An Empirical analysis of the effect of user behavior based on marketing sustainable fashion
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56294/sctconf2024883Keywords:
User Behavior, Fashion Industry, Loyalty Intention, Hypothesis, Purchase Intention, Customer Experience, Participate Intention, Marketing Activity, Sustainable Performance, Relationship QualityAbstract
User behavior has had a significant impact on the fashion sector's marketing strategy. Environmental knowledge, market attitude, social conditioning, and value perception worth all had a favorable influence on the buying, but market attitude had the significant impacts. This study used a decision-making model that encompassed cognition, emotive, and behavior intentions to examine customer behavior of product consumer engagement. On the questionnaires, the demographic and hypothesis measurement items were separated. Only 370 of the 500 persons who applied have any previous experience shopping in the fashion industry. The major factors used to measure hypotheses are Promotional Strategy, Customer Satisfaction, Relationship Satisfaction, Purchase Intent, Loyalty Intention, and Participation Intention. All elements were evaluated using a 5-point Likert scale to measure from 1 – 5. This study also suggests that in order to achieve marketing goals and achieve long-term effectiveness for businesses, marketing content should be followed by Marketing Activity (MA) and Customer Experience (CE)
References
1. Zhang B, Zhang Y, Zhou P. Consumer attitude towards sustainability of fast fashion products in the UK. Sustainability. 2021 Feb 4; 13(4): 1646. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13041646
2. Harman R. Loved Garments: Observed Reasons for Consumers Using and Holding Onto Garments. Art & Design 21: Fashion. 2021 Nov 21: 9.
3. McNeill L, Moore R. Sustainable fashion consumption and the fast fashion conundrum: fashionable consumers and attitudes to sustainability in clothing choice. International journal of consumer studies. 2015 May; 39(3): 212-222.
4. Čiarnienė R, Vienažindienė M. Management of contemporary fashion industry: characteristics and challenges. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2014 Nov 26; 156: 63-68.
5. Shen B, Zheng JH, Chow PS, Chow KY. Perception of fashion sustainability in online community. The Journal of the textile institute. 2014 Sep 2; 105(9): 971-979.
6. Thorisdottir TS, Johannsdottir L. Sustainability within fashion business models: A systematic literature review. Sustainability. 2019 Apr 13; 11(8): 2233. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11082233
7. Yang S, Song Y, Tong S. Sustainable retailing in the fashion industry: A systematic literature review. Sustainability. 2017 Jul 19; 9(7): 1266. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9071266.
8. Brewer MK. Slow fashion in a fast fashion world: Promoting sustainability and responsibility. Laws. 2019 Oct 9; 8(4): 24. https://doi.org/10.3390/laws8040024.
9. MacArthur E. A new textiles economy: redesigning fashion’s future. Ellen MacArthur Foundation. 2017: 1-50.
10. Agenda GF. The Boston Consulting Group. Pulse of the fashion industry report 2017. Retrieved 19 Sept, 2019.
11. Beltrami M, Kim D, Rölkens F. The state of fashion 2019.
12. Choi TM. Impacts of retailer’s risk averse behaviors on quick response fashion supply chain systems. Annals of Operations Research. 2018 Sep; 268: 239-257.
13. Camargo LR, Pereira SC, Scarpin MR. Fast and ultra-fast fashion supply chain management: an exploratory research. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management. 2020 Jun 8; 48(6): 537-553.
14. Choi TM. Launching the right new product among multiple product candidates in fashion: Optimal choice and coordination with risk consideration. International Journal of Production Economics. 2018 Aug 1; 202: 162-171.
15. Macchion L, Danese P, Vinelli A. Redefining supply network strategies to face changing environments. A study from the fashion and luxury industry. Operations management research. 2015 Jun; 8(1): 15-31.
16. Puspita H, Chae H. An explorative study and comparison between companies’ and customers’ perspectives in the sustainable fashion industry. Journal of Global Fashion Marketing. 2021 Apr 3; 12(2): 133-145.
17. Mukherjee S. Environmental and social impact of fashion: Towards an eco-friendly, ethical fashion. International Journal of Interdisciplinary and Multidisciplinary Studies. 2015; 2(3): 22-35.
18. Lee SY. The effects of green supply chain management on the supplier’s performance through social capital accumulation. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal. 2015 Jan 12; 20(1): 42-55.
19. Bhattacharjee K. Green supply chain management-challenges and opportunities. Asian Journal of Technology & Management Research. 2015 Jan; 5(01): 14-19.
20. Dangelico RM, Vocalelli D. “Green Marketing”: An analysis of definitions, strategy steps, and tools through a systematic review of the literature. Journal of Cleaner production. 2017 Nov 1; 165: 1263-1279.
21. Armstrong Soule CA, Reich BJ. Less is more: is a green demarketing strategy sustainable?. Journal of Marketing Management. 2015 Sep 2; 31(13-14): 1403-1427.
22. Wang H, Ko E, Woodside A, Yu J. SNS marketing activities as a sustainable competitive advantage and traditional market equity. Journal of Business Research. 2021 Jun 1; 130: 378-383.
23. Jung J, Kim SJ, Kim KH. Sustainable marketing activities of traditional fashion market and brand loyalty. Journal of Business Research. 2020 Nov 1; 120: 294-301.
24. Syaekhoni MA, Alfian G, Kwon YS. Customer purchasing behavior analysis as alternatives for supporting in-store green marketing decision-making. Sustainability. 2017 Nov 2; 9(11): 2008. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9112008
25. Bărbulescu O, Tecău AS, Munteanu D, Constantin CP. Innovation of startups, the key to unlocking post-crisis sustainable growth in Romanian entrepreneurial ecosystem. Sustainability. 2021 Jan 12; 13(2): 671. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13020671
26. Martínez JB, Fernández ML, Fernández PM. Corporate social responsibility: Evolution through institutional and stakeholder perspectives. European journal of management and business economics. 2016 Jan 4; 25(1): 8-14.
27. Hategan CD, Sirghi N, Curea-Pitorac RI, Hategan VP. Doing well or doing good: The relationship between corporate social responsibility and profit in Romanian companies. Sustainability. 2018 Apr 1; 10(4): 1041. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10041041
28. Oláh J, Kitukutha N, Haddad H, Pakurár M, Máté D, Popp J. Achieving sustainable e-commerce in environmental, social and economic dimensions by taking possible trade-offs. Sustainability. 2018 Dec 24; 11(1): 89. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11010089
29. Salem S, Chaichi K. Investigating causes and consequences of purchase intention of luxury fashion. Management Science Letters. 2018; 8(12): 1259-1272.
30. Lemon KN, Verhoef PC. Understanding customer experience throughout the customer journey. Journal of marketing. 2016 Nov; 80(6): 69-96.
31. McLean G, Wilson A. Evolving the online customer experience… is there a role for online customer support?. Computers in human behavior. 2016 Jul 1; 60: 602-610.
32. Keiningham T, Aksoy L, Bruce HL, Cadet F, Clennell N, Hodgkinson IR, Kearney T. Customer experience driven business model innovation. Journal of Business Research. 2020 Aug 1; 116: 431-440.
33. Shetty A, Basri S. Relationship orientation in banking and insurance services–a review of the evidence. Journal of Indian Business Research. 2018 Aug 30; 10(3): 237-255.
34. Neculaesei AN, Tatarusanu M, Anastasiei B, Dospinescu N, Bedrule Grigoruta MV, Ionescu AM. A model of the relationship between organizational culture, social responsibility and performance. Transformations in Business & Economics. 2019 May 5; 18(2A): 42-59.
35. Nikbin D, Marimuthu M, Hyun SS. Influence of perceived service fairness on relationship quality and switching intention: An empirical study of restaurant experiences. Current Issues in Tourism. 2016 Aug 23; 19(10): 1005-1026.
36. Lee Y. Relationship quality and its causal link to service value, satisfaction, and word-of-mouth. Services Marketing Quarterly. 2016 Jul 2; 37(3): 171-184.
37. Jiang Z, Shiu E, Henneberg S, Naude P. Relationship quality in business to business relationships—Reviewing the current literatures and proposing a new measurement model. Psychology & Marketing. 2016 Apr; 33(4): 297-313.
38. Wu SH, Huang SC, Tsai CY, Lin PY. Customer citizenship behavior on social networking sites: the role of relationship quality, identification, and service attributes. Internet Research. 2017 Apr 3; 27(2): 428-448.
39. Chetioui Y, Benlafqih H, Lebdaoui H. How fashion influencers contribute to consumers' purchase intention. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management: An International Journal. 2020 Aug 20; 24(3): 361-380.
40. Vahdati H, Mousavi Nejad SH. Brand personality toward customer purchase intention: the intermediate role of electronic word-of-mouth and brand equity. Asian Academy of Management Journal. 2016 Jul 1; 21(2): 1–26.
41. Jung J, Kim SJ, Kim KH. Sustainable marketing activities of traditional fashion market and brand loyalty. Journal of Business Research. 2020 Nov 1; 120: 294-301.
42. Du K. The impact of multi-channel and multi-product strategies on firms' risk-return performance. Decision Support Systems. 2018 May 1; 109: 27-38.
43. Chae H, Ko E, Han J. How do customers' SNS participation activities impact on customer equity drivers and customer loyalty? Focus on the SNS services of a global SPA brand. Journal of Global Scholars of Marketing Science. 2015 Apr 3; 25(2): 122-141.
44. Su L, Swanson SR. Perceived corporate social responsibility's impact on the well-being and supportive green behaviors of hotel employees: The mediating role of the employee-corporate relationship. Tourism management. 2019 Jun 1; 72: 437-450.
45. Yang X. Determinants of consumers’ continuance intention to use social recommender systems: A self-regulation perspective. Technology in Society. 2021 Feb 1; 64: 101464. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101464
46. Salem MB, Stolfo SJ. Detecting Masqueraders: A Comparison of One-Class Bag-of-Words User Behavior Modeling Techniques. Journal of Wireless Mobile Networks, Ubiquitous Computing and Dependable Applications 2010 Jun; 1(1): 3-13.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Beeraka Chalapathi, Dr.G. Rajini (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The article is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Unless otherwise stated, associated published material is distributed under the same licence.
