Environmental Impact of Petroleum Refinery Effluent on Groundwater Pollution: A Case Study of Maysan Refinery, Iraq

Authors

  • Abdul Razzaq M. Khalefah Al-Mussaib Technical College, Al-Furat Al-Awsat Technical University, Babylon 51001, Iraq Author
  • Isam I. Omran Al-Mussaib Technical College, Al-Furat Al-Awsat Technical University, Babylon 51001, Iraq Author
  • Maki J. M. Al-Waily Al-Mussaib Technical College, Al-Furat Al-Awsat Technical University, Babylon 51001, Iraq. Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56294/sctconf2024844

Keywords:

Refinery Effluent, Petroleum Pollutants, Oil and Grease, TOC, Phenol, Heavy Metals, Groundwater Pollution

Abstract

The study aimed to investigate the environmental impact of the refinery's wastewater on groundwater within the refinery and the surrounding area. Six different testing sites were chosen to measure the concentrations of groundwater pollutants according to their distance from the untreated oil effluent discharge lagoon. The study period lasted for six months, as the testing work began in April and ended in September 2023. The results showed a clear effect of untreated petroleum effluent on the properties of groundwater, as the concentrations of petroleum effluent (oil and grease, TOC, phenol) and heavy metals (Ni, Cd, Pb) exceeded the permissible limits, as well as related parameters (TDS, EC, Cl, SO4) according to WHO specifications. As for the concentrations of the parameters (BOD, COD), there was no clear effect of the effluent on them, and on the contrary, their values began to increase at the testing sites far from the refinery. The groundwater was greatly affected by a distance of 5 km from the effluent collection lagoon (testing sites: GW1, GW2, GW3, and GW4), and it was not suitable for human use until after it was treated. As for the remaining of the distance (testing sites:GW5, GW6) to the nearest residential area (from 5 km to 9 km), the groundwater was limited to use for irrigation according to WQI guidelines. The study recommends that, in order to reduce pollution of refinery effluent, the responsible administration should use regular wastewater networks, construct a treatment plant for this effluent, and discharge the treated effluent to the nearest water source

References

1. Ugwoha, E. and Omenogor, B.,” Effect of Oil Spillage on Groundwater Quality”, Journal of Environmental Studies, Vol.:3, Issue:1, 2017.

2. Khaiwal, R.; Parteek, S.; Sahil, M.; Tanbir, S.; Suman, M.,” Evaluation of groundwater contamination in Chandigarh: Source identification and health risk assessment”. Environ. Pollut., 255, 113062, 2019.

3. Ahmed A., Nawaz R., Woulds C., Drake F.,” Infuence of hydro-climatic factors on future coastal land susceptibility to erosion in Bangladesh: a geospatial modelling approach”. J Geovis Spat Anal 4:6. DOI:10.1007/s41651-020-00050-x, 2020.

4. Li P.; He X.; Li Y. and Xiang G., “Occurrence and health implication of fluoride in groundwater of Loess aquifer in the Chinese Loess Plateau: a case study of Tong Chuan, northwest China”, Expo Health 11(2):95–107, 2019. DOI: 10.1007/s12403-018-0278-x

5. Khan, R.; Jhariya, D.C.,” Assessment of Groundwater Pollution Vulnerability Using GIS Based Modified DRASTIC Model in Raipur City”, Chhattisgarh. J. Geol. Soc. India, 93, 293–304, 2019.

6. Fang Z., Liu Z., Zhao S., Ma Y., Li X., and Gao H., “Assessment of Groundwater Contamination Risk in Oilfield Drilling Sites Based on Groundwater Vulnerability. Pollution Source Hazard, and Groundwater Value Function in Yitong County”, Water, 14, 628,2022. DOI: 10.3390/w14040628

7. Adimalla N., Qian H.,” Geospatial distribution and potential noncarcinogenic health risk assessment of nitrate contaminated groundwater in Southern India: a case study”. Arch Environ. Contamination and Toxicology (this issue). DOI:10.1007/s00244-020- 00762-7, 2021.

8. Alazaiza, M. Y. D., Ngien, S. K., Bob, M. M., Kamaruddin, S. A., and Ishak, W. M. F., ”Non-aqueous phase liquids distribution in three-fluid phase systems in double-porosity soil media: Experimental investigation using image analysis”. Groundwater Sustain. Dev. 7, 133–142, 2018. DOI:10.1016/j.gsd.2018.04.002.

9. Medici, G.; Engdahl, N.B.; Langman, J.B.,” A Basin-Scale Groundwater Flow Model of the Columbia Plateau Regional Aquifer System in the Palouse (USA): Insights for Aquifer Vulnerability Assessment”. Int. J. Environ. Res.15, 299–312, 2021.

10. Ren, W., Ershadnia, R., Wallace, C. D., LaBolle, E. M., Dai, Z., de Barros, F. P.,” Evaluating the effects of multiscale heterogeneous sediments on solute mixing and effective dispersion”. Water Resour. Res. 58 (9), e2021WR031886, 2022. DOI:10.1029/ 2021wr03188.

11. Abbas, M., Jardani, A., Machour, N., and Dupont, J. P., “Geophysical and geochemical characterization of a site impacted by hydrocarbon contamination undergoing biodegradation”, Near Surf. Geophys. 16 (2), 176–192, 2018. DOI:10.3997/1873-0604.2017061

12. Li, P.; Karunanidhi, D.; Subramani, T.; and Srinivasamoorthy, K.,” Sources and Consequences of Groundwater Contamination”, Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, 80:1–10,2021. DOI:10.1007/s00244-020-00805-z.

13. Ibrahim, S. A.; Al-Tawash, B. S.; and Abed, M. A.,” Environmental assessment of heavy metals in surface and groundwater at Samarra City, Central Iraq”, Iraqi Journal of Science, Vol. 59, No.3A, pp: 1277-1284, 2018 DOI:10.24996/ijs.2018.59.3A.16.

14. Hashim, M.; Zawawi, M.; Samuding, K.; Dominic, J.; Zulkurnain, M.; and K Mohamad, K., “Study of Groundwater Physical Characteristics: A Case Study at District of Pekan, Pahan”, IOP Conf. Series: Journal of Physics: Conf. Series 995 012096,2018. DOI :10.1088/1742-6596/995/1/012096.

15. Umer, M.; Abduljabar, P.; and Hamid, N.,” Assessment of Ground Water Pollution by Heavy Metals and Anions in Kwashe Industrial Area, Duhok City, Kurdistan Region. Iraq”, IOP Conf. Series: Materials Science and Engineering 454, 012004, 2018. DOI:10.1088/1757-899X/454/1/012004.

16. Ahsan, A.; Ahmed, T.; Alhaz Uddin, M.; and Ali O. Al-Sulttani, A.,” Evaluation of Water Quality Index (WQI) in and around Dhaka City Using Groundwater Quality Parameters”, Water 2023, 15(14), 2666;2023. DOI:10.3390/w15142666.

17. Wang, Y.; Li, R.; Wu, X.; and Yan, Y.,” Evaluation of Groundwater Quality for Drinking and Irrigation Purposes Using GIS-Based IWQI, EWQI and HHR Model”, Water, 15(12), 2233;2023. DOI:10.3390/w15122233.

18. Safo-Adu, G.,” Water Quality Index Model Application in Evaluation of Groundwater Quality in a Waste Treatment Facility”, International Journal of Sustainable Engineering, Vol. 15, Issue 1, 2022. DOI:10.1080/19397038.2022.2146775.

19. Adeniran, M. A,; Oladunjoye, M. A. and Doro, K. O.,” Soil and groundwater contamination by crude oil spillage: A review and implications for remediation projects in Nigeria” Front. Environ. Sci., Volume 11 – 2023 DOI:10.3389/fenvs.2023.1137496

20. Haingotseheno, R., Chrysostome, R. J., Robert, R., and Tojonirina, A. R.,” WATER QUALITY INDEX (WQI) CALCULATION FOR THE EVALUATION OF PHYSICO-CHEMICAL QUALITY OF RAINWATER COLLECTED IN RESERVOIRS FULL OF SAND (RFS)”, IJARIIE-ISSN(O)-2395-4396,Vol-6 Issue-6, 2020.

21. WHO,” Guidelines for drinking-water quality”, 4 ed. incorporating the first and second addenda, WHO Regional Publications, USA, 2022.

22. AWWA, “Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater”, 24th ed., ISBN: 978-0-87553-299-8, USA, 2022.

Downloads

Published

2024-01-01

How to Cite

1.
M. Khalefah AR, Omran II, Al-Waily MJM. Environmental Impact of Petroleum Refinery Effluent on Groundwater Pollution: A Case Study of Maysan Refinery, Iraq. Salud, Ciencia y Tecnología - Serie de Conferencias [Internet]. 2024 Jan. 1 [cited 2024 Dec. 12];3:844. Available from: https://conferencias.ageditor.ar/index.php/sctconf/article/view/927