Analysis of bacteremia risks associated with dental procedures
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56294/sctconf2023767Keywords:
Dental Procedures, Secondary Infections, Bacterial Infections, TOPSIS, ProphylaxisAbstract
In the context of dentistry, it is crucial to note that more than 60 % of blood cultures obtained after oral surgical interventions and dental extractions have demonstrated the presence of anaerobic bacteria, indicating predominantly or mixed anaerobic bacteremia. Given this situation, current research seeks to identify the dental procedures with the highest risk of inducing bacteremia. The methodology used included a systematic review of the literature, thus ensuring the timeliness and relevance of the data collected. Additionally, the TOPSIS method was applied, a multi-criteria decision approach particularly suitable for handling complex situations involving several factors. The results revealed that dental implants and scaling and root planning were associated with a moderate risk, while oral surgery and periodontal treatment showed the highest risks, underscoring the need to implement rigorous preventive strategies. This study emphasizes the need to adapt prophylaxis and post-procedure management to the individual characteristics of the patient and the type of intervention performed, guiding towards the improvement of dental care and the implementation of more effective prevention protocols
References
1. Finello M, Suasnabar DF, de Jesús García M, Díaz M V, Richetta L, Toranzo A, et al. Características clínicas y microbiológicas de infecciones del torrente sanguíneo en pacientes adultos neutropénicos. Rev Argent Microbiol [Internet]. 2021;53(3):183–93. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0325754120300961 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ram.2020.11.001
2. Guna MR, Larrosa N, Marín M, Rodríguez JC. Diagnóstico microbiológico de la bacteriemia y la fungemia: hemocultivos y métodos moleculares. Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin [Internet]. 2019;37(5):335–40. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0213005X18300806 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eimc.2018.03.005
3. González JA, Noriega DD, Escariz LI, Mederos K. Incidencia de factores de riesgo de infecciones, asociadas a la atención en salud en pacientes críticos. Rev San Gregor [Internet]. 2019;1(31):110–7. Available from: http://scielo.senescyt.gob.ec/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2528-79072019000400110 DOI: https://doi.org/10.36097/rsan.v0i31.862
4. Suárez S, Berrío RJ, Marín C, Abadía JD, Botero JE. Prevalencia de endocarditis infecciosa a partir de procedimientos odontológicos. Rev Colomb Cardiol [Internet]. 2023;30(1):3–9. Available from: http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?pid=S0120-56332023000100003&script=sci_arttext DOI: https://doi.org/10.24875/RCCAR.21000117
5. Rodríguez M. Hemocultivos en el Instituto de Hematología e Inmunología: optimizando la toma de muestra. Rev Cuba Hematol Inmunol y Hemoter [Internet]. 2021;37(4). Available from: http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?pid=S0864-02892021000400023&script=sci_arttext
6. Salgado ÁO, Sanz J, Mateos M V, Haidar A, Blanco A, Velasco E. Profilaxis antibiótica en implantología oral. Revisión crítica de la literatura. Rev Española Cirugía Oral y Maxilofac [Internet]. 2019;41(2):80–90. Available from: https://scielo.isciii.es/scielo.php?pid=S1130-05582019000200007&script=sci_arttext DOI: https://doi.org/10.20986/recom.2019.1011/2018
7. Pavez Correa V, Araya Quintanilla A V, López B. Respuesta al tratamiento periodontal de diabéticos tipo 2 con mal control metabólico y obesos intolerantes a la glucosa, con periodontitis severa. Rev clínica periodoncia, Implantol y Rehabil oral [Internet]. 2011;4(2):50–3. Available from: https://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?pid=S0719-01072011000200002&script=sci_arttext&tlng=pt DOI: https://doi.org/10.4067/S0719-01072011000200002
8. Ramos C, González M, López M, Obando J, Nafeh M, Hernández M. Endocarditis infecciosa en válvulas protésicas. CorSalud [Internet]. 2020;12(2):146–54. Available from: http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?pid=S2078-71702020000200146&script=sci_arttext
9. Di Filippo S. Endocarditis infecciosa y cardiopatía congénita. EMC-Pediatría [Internet]. 2022;57(1):1–8. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S124517892246104X DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1245-1789(22)46104-X
10. Vera JRM, Mestre MM, Santana PS. Bacteriemia secundaria a procedimientos odontológicos periodontales. Rev Esp Quim [Internet]. 2008;21(3):153–6. Available from: http://www.seq.es/seq/0214-3429/21/3/maestre.pdf
11. Gallart E, Delicado M, Nuvials X, de Bacteriemia Zero G de T. Actualización de las recomendaciones del Proyecto Bacteriemia Zero. Enfermería Intensiva [Internet]. 2022;33(Supplement 1):S31–9. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1130239922000694 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enfi.2022.06.002
12. Opricovic, S., & Tzeng GH. Compromise solution by MCDM methods: A comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS. Eur J Oper Res [Internet]. 2004;156(1):445–455. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0377221703000201 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(03)00020-1
13. Çelikbilek Y, Tüysüz F. An in-depth review of theory of the TOPSIS method: An experimental analysis. J Manag Anal [Internet]. 2020;7(2):281–300. Available from: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/23270012.2020.1748528 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23270012.2020.1748528
14. Bagán J V, Bascones A, Llamas R, Llena J, Salmerón JI, Morales A, et al. Documento de consenso sobre la utilización de profilaxis antibiótica en cirugía y procedimientos dentales. Av Odontoestomatol [Internet]. 2006;22(1):41–67. Available from: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=1427078 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4321/S0213-12852006000100005
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Washington Paul Culqui Molina, Segundo Moisés San Lucas Coque, Samira Alejandra Duran Maldonado, Daniela Alexandra Freire Herrera (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The article is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Unless otherwise stated, associated published material is distributed under the same licence.
