and applied confirmatory factor analysis, structural equation model, linear multiple regression analysis and one-way analysis of the variance.
Findings: it is found that the primary reference group comprises family members with intimate connection and close friends with a dominating type whereas the secondary reference group consist of office colleagues, professionals in the office and superiors and subordinates
Practical Implications: the present research is focusing on the predominant reference groups frequently influences the changing behaviour of consumers and their brand choice behaviour, the factors directly determine the existence of profound brand connectivity among the consumers and to know the empirical relationship between reference group influences on brand connectivity perception of consumers in the study area.
Originality/Value: the study focus on measuring the impact of reference group of customers in consolidating the brand connectivity between customers and brands on the basis of emotional attachment and brand performance and satisfaction
References
1. Chu SC, Huang SC. College-educated youths' attitudes toward global brands: Implications for global marketing strategies. Journal of International Consumer Marketing. 2010 Mar 19; 22(2): 129-145.
2. Escalas JE, Bettman JR. Self-brand connections: The role of reference groups and celebrity endorsers in the creation of brand meaning. In D. J. MacInnis, C. W. Park, & J. R. Priester (Eds.), Handbook of brand relationships. Armonk, NY US: M E Sharpe. 2009: 107-123.
3. Eszter T. The relative influence of parents and peers on young people’s consumer behaviour. InAustralian and New Zealand Marketing Academy (ANZMAC) Conference. 2007: 2930-2937.
4. Fernandes S, Londhe BR. Influence of social reference group on buying behavior, a comparative study of working and non working women in bangalore-A pilot study analysis. Indian Journal of Science and Technology. 2015 Mar 1; 8: 95-124.
5. Ferraro R, Kirmani A, Matherly T. Look at me! Look at me! Conspicuous brand usage, self-brand connection, and dilution. Journal of Marketing Research. 2013 Aug; 50(4): 477-488.
6. Greco AJ. Differences in susceptibility to reference group influence on brand decisions: Middle aged and elderly group participants. In Proceedings of the 1986 Academy of Marketing Science (AMS) Annual Conference, Cham: Springer International Publishing. 2014 Oct 14: 46-50.
7. Gupta N. Extent of susceptibility to interpersonal influence and price sensitivity among Indian youth: is there a relationship between these two constructs?. Young consumers. 2011 Nov 22; 12(4): 361-369.
8. Lawrence BS. Organizational reference groups: A missing perspective on social context. Organization Science. 2006 Feb; 17(1): 80-100.
9. Mehta SC, Lalwani AK, Ping L. Reference group influence and perceived risk in services among working women in Singapore: A replication and extension. Journal of International Consumer Marketing. 2002 Jan 1; 14(1): 43-65.
10. Park CW, MacInnis DJ, Priester J, Eisingerich AB, Iacobucci D. Brand attachment and brand attitude strength: Conceptual and empirical differentiation of two critical brand equity drivers. Journal of marketing. 2010 Nov; 74(6): 1-17.
11. Reed II A, Forehand MR, Puntoni S, Warlop L. Identity-based consumer behavior. International Journal of Research in Marketing. 2012 Dec 1; 29(4): 310-321.
12. Serralvo F, Sastre P, Joao B. Reference group Influence on Consumer Decision Making Process: A study in the Brazilian sports utilitarian vehicles segment. Journal of Academy of Business and Economics. 2010; 10(2): 157-161.
13. Shukla P. Impact of interpersonal influences, brand origin and brand image on luxury purchase intentions: Measuring inter functional interactions and a cross-national comparison. Journal of world business. 2011 Apr 1; 46(2): 242-252.
14. Thomson M, MacInnis DJ, Whan Park C. The ties that bind: Measuring the strength of consumers’ emotional attachments to brands. Journal of consumer psychology. 2005; 15(1): 77-91.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 N. Vimaladhevi , M. Thaiyalnayaki (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The article is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Unless otherwise stated, associated published material is distributed under the same licence.
