Faculty perception on digital transformation in education sector during pandemic
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56294/sctconf2024884Keywords:
Remote Class, Technical Issues, Values, ResponsivenessAbstract
The Corona learnt a lot of lessons to humans and also introduced sophisticated digital world to complete all the duties digitally. Employees are integral to the process of digital transformation, which is a great asset for established organizations. This research advances our knowledge of how workers in the education industry interpret the digital transition. The complexity of organizational change the primary focus of this research is digital transformation. Despite their broad support for digital transformation, teachers' perspectives vary over time about a variety of particular problems encountered along the employee change journey, according to the research. Adopting a social exchange lens in digital transformation knowledge is crucial because it represents a significant structural shift that might lead to the failure of well-designed transformation processes. This is where the stress, human values, and technological values come in. Sharing and departmental cooperation are implications for the education and service sectors. Common emotional responses to change are fear, uncertainty, and worry. Teachers might not be able to articulate how they are feelings or they may not want to say it to leadership. Over the last 200 years, the workplace has changed constantly due to new technology and more globalisation. Additionally, since analytical and creative tasks are becoming more and more important, flexibility is required. Productivity in these professions is supported by the availability of quiet places and adaptable spatial designs given that workers in these positions often need quiet and concentration
References
1. Rof A, Bikfalvi A, Marquès P. Digital transformation for business model innovation in higher education: Overcoming the tensions. Sustainability. 2020 Jun 18; 12(12): 4980. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12124980
2. Kundu A, Dey KN. A contemporary study on the flourishing E-learning scenarios in India. International Journal of Creative Research Thoughts. 2018 Apr; 6(2): 384-390.
3. Blin F, Munro M. Why hasn’t technology disrupted academics’ teaching practices? Understanding resistance to change through the lens of activity theory. Computers & Education. 2008 Feb 1; 50(2): 475-490.
4. Bond M, Marín VI, Dolch C, Bedenlier S, Zawacki-Richter O. Digital transformation in German higher education: student and teacher perceptions and usage of digital media. International journal of educational technology in higher education. 2018 Dec; 15(1): 1-20.
5. Dede C. Emerging technologies, ubiquitous learning, and educational transformation. InTowards Ubiquitous Learning: 6th European Conference of Technology Enhanced Learning, EC-TEL 2011, Palermo, Italy, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Proceedings Sep 2011: 1-8.
6. Fornell C, Larcker DF. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of marketing research. 1981 Feb; 18(1): 39-50.
7. Hinings B, Gegenhuber T, Greenwood R. Digital innovation and transformation: An institutional perspective. Information and organization. 2018 Mar 1; 28(1): 52-61.
8. Iivari N, Molin-Juustila T, Kinnula M. The future digital innovators: empowering the young generation with digital fabrication and making. (2016).
9. Jensen L, Price L, Roxå T. Seeing through the eyes of a teacher: differences in perceptions of HE teaching in face-to-face and digital contexts. Studies in Higher Education. 2020 Jun 2; 45(6): 1149-1159.
10. He T, Li S. A comparative study of digital informal learning: The effects of digital competence and technology expectancy. British Journal of Educational Technology. 2019 Jul; 50(4): 1744-1758.
11. Nunnally JC, Bernstein IH. Psychometric theory, 3. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill. 1994.
12. Balyer A, Öz Ö. Academicians' Views on Digital Transformation in Education. International Online Journal of Education and Teaching. 2018; 5(4): 809-830.
13. Papagiannidis S, Harris J, Morton D. WHO led the digital transformation of your company? A reflection of IT related challenges during the pandemic. International journal of information management. 2020 Dec 1; 55: 102166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102166
14. Agarwal R, Gao G, DesRoches C, Jha AK. Research commentary—The digital transformation of healthcare: Current status and the road ahead. Information systems research. 2010 Dec; 21(4): 796-809.
15. Raja R, Nagasubramani PC. Impact of modern technology in education. Journal of Applied and Advanced Research. 2018 May 10; 3(1): 33-35.
16. Roy S. e-learning Scope and Trend in India. (2020). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/338913710_elearning_Scope_and_Trend_in_India
17. Vial G. Understanding digital transformation: A review and a research agenda. Managing digital transformation. 2021 May 26: 13-66.
18. Kapur R. Significance of digital technology. International Journal of Transformations in Business Management. 2018; 8(2): 20-33.
19. Pulkit M Singh A. Teachers’ Voices on the Impact of COVID-19 on School Education: Are Ed-Tech Companies Really the Panacea? Contemporary Education Dialogue. 2020; 18: 58–89.
20. Joshi A, Vinay M, Bhaskar P. Impact of coronavirus pandemic on the Indian education sector: perspectives of teachers on online teaching and assessments. Interactive technology and smart education. 2021 Sep 22; 18(2): 205-226.
21. Raja R. Effect of pandemic based online education on teaching and learning system. International Journal of Educational Development. 2018.
22. Zawacki-Richter O, Müskens W, Krause U, Alturki U, Aldraiweesh A. Student media usage patterns and non-traditional learning in higher education. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning. 2015 Apr; 16(2): 136-170.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 P. Sujendra Swami , T. Hareesh Kumar , Y. Jahangir (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The article is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Unless otherwise stated, associated published material is distributed under the same licence.
