Dimensions of responsible tourism and quality of life
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56294/sctconf2024886Keywords:
Tourism, Quality of Life, Community Development, Tamilnadu, Well-BeingAbstract
Responsible tourism consists in undertaking such activities that enable achieving growth in a way that either does not destroy the existing environment and protects the culture, history, heritage, and achievements of local communities. Besides, the attainment of responsible tourism requires careful management of tourists’ and residents’ behaviors to prevent deleterious effects on the environment, sociocultural setting and visitor satisfaction. This paper is aimed to evolve the factors influencing Dimensions of Responsible tourism and to validate Quality of Life (QOL). The study is made with selected 3 Districts in Tamilnadu respectively Madurai District, Tanjore District and Kanniyakumari District. The respondents are the residents who are located in the three districts nearing tourism spots ,250 Questionnaires were distributed to the respondents and only 225 respondents returned the full filled questionnaire. Through IBM SPSS the validity construction is ensured through the Percentage analysis, Descriptive Analysis and Confirmatory factor analysis. Reliability is measured with the consistency of each item score. These tests are guaranteed by representative samples and Convenience sampling method is used to analyse the study. Tourism can have both positive and negative impacts on the QOL of local communities. In general, the domains of QOL that are perceived to be positively affected are the economy, employment opportunities, community pride, cultural exchange, and availability of facilities
References
1. Chang CL, McAleer M, Ramos V. A charter for sustainable tourism after COVID-19. Sustainability. 2020 May 1; 12(9): 3671. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12093671.
2. Chin WW, Peterson RA, Brown SP. Structural equation modeling in marketing: Some practical reminders. Journal of marketing theory and practice. 2008 Sep 1; 16(4): 287-298.
3. Cottrell SP, Cutumisu N. Sustainable tourism development strategy in WWF Pan Parks: Case of a Swedish and Romanian national park. Scandinavian Journal of Hospitality and Tourism. 2006 Aug 1; 6(2): 150-167.
4. Cottrell SP, Vaske JJ, Roemer JM. Resident satisfaction with sustainable tourism: The case of Frankenwald Nature Park, Germany. Tourism Management Perspectives. 2013 Oct 1; 8: 42-48.
5. Donyadide A. Ethics in tourism. European Journal of Social Sciences. 2010; 17(3): 426-433.
6. Farmaki A, Constanti P, Yiasemi I, Karis P. Responsible tourism in Cyprus: the rhetoric and the reality. Worldwide Hospitality and Tourism Themes. 2014 Feb 4; 6(1): 10-26.
7. Gao L, Bai X. A unified perspective on the factors influencing consumer acceptance of internet of things technology. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics. 2014 Apr 8; 26(2): 211-231.
8. Kusumawati A, Utomo HS, Suharyono S, Sunarti S. Effects of sustainability on WoM intention and revisit intention, with environmental awareness as a moderator. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal. 2019 Sep 30; 31(1): 273-288.
9. Maichum K, Parichatnon S, Peng KC. Application of the extended theory of planned behavior model to investigate purchase intention of green products among Thai consumers. Sustainability. 2016 Oct 23; 8(10): 1077. https://doi.org/10.3390/su8101077.
10. Wu X, Lai IK. The acceptance of augmented reality tour app for promoting film-induced tourism: the effect of celebrity involvement and personal innovativeness. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Technology. 2021 Aug 5; 12(3): 454-470.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 R.A. Dhilipan Rajha, G. Rajini (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The article is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Unless otherwise stated, associated published material is distributed under the same licence.
