Simulation and Experimental Approach for Metal Forming with a Multi-Point Die
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56294/sctconf2024855Keywords:
Multi-Point Forming (MPF), Multi-Point Die, Finite Element Method; Spring Back, Spring BackAbstract
Multi-point forming (MPF) is considered a flexible and innovative sheet metal forming process that allows for the creation of three-dimensional curved surfaces. This study investigates the effects of various parameters on the final product in metal forming using a multi-point die. The research employs a combination of numerical simulations and experimental work to analyze and minimize defects in the forming process. The concentration is on brass (Cu Zn 65-35) and rubber materials, with specific thicknesses of 0,71 mm and 2 mm, respectively. Although ANSYS 15.0 is used to study the stresses and strains resulting from the formation process with the multi-point die (MPD), the experimental work was conducted to study the effect of two parameters: forming speeds (5 and 15 mm/min) and holding times (1, 3, and 5 minutes were used in this process). The simulation results reveal that the use of rubber significantly reduces defects such as dimples on the sheet surface. Additionally, the presence of rubber helps distribute the force, leading to a reduction in maximum stress and strain in the blank profile to approximately 27 % and 49 %, respectively, in the second case. The study also explores the impact of forming speed and holding time on spring back. BY measuring the dimensional accuracy of the final products. A forming speed of 5 mm/min and a holding time of 5 minutes resulted in the best outcomes, with a minimum average spring back (0,997). Moreover, the ANOVA algorithm was used to discuss the results which indicated that the forming speed and holding time significantly affect the dimensional accuracy. The research shows that altering settings and adding rubber to multi-point forming improves product quality and accuracy. This study enhances metal forming knowledge and improves industrial processes
References
1. Dilip Kumar K, Appukuttan KK, Neelakantha VL, Naik PS. Experimental determination of spring back and thinning effect of aluminum sheet metal during L-bending operation. Mater Des 2014;56:613–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2013.11.047.
2. Bachmann AL, Dickey MD, Lazarus N. Making light work of metal bending: Laser forming in rapid prototyping. Quantum Beam Sci 2020;4:14–7. https://doi.org/10.3390/qubs4040044.
3. Abbas TF, Younis KM, Mansor KK. The Influence of Process Parameters on Thickness Distribution in Multipoint Forming Process Using Finite Element Analysis. 2nd Int Conf Electr Commun Comput Power Control Eng ICECCPCE 2019 2019:120–5. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICECCPCE46549.2019.203759.
4. Li Y, Li R, Liang C, Liang J, Teng F. Influence of the Curvature of the Multipoint Die for Flexible Multipoint Stretch Bending on the Quality of Aluminum Profile. Math Probl Eng 2020;2020. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/5960973.
5. Liu W, Chen YZ, Xu YC, Yuan SJ. Evaluation on dimpling and geometrical profile of curved surface shell by hydroforming with reconfigurable multipoint tool. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 2016;86:2175–85. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-015-8264-y.
6. Wardhani R, Putu S, Sanjoto BL, Nur H, Hari S. Numerical simulation of multipoint forming with circular die pins in hexagonal packing. Appl Mech Mater 2014;493:589–93. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.493.589.
7. Bedan AS, Algodi SJ, Hussain EA. Investigating the Effect of Hybrid Process: MPF/SPIF on the Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Brass (65-35) Sheet. Adv Sci Technol Res J 2023;17:302–8. https://doi.org/10.12913/22998624/167409.
8. Abosaf M, Essa K, Alghawail A, Tolipov A, Su S, Pham D. Optimisation of multi-point forming process parameters. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 2017;92:1849–59. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-017-0155-y.
9. Selmi N, Salah HBH. Flexible multipoint hydroforming using metallic sheet medium. Second Tunis Congr … 2012:19–22. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.2761.6889.
10. Paunoiu, V.; Maier, C.; Teodor, V.; Gavan E. Numerical Analysis of Multi-Point Forming Process. Int J Mod Manuf Technol 2011;III:85–90.
11. Liu Y, Li M, Ju F. Research on the process of flexible blank holder in multi-point forming for spherical surface parts. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 2017;89:2315–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-016-9198-8.
12. Lin X, Li Y, Cai Z, Liang J, Liang C, Yu K, et al. Effect of Flexible 3D Multipoint Stretch Bending Dies on the Shape Accuracy and the Optimal Design. Adv Mater Sci Eng 2018;2018. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/1095398.
13. Qu E, Li M, Li R. Deformation behavior in multi-point forming using a strip steel pad. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part C J Mech Eng Sci 2020;234:1775–85. https://doi.org/10.1177/0954406219898233.
14. Abaas TF, Younis KM, Mansor K kadhim. Die Design of Flexible Multi-Point Forming Process. Al-Khwarizmi Eng J 2019;14:22–9. https://doi.org/10.22153/kej.2018.12.002.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Alyaa Al-Ghuraibawi, Aseel Hamad Abed, Khalida Kadhim Mansor (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The article is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Unless otherwise stated, associated published material is distributed under the same licence.
